BULLETIN OF ENTOMOLOGY VOL III 1953-1954 PRINTED BY ORDER OF THE TRUSTEES OF THE BRITISH MUSEUM (NATURAL HISTORY) LONDON: 19^3-1954 DATES OF PUBLICATION OF THE PARTS No. i. 17 June 1953 No. 2. 10 October 1953 No. 3. 20 November 1953 No. 4. ii December 1953 No. 5. 4 December 1953 No. 6. 12 March 1954 No. 7. 27 April 1954 No. 8. 23 November 1954 No. 9. 22 October 1954 No. 10. 23 November 1954 No. 11. 23 November 1954 No. 12. 30 November 1954 No. 13. 21 December 1954 No. 14. 31 December 1954 PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN AT THE BARTHOLOMEW PRESS DORKING BY ADLARD AND SON, LTD. CONTENTS ENTOMOLOGY VOLUME 3 No. i. The sub-genus Stegomyia (Diptera : Culicidae) in the Ethiopian Region. Part II. Distribution of species confined to the East and South African sub-region. By P. F. MATTINGLY i No. 2. A pest of coconut palms in Portuguese East Africa. Two new representatives of the genus Hypotrabala (Lepidoptera : Lasiocampidae) from the Belgian Congo. By W. H. T. TAMS (Pis. 1-2) 67 No. 3. A revision of the genus Teriomima Kirby (Lepidoptera : Lycaenidae). By H. STEMPFFER and N. H. BENNETT (Pis. 3-9) 77 No. 4. Notes on British Ichneumoninae with descriptions of new species (Hym., Ichneumonidae). By J. F. PERKINS 103 No. 5. On a very remarkable flea from Argentina. By H. E. KARL JORDAN Descriptions of new and little-known Siphonaptera. By F. G. A. M. SMIT 177 No. 6. The early literature on Mallophaga. Part III. 1776-86. By THERESA CLAY and G. H. E. HOPKINS (Pls.io-i2) 221 No. 7. Some sawflies of the European Alps and the Mediterranean Region (Hymenoptera : Symphyta). By R. B. BENSON 267 No. 8. Neue Notiophygidae (Coleoptera). Von HANS JOHN (Pis. 13-17) 297 No. 9. The Protoptila group of the Glossosomatinae (Trichoptera : Rhyaco- philidae). By MARTIN E. MOSELY 315 No. 10. A review of the Aedes scutellaris subgroup with a study of variation in Aedes pseudoscutellaris (Theobald). (Diptera : Culicidae). By ELIZABETH N. MARKS (PI. 18) 347 No. ii. A new genus and some new species of the Chauliodini (Megaloptera). By D. E. KIMMINS 415 No. 12. The genera Henricohahnia Breddin, Dicrotelus Erichson, Nyllius Stal, Orgetorixa China and allied new genera. By N. C. E. MILLER 445 No. 13. Revisional notes on the genus Epitola Westwood (Lepidoptera : Lycaenidae). By PATRICK ROCHE (Pis. 19-22) 489 No. 14. African species of the genus Pardomima Warren (Lepidoptera : Pyra- lidae : Pyraustinae). By EDWARD L. MARTIN (PI. 23) 503 Index to Volume 3 523 f. CORRIGENDA P. 141, line 13. For " Ctenichneumon rubroator " read " Ctenichneumon rubroater." P. 149, last line. For " Pseudamblyteles " read " Pseudoambly teles." P. 160, line 10. For " 8. vm. 1936 " read " 10. x. 1935." P. 171, column i, last line. For " corruscator " read " coruscator." P. 173, column 2, line 35. For " Cyclolabus Heinrich 1935 " read " Cyclolabus Heinrich 1936." P. 181. For " Barreropsyilini " read " Barreropsyllini." P. 445 (title-page). For " Pp. 445-488 " read " Pp. 445-486." P. 487 (title-page). For " Pp. 489-502 " read " Pp. 487-502." P. 503 (title-page). For " Pp. 503-521 " read " Pp. 503-522." 2 4 JUN 1953 THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA (DIPTERA: CULICIDAE) IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION (PART II) P. F. MATTINGLY BULLETIN OF THE BRITISH MUSEUM (NATURAL HISTORY) ENTOMOLOGY Vol. 3 No. i LONDON: 1953 THE SUB-GENUS STBGOMYIA (DIPTERA: CULICIDAE) IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION II. DISTRIBUTION OF SPECIES CONFINED TO THE EAST AND SOUTH AFRICAN SUB-REGION BY P. F. MATTINGLY Pp. 1-65 ; 15 Text-figures BULLETIN OF THE BRITISH MUSEUM (NATURAL HISTORY) ENTOMOLOGY Vol. 3 No. i LONDON: 1953 THE BULLETIN OF THE BRITISH MUSEUM (NATURAL HISTORY), instituted in 1949, is issued in five series corresponding to the Departments of the Museum, and an Historical Series. Parts appear at irregular intervals as they become ready. Volumes will contain about three or four hundred pages, and will not necessarily be completed within one calendar year. This paper is Vol. 3, No. i of the Entomological series. PRINTED BY ORDER OF THE TRUSTEES OF THE BRITISH MUSEUM Issued May, 1953. Price Fifteen Shillings. THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA (DIPTERA CULICIDAE) IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION. II. DISTRIBUTION OF SPECIES CONFINED TO THE EAST AND SOUTH AFRICAN SUB-REGION By P. F. MATTINGLY CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . . NOTES ON TAXONOMY ...... DISTRIBUTION RECORDS ..... Doubtful records ...... Records based on misidentifications Unidentified and misquoted localities Distribution outside the Ethiopian Region LIST OF LOCALITIES WITH TOPOGRAPHICAL DETAILS BIONOMICS IN RELATION TO DISTRIBUTION . Breeding-places ...... Seasonal distribution ..... Biting-habits ...... ZOOGEOGRAPHY . . . . . SUMMARY ........ APPENDIX I. Further notes -on species occurring in Sub-Region ........ APPENDIX II. Rainfall of the Bor-Pibor-Torit area .... APPENDIX III. Distribution of pale forms of Aedes aegypti in the Ethiopian Region ......... APPENDIX IV. Corrigenda to Part I ....... ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .......... REFERENCES the West African Page 4 4 18 22 25 25 26 26 28 28 29 30 31 50 51 57 60 6l 62 62 SYNOPSIS The distribution of Stegomyia spp. occurring in the West African Sub-region has been dis- cussed in the first paper of this series. The present paper deals with the remaining Ethiopian species, i.e., with those which are restricted to the East and South African Sub-region. As before, zoogeography is discussed mainly in relation to rainfall and altitude, and such notes on bionomics are included as are thought necessary for an understanding of distribution. One new species closely related to Aedes aegypti is described from Mauritius, and the male of Aedes woodi, larvae which may prove to be those of pseudonigeria and masseyi and a new subspecies of dendrophilus from Kenya are described for the first time. Previously unpublished taxo- nomic data concerning most species are included. An appendix is devoted to the distribution of pale forms of Aedes aegypti in the Ethiopian Region, and other appendices deal with recent ENTOM. Ill, I. I 4 THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION information concerning the species treated in the first paper and with the rainfall of the Bor- Pibor-Torit area. The distribution of certain Palearctic Stegomyia is discussed in relation to the problem of the origins of the Ethiopian fauna and an account is given of a specimen of Aedes cretinus. INTRODUCTION THE present paper follows the pattern of its predecessor (Mattingly, 1952), but is concerned with those species which have not as yet been recorded from anywhere in the West African Sub-region. The number of species discussed is greater than in the first paper but much less is known about them, and this is true of every depart- ment of mosquito studies. In the field of distribution certain territories, notably Tanganyika and Nyasaland, which are of vital importance, are almost unknown. With respect to taxonomy four species, poweri, masseyi, chaussieri and pseudo- nigeria, are, at the time of writing, known with certainty only from the adult female, although there is good reason to hope that males and early stages of all of them may very soon be described. The early stages of woodi are still unknown, but again there is good hope that these will soon be available. Among these species the first four are all likely to prove of special value for our understanding of the origins and affinities of the sub-genus. In the field of bionomics no studies comparable with those carried out by the yellow fever institutes in Uganda and, to a less extent, Nigeria are as yet available. The present paper, like its predecessor, attempts to bring together all available information relating to Stegomyia distribution as a preliminary to the taxonomic study which will form the subject of further papers in the series. It is clear that a review of the sub-genus as a whole will be necessary and this will be undertaken in the third paper of the series. In the present paper all that is attempted is a partial revision of group A, the principal Ethiopian group, and some attention is paid to the distribution of certain Palearctic species, since it is apparent that even this group cannot be fully understood against a purely Ethiopian background. To save repetition the list of localities with topographical details and the list of references have been restricted to information which has not already been published in Part I. Keys are also omitted since these have already been published. The map of the distribution of collectors (Mattingly, 1952, fig. i) is not thought to have been sufficiently affected by new records to be worth reprinting. It can be brought up to date almost completely by adding those localities listed on p. 56 of the present paper together with the Kologha Forest, Njombe and the Tzitzikama Mountains. NOTES ON TAXONOMY The necessity for a revision of the main groups of the sub-genus as defined by Edwards (1932) has already been noted (Mattingly, 1952), and it is now possible to make certain concrete suggestions for a partial revision of the main Ethiopian group, group A. For reasons given below it is felt strongly that this should be extended by the inclusion of Aedes mascarensis from Edwards' group B, together with the closely related species from Mauritius which is here described for the first time (p. 16). At the same time it is felt that if the present groups are to be maintained THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION 5 then Aedes chemulpoensis Yamada should be transferred from group B to group A. This species is at present known only from North-eastern China, the Mukden area and Korea, but it is a perfectly typical member of group A with respect both to its scutal markings and its male genitalia. Yamada in his type description (Yamada, 1931) noted the resemblance of the scutal markings to those of simpsoni and poweri, and Feng (19386) again noted its affinities with group A in the first published descrip- tion of the male terminalia. Edwards seems to have been unacquainted with the male terminalia when he drew up his classification, since the only male specimen in the British Museum of earlier date than Feng's description is undissected. In its femoral and tibial markings chemulpoensis resembles mttatus and it is thus an- nectant to group D. The structure of the ventral brush of the larva is somewhat peculiar, but in other respects this stage also is characteristic of group A. The occurrence in Eastern Asia of a member of group A, which, if we except the cosmotropical Aedes aegypti, is otherwise entirely Ethiopian, may at first sight seem rather startling, but taken in conjunction with such other facts as the occur- rence of mttatus in Spain, North Africa, the Balearic Islands, Corsica and Sardinia and of an isolated species of Group C (cretinus) in Crete, Macedonia and Trans- caucasia (Georgia), it is in reasonable conformity with prevailing ideas concerning the pre-glacial distribution of Palearctic woodland faunas. Basing his ideas on the present distribution of loess, Reinig (1936) has pictured the occurrence during the Glacial Period of a broad belt of desiccation with, at its ends, a Mediterranean and an East Asian wooded refuge. This author figures certain smaller refuges in between (loc. cit., fig. 12), but it would seem that among these the Armenio-Persian was glaciated at least in part during the maximum extension of the ice sheets (com- pare, for example, Furon, 1943, fig. 20). De Beaufort (1951) summarizes Reinig's theories but does not mention these smaller refuges. The present distribution of isolated populations of groups A, C and D in the Palearctic is in close conformity with Reinig's views. Aedes mttatus exactly occupies the western portion of his Mediterranean refuge, and chemulpoensis fits squarely into his East Asian refuge. The Cretan and Macedonian form of cretinus fits well into the eastern portion of his Mediterranean refuge, but the form (lindtropi Schingarew) from Georgia assigned by Baschkareva (1931) and Stackelberg (1937) to this species occurs much too far east and is perhaps to be associated rather with the Armenio-Persian refuge. It does not seem certain that this form is in fact conspecific with cretinus, although it may be that the present distribution shows the effect of post-glacial migration, or that Reinig's Mediterranean refuge ought to be extended to include the southern fringes of the Black Sea. Unfortunately only a single much damaged specimen of cretinus from any part of its range is at present available for examination (see below under Aedes albopictus, p. 18). Examples of affinities between the Mediter- ranean and East Asian refuges quoted by De Beaufort are the Blue Jay, Cyanopica cyana, with two subspecies in Spain and Portugal and five in South-East Asia and Japan, none occurring in between, and the Barbary Ape (Macaco, sylvana = M. inud] of Gibraltar with relatives confined to Southern Asia and Japan. It is to be noted that in both these cases, as in the case of mttatus and chemulpoensis, the East Asian fauna is represented only in the western and not in the eastern part 6 THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION of the Mediterranean refuge. In fact it seems that in these cases the western and eastern portions of the Mediterranean refuge constitute distinct faunal areas. This discontinuity between the western and eastern Mediterranean refuges is further illustrated by the case, quoted by De Beaufort later in his book, of the mountain goat, Capra pyrenaica, which occurs in the Pyrenees and the higher ranges of the Iberian peninsula and has relatives in Eastern Europe, Crete and the Caucasus but none in the Alps or Appenines. Finally De Beaufort mentions the work of Caradja (1934), who traces affinities between the Lepidoptera of South-west Europe and those of Eastern Asia and observes that they are more primitive than those occurring in between. On the basis of these facts it may be said that there is evidence for a much wider pre-glacial extension of groups A and D, and perhaps also C, in the Southern Palearctic. It may be noted that cretinus also has a relative (flavopictus of Japan and Korea) in the East Asian refuge, but it is preferred to postpone discussion of this point to a later paper dealing with the general problem of affinities within the sub-genus. All that is intended here is to attempt to justify the inclusion of chemulpoensis in group A and to show that this is defensible on distributional as well as on morphological grounds. The eastern rather than western Palearctic affinities of group A is a matter of some general zoogeographical interest, since a similar phenomenon has been encountered in some other groups (see, in particular, Uvarov, in press). Aedes amaltheus. This very remarkable species possesses mesonotal markings typical of Edwards' group A and male terminalia of the type found in his groups B and C. The difficulty of fitting it into Edwards' system has already been noted (Mattingly, 1952), and it will be necessary to deal with this problem in the paper to be devoted to the discussion of the taxonomy of the whole sub-genus in relation to that of the Ethiopian species. Here it may be noted that the only comparable species (Aedes galloisi Yamada) again occurs in Reinig's Easter Asian refuge, being confined as far as is known to Japan. It does not appear, however, that the meso- notal markings of this species are absolutely typical of group A. No specimens are available for examination, but published figures (e.g., in Stackelberg, 1937) show the supra-alar patches extending forward to fuse with the anterolateral patches and backwards to the scutellum. This type of pattern is characteristic of a number of Palearctic, Ethiopian and northern oriental Finlaya. The male terminalia and the larva (Sasa and Kano, 1951) appear to be quite typical of group C. The morpho- logical characters of amaltheus have been well described by De Meillon and Lavoi- pierre (1944), and nothing can usefully be added here except to note that the larva possesses certain interesting and possibly primitive characters recalling vittatus on the one hand and unilineatus on the other, e.g., the branched antennal seta (see Hopkins, 1952), strongly branched saddle hair, spinose saddle edge and tendency to development of precratal tufts. Aedes pseudonigeria. The larva from Magoebaskloof, Transvaal, attributed to this species by Ingram & De Meillon (1929) and subsequently to demeilloni by Edwards (1936), seems almost certainly to have been wrongly attributed in both cases. It was described by the present author (in Hopkins, 1952) as ? pseudonigeria THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION 7 purely to avoid introducing another name into the synonymy. In fact, however, it is virtually identical with the larva of heischi and almost certainly belongs to a member of that group. Recently larvae collected by Dr. De Meillon in the Karabib area of South- West Africa have been sent to the British Museum. There is some reason to believe that they may be those of pseudonigeria. Other identical larvae have been taken by De Meillon together with adults of pseudonigeria at Francistown, Bechuanaland (per fide Muspratt). In both cases the larvae are unassociated, and I do not think it possible to rule out the possibility that they are those of unilineatus, which they closely resemble. It is true that unilineatus has not been found in S.W. Africa, but it may well be that collecting there has been confined to altitudes above its, apparently rather restricted, limits. The rainfall in the Karabib area appears to be rather low even for pseudonigeria, but might well not be too low for unilineatus, which is an exceedingly drought-resistant species (see Appendix I). For these reasons I am unwilling to attribute the Karabib or Francistown larvae to pseudonigeria until liason material is available for comparison. A character distinguishing the Karabib larvae from those of unilineatus as at present known is the very small number of pecten spines (4-5 in the available material), and this may prove diagnostic should the identification be confirmed. For a final elucidation of the situation it is still highly desirable that the identity of the Magoebaskloof larva should be established by breeding out. The male of pseudonigeria is still unknown. It should be noted that the " white spot " on the middle femur men- tioned by Edwards (1941) in his key is not a definite spot of the kind found, e.g., in unilineatus or calceatus, but an irregular patch or streak which is likely to be rather indefinite in some specimens. Aedes chaussieri. The male and early stages of this species are still unknown, but as it has recently been found in gallery forest near Elisabethville (Lips, in litt.} there is reason to hope that they may soon be obtained. It is difficult to draw any conclusions as to its relationships until such material is available, and this is unfor- tunate as the species is likely to prove a very interesting one. Aedes masseyi. The male is still unknown, but this species has recently been found in the same forest as chaussieri. In view of its interesting resemblance to amaltheus on the one hand and to keniensis on the other further material will be eagerly awaited. The species is discussed below under keniensis. Aedes keniensis. Van Someren (1946 bis) quotes the presence of pale scaling round the edges of the pre-scutellar bare space as a distinctive character from masseyi. An examination of the type series of the latter species shows, however, that, at least in some cases, the absence of pale scales from this region is due to rubbing. One paratype from Ruwe clearly shows a thin border of narrow yellow scales. In the single specimen from Elisabethville in the British Museum even this very tenuous border is reduced and only one or two yellow scales are visible. A better distinguishing character concerns the third hind tarsal segment, but it should be noted that, as indicated by Edwards (1941), this is not always entirely dark in masseyi, because it has a few pale scales below at the base in the Elisabeth- ville specimen. The specimens from Nairobi tentatively attributed by Edwards (1941) to masseyi are quite clearly keniensis. Both they and the type series of 8 THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION keniensis have the third hind tarsal pale all round on about the basal \ to . Two specimens recently received from Njombe have this segment pale above on about the basal ^ to \ but are more narrowly pale below. The key to adults given in the first paper of this series should be amended accordingly. For a further note on these specimens see below under " Doubtful Records " (p. 22). Two unassociated larvae, recently received from Elisabethville through the kindness of Monsieur Lips, are believed, from their resemblance to keniensis, to be almost certainly those of masseyi. They differ from keniensis in having strongly sclerotized pecten spines, typically with a single strongly developed secondary denticle (occasionally with 1-2 minute ones dorsally or ventrally in addition) and a very short unbranched saddle hair. On the key to larvae (Mattingly, 1952) they would run down to aegypti and mascarensis, from which they can be recognized by the structure of the pecten spines and saddle hair. They came from the township area, and were associated in the one case with larvae of Aedes schwetzi and in the other with those of aegypti. A fuller description will be published elsewhere (Mattingly and Lips, in press). Van Someren (1946 bis) has suggested that keniensis may ultimately prove to be a subspecies of masseyi, and the occurrence of the former at Njombe strongly suggests that it is in fact a highland representative of the latter. At the same time it should be noted that masseyi shows some very interesting resemblances to amaltheus, from which it differs only in scutal characters. Geographically it is more or less inter- mediate between the two species. Further light on its affinities may be expected from the discovery of the male and early stages. Aedes heischi. As noted above, the larva from Magoebaskloof, Transvaal, attri- buted by Ingram and De Meillon (1929) to pseudonigeria is indistinguishable from that of the present species. In view of the very close resemblance of the larva of keniensis, noted by Van Someren (1951), however, it would be most unsafe to make a definite attribution until further larvae have been collected and bred out. It should be noted that, as indicated by Van Someren, heischi is not always separable with certainty from Aedes demeilloni in the adult stage, since occasional specimens, among them several in the British Museum, have no pale scales, apart from the knee-spot on the anterior surface of the mid femur. Aedes demeilloni. This was treated by Edwards (1941) as a subspecies of deboeri but it is clearly a distinct species. Differences between the adults are slight but apparently constant. The larval differences are striking, and there appears to be a constant difference in breeding-places since demeilloni has so far only been found in plant axils, especially those of Dracaena. As noted in the previous paper, con- fusion of this species with dendrophilus (Van Someren, 1946 ; Smithburn & Haddow, 1946 ; Haddow et al., 1947) arose from the misleading description of the latter given by Edwards (1941), and in particular from this author's failure to mention the spines which occur on the basal lobe of the male coxite in both species. Further confusion has arisen from the fact that fig. 6ic of Hopkins (1936), although labelled " deboeri var. demeilloni," was in fact drawn from a larva of angustus, while fig. 6ie, labelled " unilineatus," was drawn from a larva of demeilloni. Aedes subargenteus. The larva of this species has previously been known only from a single specimen from Nyasaland bred from an egg laid by the type female. THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION 9 Through the kindness of Mr. Muspratt, who has recently sent six larvae from Pondoland to the British Museum, it is now possible to amplify the description given by Hopkins (1936, 1952). Mr. Muspratt states that the very pale colour of the head and siphon noted by Hopkins is constant. Antennal seta single. Head setae A, B and C single, d single or split distally into 2-3 branches. Mentum rounded, the teeth rather small, 12-13 teeth on either side of the median tooth. Pleural spines very small and pale in colour. Setae on anterior margin of pro- thorax normally developed. (They are all missing from the Nyasaland larvae, so that Hopkins' statement that they were small and inconspicuous seems probably to have been due to an error of observation.) Comb with 8-10 teeth resembling those of the Nyasaland larva but none of them bifid. Siphonal index (uncrushed) 2 -4-2 -7. Pecten with 7-13 teeth proximal to the subventral seta and 1-2 detached teeth distal to it. Subventral seta bifid and simple -or single and plumose. In one case both conditions are shown by the same larva. Saddle hair single. Upper caudal seta with 3 branches, lower with 2. Setae of ventral brush each with at least 2 branches. Distal edge of saddle with only light sculpturing, i.e., without obvious spiculation. Gills large, sub-equal, sausage-shaped. Aedes kivuensis. This is still known only from the type specimen in the Congo Museum at Tervuren. Through the kindness of the Director and Monsieur Basilew- sky it has been possible to examine this specimen and the following details may be added to the description given by Edwards (1941) : Anterior median spot of mesonotum composed of narrow scales. Anterolateral pale patches small and narrow, their posterior ends terminating well in front of and outside the postero- lateral lines. The latter strongly marked, deep yellow in colour, as in the case of the median lines, and reaching forward almost to the scutal angles. Supra- alar patches small and entirely white. Median lobe of scutellum with a few black scales posteriorly, lateral lobes entirely white. Scale patch on posterior pro- notum very small. Abdomen too shrunken to reveal the tergal bands. Fore-leg with the tibia narrowly but completely ringed at base. First two tarsi uniformly ringed at base, the second white on almost the basal half. Mid-leg with a well- developed white spot beyond half-way on the anterior surface of the femur. Femoral knee-spot small but reaching the tip above. Tibia entirely dark. First and second tarsi uniformly ringed at base, the second white on at least the basal half. Hind leg with femur extensively pale at base, with a small white spot just beyond the tip of the basal pale stripe on the anterior surface and a small knee-spot which reaches the apex above. Tibia entirely dark. First three tarsi narrowly pale at base ; the fourth and fifth entirely pale except for a small black spot at the tip below in each case. In view of our almost complete ignorance of the distribution of this form it is preferred to treat it for the present as a distinct species. Aedes woodi. A long series of adult females has now been received from Ganda through the kindness of Mrs. E. C. C. Van Someren. A full description will be published in the appropriate taxonomic paper of the present series. All the speci- mens are immediately distinguishable from those of any other species, having a double median line of yellow scales on the scutum by the dark-scaled lateral lobes of the scutellum. Only two males have so far been received and neither of these ,io THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION is complete. The palps resemble those of simpsoni rather than strelitziae in having a number of long setae on the two distal segments. The lateral lobes of the scutellum are dark scaled. The scutal ornamentation has been almost entirely obliterated in both specimens, but one of them appears to have the posterior ends of the sub- median lines white or whitish and to have the pre-scutellar bare space rather broadly bordered by white scales in addition to some yellow ones. There is some variation in both respects in the females and comparable variation occurs in Aedes simpsoni. Segment II of the abdomen has a few pale scales at the base of the tergite in one specimen. In the other the tergite is rubbed. The pale basal bands on tergites III-VI are shallow as in the female. Those on V and VI are markedly narrower in the males. Sexual dimorphism with respect to the tergal bands is shown by a number of Ethiopian species of the sub-genus. The male terminalia appear to be virtually identical with those of simpsoni. The legs of both sexes are very much as in the type. The femoral knee-spots are very short, and are separated from the tips of the femora by distinct dark areas. The second mid-tarsal and the third hind tarsal are pale above on about the basal -| and f respectively and both are rather narrower below. The fourth and fifth hind tarsi are missing from both males. In the females they are entirely dark and entirely pale respectively, as in the type. Attempts to find the breeding-places have hitherto proved unsuccessful and the early stages are still unknown. Aedes strelitziae. This has been fully described by Muspratt (1950). Aedes poweri. The type female is still the only specimen that can be assigned with certainty to this species, although further specimens collected by Mr. Muspratt in Cape Province, and discussed below under " Doubtful Records," appear almost certainly to belong to it. The affinities of the species are uncertain although it seems to be most nearly related to contiguus, which it resembles very closely. Certain characters quoted by Edwards are in fact artefacts. Thus the interruptions to the pale border round the eyes (Edwards, 1923 bis) are due to rubbing as, apparently, is the absence of pale scales from the border of the pre-scutellar bare patch (Edwards, 1941). The appearance of the mid-lobe of the scutellum is rather striking, as it possesses more dark scales than are found in the majority of species. Such scales are, however, possessed by all the Ethiopian Stegomyia, and their complete absence from individual specimens is the exception rather than the rule although they are seldom mentioned in descriptions ; contiguus, in particular, often shows them well. The most distinctive character shown by poweri is the possession of a conspicuous pale basal stripe on the lower surface of the middle tibia. This is between and i of the tibial length. The third mid-tarsal is quite extensively pale above at the base, but pale scales in this position are not uncommon as an aberration in a number of species. Since the completion of this paper Mr. Muspratt has sent descriptions of the larva and male terminalia which confirm the relation- ship to the langata-contiguus group suggested below under " Distribution." It seems that the terminalia are indistinguishable from those of contiguus, while the larva is distinguishable only on variations in the statistical distribution of the number of branches in head seta d. Variations in colour characters of the adults include the constant suppression of pale scaling on the distal half of the second THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION n mid-tarsus in the male, occasional presence of pale scales round the pre-scutellar bare space and very occasional presence of a pale spot in the middle of one or both front femora. Aedes contiguus. As noted by Van Someren (1946 bis), this species closely resembles langata. It can, however, be separated on the characters given in the key (Mattingly, 1952). The anterolateral scutal patches are also rather smaller and less wedge-shaped (see pi. ii, fig. n of Edwards (1941) which apparently repre- sents contiguus and not poweri as stated). On the basis of these characters it seems fairly certain that the two rather rubbed females of " contiguus " mentioned by Edwards (1941) are in fact langata. The presence of the latter species in Southern Rhodesia (Ndanga) has been confirmed by the dissection of male terminalia. The presence of contiguus in the Transvaal has also been confirmed by the dissection of male terminalia. Transvaal specimens tend to have the pale band at the base of the third hind tarsal rather broader than do those so far seen from Southern Rhodesia ( the length of the segment in the type male and the specimen from Ndanga and from ^ to | the tarsal length in those specimens so far received from the Transvaal) . This band is therefore not always quite so strikingly narrow as Edwards' description might suggest. A very fine series of Transvaal contiguus has recently been received from Dr. De Meillon, and the question of variation will be discussed in more detail in the taxonomic paper of the present series. Aedes langata. Resemblances to contiguus have been discussed in connection with that species. The length of the pale basal band on the third hind tarsal is again variable (about the length of the segment in the Kenya form, \ this length in the problematical specimen from Nyasaland and \ in the Southern Rhodesian specimens. This character cannot therefore be safely used for separation from contiguus. An incomplete female from Gwelo in the British Museum resembles langata in scutal markings and in the broad abdominal bands and distal expansion of the ventral pale stripe at the base of the hind tibia, but differs from all other available specimens in having a pale posterior stripe on about the basal f of the first mid-tarsal, much as in heischi. This specimen and another, even less complete, from the same locality cannot be attributed with certainty until further material is available. The larva of langata closely resembles those of apicoargenteus, soleatus and schwetzi but, in the material available, it can be separated from the first of these by having the antennal seta at less than 0-7 x the distance from the base, to the apex. Aedes calceatus. The precise status of the various populations attributed to this species is one of the most troublesome problems connected with the Ethiopian Stegomyia at the present time. Much more material is needed from certain parts of the range before the problem can be approached with any confidence. For the moment the following brief notes on variation are all that can be offered. It should be borne in mind that not only this species and soleatus but also heischi and the form from Gwelo here tentatively attributed to langata may exhibit a pale posterior stripe on the first mid-tarsal. From heischi and soleatus all the known forms of calceatus can be separated by having an entirely dark fifth hind tarsal, and soleatus also differs strikingly in its abdominal markings. From calceatus langata differs in its broader 12 THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION abdominal bands and in the shape of the pale line at the base of the hind tibia. In calceatus the Livingstone form differs from the type form in having the femoral knee-spots on the hind legs shorter with the backward prolongation reduced or absent, the pale ring at the base of the third hind tarsal segment only about -^ the length of the segment or less (about ^ the length of the segment in the type form from Tanganyika) and the second abdominal tergite all dark. A single male from the Langata Forest in the British Museum, which has terminalia almost precisely like those of the type form calceatus and is here tentatively attributed to that species, also has the backward prolongation of the hind femoral knee-spot reduced and the band at the base of the third hind tarsal only about \ the length of the segment. In this specimen both the second and third abdominal tergites are dark and the median pale stripe on the scutum is more strongly indicated than in the type form, reaching forward as far as the front end of the anterolateral patches. In the type form this stripe stops short at the posterior end of the anterolateral patches, and is represented further forward by at most a few pale scales. In the Langata form the general reduction of pale scaling is also shown in the rather narrower anterolateral pale patches on the scutum, and in the fact that the second mid-tarsal is dark all round on about the apical third (pale behind to the tip in the type form). The pale scales at the base of the third mid-tarsal mentioned by Edwards (1941) are present in only a few specimens in the type series. They are not shown by the Langata or the Livingstone form. As already noted, pale scales occur in this position as an aberration in a number of species of Ethiopian Stegomyia. Mrs. Van Someren has kindly sent the following note on variation in Kenya Lowland specimens from Ganda, Gede and Kwale at present tentatively attributed to calceatus : " Fore tarsi with first segment wholly or only partly white behind and second segment sometimes white to | behind. Mid-tarsi with the amount of black on the first tarsal joint very variable ; second segment nearly all white with a dark spot at tip anteriorly ; third segment nearly always dark but may have a small patch of white scales at the base behind. Third hind tarsal segment with the white basal band usually very narrow (Ganda and Gede), but it may extend to (Kwale). Hind femur with the anterior surface white on the basal ^ then a small black patch followed by a large silvery white patch at | ; rest black (Ganda and Gede) or white on just over the basal \, rest black (Kwale). Third abdominal tergite with a white band or spot (?)." A full discussion of the significance of this variation must await the taxonomic paper in the present series. Aedes soleatus. A description of the larva of this species has recently been supplied by Mrs. E. C. C. Van Someren for inclusion in the new edition of vol. i of Mosquitoes of the Ethiopian Region (Hopkins, 1952). This description was used together with the paedotype and other specimens in the preparation of the key to larvae in the first paper of the present series. Recent collections in Kenya have shown the adult to be somewhat variable, and Mrs. Van Someren has kindly sent the following note on variation in specimens from Gede and Taveta : " Mid-tarsi 1-4 usually pale behind and above (Gede) or first with only a white ring at the base but sometimes also white behind to near tip, second white with variable amount of black in front at tip, third nearly always black but may sometimes be white THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION 13 behind basally (Taveta). Third hind tarsal segment with basal white ring to . Tergite 2 usually and 3 sometimes without white dorsal bands. ' ' Occasional specimens of the Taveta form with the first mid-tarsal segment largely dark behind would run down, on the key to adults included in the first paper of this series, to the apicoargenteus group, to which soleatus seems to be quite closely related. From the members of this group it can be distinguished by the size and shape of the antero- lateral scutal patches and by the less extensive pale patch on the posterior pro- notum. Other characters which may perhaps prove less reliable are the smaller knee-spots, and the fact that the median anterior pale spot on the scutum is composed of narrow scales. In connection with the latter character it should be noted that Marks (1951) has found that it may vary in the scutellaris group with the temperature at which the early stages are reared. One specimen from Taveta kindly sent by Dr. Lumsden has the basal pale patch on the sixth abdominal tergite little more than half the depth of the segment. Such a specimen, if it possessed the normal type of first tarsal segment, would run down to heischi. If with a first tarsal which was largely dark behind, it would run down to couplet 30, but could not be taken beyond this owing to the combination of pale-ringed fifth hind tarsal segment and pale spot on the anterior surface of the mid-femur. Confusion between atypical specimens of soleatus and heischi seems to be the biggest danger and there is, in fact, some reason to suppose that it may have occurred in the past. The distal expansion of the basal ventral stripe on the hind tibia is perhaps the best single diagnostic character from heischi. In the material at present available the larva of soleatus can be separated from that of apicoargenteus by having the antennal seta at less than 07 x the distance from base to apex. Aedes apicoargenteus ssp. denderensis. This form is of particular interest because it occupies an intermediate position both morphologically and geographically between the apicoargenteus and calceatus groups. It differs from all other forms in both groups, except calceatus, in having the larval siphon entirely dark. The adult shows no constant difference from those of the type form occurring in Uganda and the central Kavirondo district of Kenya, but differs from West African speci- mens, other than those from the Cameroons, in having smaller anterolateral scutal patches and in the more frequent occurrence of pale scales on the lateral lobes of the scutellum. The third hind tarsal is more narrowly banded than is usual in other regions, except the Cameroons, and in one specimen the fifth hind tarsal is almost entirely dark, a feature also known elsewhere at present only from the Cameroons. It is clear that the distinctive features of denderensis which have so far been noted, other than the pigmentation of the larval siphon, are merely those of a highland form. The hind femur is pale behind on about the basal and is more extensively pale than in any other form so far examined. Van Someren (1946), however, has recorded specimens from both Kenya and Uganda in which it is pale on up to a half. Despite the suggestion of Wolfs (1949) to the contrary, the condition of the male terminalia falls within the range of variation exhibited by the type form. The character of the larval siphon is considered to be an important one and, as it appears to be geographically representative, there is felt to be some justification for naming this form as a sub-species. 14 THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION Aedes schwetzi. A description of the larva of this species has recently been published in the second edition of vol. i of Mosquitoes of the Ethiopian Region, to which it was contributed by Mr. G. G. Robinson. It closely resembles those of other members of the group, but is separable from calceatus and denderensis by having the distal part of the siphon markedly paler than the remainder. The range of variation in the position of the antenna! seta overlaps that encountered in apicoargenteus on the one hand and soleatus and langata on the other, since in some larvae it is at more and in others at less than 07 x the distance from base to apex. Only a partial separation is therefore possible. From adults of apico- argenteus it is easily separated by the broad and conspicuous border of pale scales round the pre-scutellar space, but as already noted under apicoargenteus (Mattingly, 1952) the characters of the male terminalia given by Edwards (1941) are not really distinctive unless it be that the ninth tergite of schwetzi is a little more deeply excavated. As far as is known the lateral lobes of the scutellum are always entirely white scaled, and this should make separation from the majority of apicoargenteus easy. Aedes deboeri. This appears to be a member of the dendrophilus group. It shows resemblances to dendrophilus on the one hand and to bambusae on the other. The relationship to bambusae is discussed below under that species. The larva shows no constant difference from that of dendrophilus but, whereas no larvae of the latter so far seen have more than one detached pecten tooth beyond the siphonal tuft, deboeri larvae often have two or three. In deboeri larvae the siphonal tuft is normally bifid, rarely single, whereas Kenya and Uganda dendrophilus normally have it single. Nigerian and Gold Coast larvae of dendrophilus, however, often have it bifid. Adults of deboeri can be separated from those of dendrophilus by the narrower anterolateral pale scutal patches and by having the second mid-tarsal segment pale above on less than half, usually much less, as well as by the largely dark fifth hind tarsal. Aedes bambusae and " ssp. kenyae." Type form bambusae can be recognized from deboeri by the fact that the anterior horn of the anterolateral pale scutal patches is continued round the anterior edge of the scutum nearly to the median anterior pale spot and by the great reduction of the knee-spots on the hind femora, which are represented at most by one or two pale scales. The yellow colouring of the pale scutal markings is not absolutely distinctive, as Kenya deboeri often have these markings pale yellow, and in the single female from Marangu tentatively attributed to this species they are deep yellow. Ssp. kenyae is intermediate between the two forms. Its pale scutal markings vary from deep yellow to whitish and it is thought that the colour may be influenced by climatic factors, though insufficient evidence is as yet available to establish this. It has well-developed knee-spots on both mid and hind femora and in this respect resembles deboeri. Taking into account this fact, its distribution and the known variation in both forms, it seems more reasonable to regard it as a subspecies of deboeri than of bambusae. More detailed evidence with regard to distribution is, however, much to be desired. From deboeri (and from bambusae} ssp. kenyae is readily distinguishable in the larval stage by having the pecten spines arranged in discontinuous groups with 1-5 spines THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION 15 in each. Adult differences from deboeri are less satisfactory, but all specimens at present available are distinguished by the fact that the second mid-tarsal is pale above almost to the tip, at least along the mid-line. Aedes angustus. As already indicated, the larva figured for demeilloni by Hopkins (1936, fig. 6ic) is in fact that of the present species. Dr. Haddow has collected further larvae from the Chuya Forest which almost certainly belong to angustus. Unfortunately, however, the only specimen from the original series which is now available for examination is a single incomplete pelt. The Chuya Forest larvae are separable from those of all other Ethiopian mainland Stegomyia, except unilineatus, the South-west African larvae attributed to pseudonigeria and, in some cases, amaltheus by the fact that the setae composing the ventral brush are single. In addition to the differences from unilineatus given in the key (Mat- tingly, 1952), they can be recognized from all larvae of unilineatus at present available by the absence of stellate setae from the thorax. This character is, however, so variable among the Ethiopian Stegomyia that it has to be employed with very great caution. Aedes ruwenzori. The breeding-places of this species are still undiscovered, but Gillett (19516) has obtained eggs by means of a similar technique to that employed for africanus (Gillet et al., 1950). Larvae were obtained from these eggs, and Mr. Gillett kindly allowed me the use of his MS. in preparing the following brief account : Head seta A with 5-8 branches. Thorax with stellate setae. Comb and pecten spines much as in bambusae. Sub-ventral tuft of siphon with 2-4 branches, usually bifid. Saddle hair with 3-7 branches. Upper caudal seta with 2-5 branches, lower trifid. Setae of ventral brush with 2-4 branches. In the key to larvae (Mattingly, 1952) this species would run down with bambusae, deboeri and dendro- philus. Gillett notes that it can be recognized from bambusae by the presence of stellate setae on the thorax. The unreliability of this character has, however, been noted above, and a better character would perhaps be the large number of branches in head seta A. All larvae of bambusae so far examined have this seta double, and those of deboeri and dendrophilus have it double or at most, in rare cases, triple. Partial differential characters are afforded by the numbers of branches in the sub- ventral tuft of the siphon and in the saddle hair and caudal setae. From angustus the larva should be easily distinguished by the branched setae of the ventral brush as well as by the comb and pecten spines, which are very similar to those of bambusae. The structure of the comb and pecten spines makes separation from africanus both easy and certain and this is an advantage, since damaged adults from high altitudes, such as that from Dendezi (Mattingly, 1952), may be difficult to assign. Aedes mascarensis. That this species is closely related to aegypti is shown by the fact that their male terminalia are virtually identical while their larvae can only be separated with difficulty. Despite this fact Edwards (1932) placed aegypti in his group A and mascarensis in his group B. In doing so he appears to have been influenced by the fact that the mesonotal pattern of mascarensis is at first sight strikingly different from that shown by other members of group A. In the present author's opinion mascarensis should be transferred to group A together with chemul- Poensis (see above). This would render both groups more or less homogeneous i6 THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION with respect to their male terminalia. Nor are the mesonotal markings of mascarensis nearly so aberrant with respect to the rest of the group as the description given by Edwards (1941) would suggest. It is true that the scales over much of the scutum (at least on the anterior half) are silvery white, but this condition is approached by pale specimens of " aegypti var. queenslandensis." What Edwards failed to point out is that even in mascarensis the typical anterolateral patches, postero- lateral lines and supra-alar patches of group A are clearly indicated by local aggre- gations of broader scales. It is true that the median anterior spot and the median longitudinal pale lines are indistinguishable, but these are normally composed of narrow scales in aegypti and in pale specimens of queenslandensis they may be very inconspicuous, while in the so-called " var. mosquito Robineau-Desvoidy " the median lines are absent. A single female adult recently sent to the British Museum by Monsieur Vinson from Moka, Mauritius, differs notably from mascarensis in scutal ornamentation and in the relative widths of the tarsal bands. This seems quite clearly to be a new species, although the possibility of hybridization between aegypti and mascarensis ought to be investigated. The description follows. A'edes (Stegomyia) vinsoni sp. n. Adult $ : Proboscis wholly dark. Clypeus devoid of scales. Back of head differs from that of mascarensis in being devoid of dark scales even in the lateral areas. Posterior pronotum largely covered with broad pale scales. (The precise condition in mascarensis cannot be ascertained from available specimens owing to rubbing, but it certainly bears a number of large, broad, loosely attached pale scales and is not entirely bare as stated by Edwards (1941)). Mesonotum with anterolateral and supra-alar patches, and posterolateral lines clearly marked by aggregations of relatively broad scales as in mascarensis, but differs from mascarensis in having a well-marked median longitudinal stripe of broad scales, tapering posteriorly, the scales on either side of this stripe very pale fawn rather than white. Scales around the pre-scutellar bare space also broadened. The whole of the mesonotum is covered with white or whitish scales. (The normal extent of pale scaling in mascarensis is not clear. Edwards (1941) and MacGregor (1924, 1927) are ambiguous in their descriptions and all specimens at present available are rubbed. It is, however, clear from these specimens that, at least in some cases, the posterior part of the mesonotum is quite extensively dark.) Scutellum apparently with all lobes entirely pale scaled, (mascarensis has the usual small patch of dark scales on the tip of the mid-lobe, although most of these are rubbed away in the available specimens.) Dorsal surface of abdomen almost entirely pale scaled as in some aberrant forms of aegypti (Summers-Connal, 1926, 1927 ; Drake-Brockman, 1911). (In mascarensis the tergites have broad, shallow, pale basal bands as in typical aegypti.) Front femur very largely pale behind, pale in front and above on about the basal three-fifths. A small but conspicuous white spot above at tip. Tibia all dark. Tarsi all dark except the first two, which are narrowly banded at base. The presence of a knee-spot on the front leg is unusual in the Ethiopian Stegomyia. It is shown by aegypti and by some, but not all, topotypic calceatus THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION 17 but is absent in the case of mascarensis, which is almost equally abnormal in having no knee-spots on any of the legs. Mid-femur largely pale in front and behind but with a dark stripe above reaching nearly to base. Tibia entirely dark. First tarsal pale ringed on about the basal , second pale on about the basal ; remainder dark. (mascarensis has no knee-spot and the tarsi are rather more narrowly ringed while the femur as a whole is much darker, pale scaling being restricted to a narrow line on the under surface.) Hind femur pale hi front nearly to tip, pale behind on about the basal f , with a dark streak above tapering backwards for about the basal f. Knee-spot well developed. Tibia entirely dark. First two tarsi each pale on about the basal ^. Third and fourth tarsi pale on about the basal \ and f respectively. Fifth tarsal entirely pale. (As already noted, mascarensis lacks the femoral knee-spot. It also has the femur less extensively pale and the tarsi more narrowly banded except the fourth, which is pale on about the basal f.) All claws apparently simple as in Group C. (Front and middles claws toothed in mascarensis as in group A.) Adult $ and early stages unknown. Holotype $ in British Museum. Aedes granti. This species was placed by Edwards (1932) in his group C. The recent description of the male terminalia (Leeson & Theodor, 1948) shows him to have been correct. All the claws of the female are simple as in group C and some members of group B. The scutal markings are unlike those of most members of the group in that there is a complete border of pale scales round the edges. In this respect they recall paullusi, hakanssoni and scutoscriptus. Knight & Rozeboom (1946) and Knight & Hurlbut (1949) have recently revised group C, splitting off the albolineatus sub-group and raising it to the status of a full group. They recognize three sub-groups typified by scutellaris, albopictus and mediopunctatus respectively, and they place granti in the second of these. In this they are apparently governed by the basal position of the median portion of the pale tergal bands, but on the much more important character of the arrangement of pleural scales (probably unknown to them since there is no description of the condition in granti in the literature) this species should clearly go into the scutellaris sub-group. It has, however, in common with hakanssoni and scutoscriptus (but not paullusi), an extra stripe of pale scales between the dorsal border of the sternopleura and the lower edge of the posterior pronotum, as in albopictus, and is thus distinguished from more typical members of the group. It is possible that these three species should be placed in a separate sub-group. They are all restricted to rather remote islands (in the zoogeographical sense), hakanssoni and scutoscriptus being known only from Truk and Ponape respectively. Further study of the whole group from this point of view is, however, required, and the matter will be discussed more fully in the next paper. Aedes albopictus. As noted above, Knight & Hurlbut (1949) have placed this in a separate sub-group from scutellaris. In the same sub-group they provisionally placed unilineatus. Examination of the latter shows that it possesses all the charac- ters adduced for the albopictus sub-group, but differs from albopictus in having rather more extensive pleural scaling, and in particular in the presence of a small additional ENTOM. Ill, I. 2 i8 THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION patch of scales in the posteroventral corner of the posterior pronotum. In this respect it agrees with Biro's specimen of Aedes cretinus from Amari, Crete (Edwards, 19216), which I have been able to examine through the kindness of Dr. Soos of the Budapest Museum. Males of albopictus from the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius have been dissected and their terminalia compared with those of other specimens from Southern India, Java, Celebes, the Philippines and Hong Kong. In general they show a rather feeble development of the enlarged spines on the basal lobe of the coxite, but a similar condition is found in other parts of the range and it does not appear to be taxonomically significant. Only one topotypical specimen (a male) is available for comparison. This specimen, like those from Mauritius, shows well-developed white stripes on the undersides of the fore and mid- tibiae and the first mid-tarsus. Similar stripes are shown in various degrees of development by most of the specimens from the Seychelles but a few Seychelles specimens and two from Madagascar (kindly lent by Prof. Peus of the Berlin Museum) appear to be entirely dark. It seems that discrepancies in the literature are due to the fact that this character, besides being sometimes difficult to observe, is variable. Thus ChT Ho (1931), Martini (1931) and Bonne- Wepster & Brug (1932) all describe the tibiae as entirely dark, despite the fact that white stripes of varying degrees of distinctness can be observed in specimens in the British Museum from Malaya (Perak), Sarawak, the Philippines, China (Hong Kong) and Japan. In other respects the Ethiopian specimens agree well with the topotypical one from Calcutta, differing mainly in having the tarsal bands, in general, slightly narrower. This difference is shown best by the first mid-tarsal and the second hind tarsal, which have the basal bands about to J and J to f the length of the segment respectively in the Ethiopian specimens as compared to and f respectively in the Calcutta specimen. All Ethiopian specimens, like the Calcutta specimen, appear to have the hind tibia entirely dark. DISTRIBUTION RECORDS The following list resembles in all respects that given in the first paper of the series. The same abbreviations are employed with one addition, which is as follows : Terv. = Congo Museum, Tervuren. Doubtful records are again marked with an asterisk and these, together with records believed to have been based on misidenti- fications, are discussed separately below (p. 22). Aedes amaltheus N. RHODESIA. Livingstone (De Meillon & Lavoipierre, 1944), Balovale (Robinson, 1948). S. RHODESIA. Bindura*, Darwin*, Shamva* (as poweri, Leeson, 1931), Ndanga* (B.M.). BECHUANALAND. Kasane (De Meillon, 19470). Aedes pseudonigeria ANGOLA. O Wambu (= Nova Lisboa, Theobald, 1910), Bailundo (as wellmani, Theobald, 1910). Rare in Benguela area, common in western Bihe and eastern and central Bailundo (Wellman, MS.). BECHUANALAND. Unnamed locality (as THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION 19 poweri, Edwards, 1912), Botletle River (Edwards, 1941), Francistown (Muspratt, in litt.}. S.W. AFRICA. Otjiwarongo (Edwards, 1924^), Kanovlei, Karabib area*, Okahandja (Muspratt, in litt.}, Okokarara (B.M.). Aedes chaussieri BELGIAN CONGO. Sandoa (Edwards, 19236), Elisabethville (Schwetz, 19276), Keyberg (Elisabethville area, B.M.), Kisanga Gallery Forest (Keyberg, Mattingly & Lips, in press), Lubilash Valley (L.S.H.). N. RHODESIA. Unnamed locality (as africanus, Edwards, 1912), Lake Young (Edwards, 1923 bis), Ndola (B.M.). Aedes masseyi BELGIAN CONGO. Ruwe (as poweri, Theobald, 1910), Elisabethville (Edwards, 1941), Kisanga Gallery Forest (Keyberg, near Elisabethville, Mattingly & Lips, in press). N. RHODESIA. Unnamed locality (as poweri, Neave, 1912), Lake Young (Edwards, 1923 6/s). Aedes keniensis KENYA. Nairobi (as sp. near poweri, V. G. L. Van Someren & De Boer, 1926, as ? masseyi, Edwards, 1941, as keniensis, E. C. C. Van Someren, 1946 6*s), Langata Forest (Garnham, 1949), Fort Hall, Kerugoya, Kiambu (E. C. C. Van Someren, in litt.), Eldoret*, Meru* (as simpsoni, Symes, 1935). TANGANYIKA Njombe* (B.M.). Aedes heischi KENYA. Taveta (E. C. C. Van Someren, 1951), Gede (B.M.), Mombasa, Shimba Hills (E. C. C. Van Someren, in litt.). TANGANYIKA. Dar-es-Salaam* (as pseudo- nigeria, Haworth, 1924), Mombo*, Moshi* (as ? pseudonigeria, Edwards in McHardy, 1932). TRANSVAAL. Magoebaskloof* (as pseudonigeria, Ingram & De Meillon, 1929). Aedes demeilloni ZULULAND. Eshowe (as subargenteus, Bedford, 1928, as deboeri var. demeilloni, Edwards, 1936). NATAL. Amanzimtoti, Impetyeni, Margate (B.M.), Stanger Beach (Muspratt, in litt.), Dukuduku Forest, St. Lucia (Muspratt in litt.). CAPE PROVINCE. Hole-in-the-Wall (as deboeri, De Meillon & Lavoipierre, 1944, fide Muspratt), Port St. Johns (B.M.), Coffee Bay, Embotyi, Keimouth, Mazeppa Bay (Muspratt, in litt.). Aedes kivuensis BELGIAN CONGO. Kibati (as subargenteus ssp. kivuensis, Edwards, 1941). Aedes woodi KENYA. Ganda, Kaloleni (B.M.). NYASALAND. Cholo (Edwards, 1922). MOZAMBIQUE. Vilanculos (Pereira, 1946). 20 THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION Aedes subargenteus KENYA. Taveta (B.M.), Ganda (E. C. C. Van Someren, in litt.}. NYASALAND. Fort Johnston (Edwards, 1925), Ndala Chikoa (Lamborn, in litt.}, Unnamed locality (Lamborn, 1939), Maiwale (B.M.). ZULULAND. Train between Empangeni and Gingindhlovu* (Ingram & De Meillon, 1927), Umfolosi (B.M.), Dukuduku Forest, Emseleni, St. Lucia (Muspratt, in litt.). NATAL. Melville (Muspratt, in litt.). CAPE PROVINCE. Embotyi (B.M.), Port St. Johns (Muspratt, in litt.). Aedes strelitziae ZULULAND. Dukuduku Forest, Richards Bay, St. Lucia (Muspratt, in litt.). NATAL. Margate (Muspratt, 1950), Amanzimtoti (Muspratt, in litt.). CAPE PRO- VINCE. Embotyi, Keimouth, Port St. Johns (Muspratt, in litt.). Aedes poweri NATAL. Unnamed locality (Theobald, 1905). CAPE PROVINCE. Groot Rivier Mouth*, Kologha Forest* (Muspratt, in litt.). Aedes contiguus S. RHODESIA. Mashonaland (as africanus, Theobald, 1901), Salisbury (Edwards, 1936), Ndanga* (B.M.). TRANSVAAL. Onderstepoort, Roberts Heights (as poweri , Bedford, 1928), Letaba*, Leysdorp Road*, Rolle Siding*, Tzaneen* (Ingram & De Meillon, 1929), Johannesburg (Edwards, 1936), Fontainbleau, Pretoria, Riet- fontein, Witkoppen (B.M.), Pietersburg (Liv.). Aedes langata KENYA. Langata Forest (E. C. C. Van Someren, 19460), Nairobi (E. C. C. Van Someren, in litt.). NYASALAND. Maiwale* (H.D.). S.RHODESIA. Salisbury* (as contiguus, Edwards, 1941), Gwelo*, Ndanga (B.M.). Aedes calceatus KENYA. Langata Forest* (as langata, E. C. C. Van Someren, 19460), Ganda (B.M.), Gede, Kwale (E. C. C. Van Someren, in litt.). TANGANYIKA. Lindi (Edwards, 19246). N. RHODESIA. Livingstone (De Meillon & Lavoipierre, 1944). S. RHODESIA. Shamva (Leeson, 1931), Bindura (Edwards, 1941), Darwin (L.S.H.), Chindamora Reserve*, Ndanga* (Meeser, in litt.). ZULULAND. Ishongwe (Muspratt in litt.). Aedes soleatus KENYA. Gede (Bailey, 1947, E. C. C. Van Someren, 1947), Taveta (Heisch, 1948). TANGANYIKA. Dar-es-Salaam, Lindi (Edwards, 19246, Harris, 1942), points between Tanga and Moshi (Harris, 1942). NYASALAND. Mlanje (B.M.). S. RHODESIA. THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION 2 i Shamva (Leeson, 1931), Bindura, Darwin (Edwards, 1941), Chindamora Reserve*, Ndanga* (Meeser, in litt.}. ZULULAND. Dukuduku Forest (Muspratt in litt.}. Aedes apicoargenteus ssp. denderensis BELGIAN CONGO. Costermansville (Wolfs, 1949). RUANDA-URUNDI. Kisenyi* as apicoargenteus, Seydel, ig2ga). Aedes schwetzi BELGIAN CONGO. Elisabethville (Edwards, 1926 ; Schwetz, 1927*1) . He Shashu (Edwards, 1941), Kipushi (L.S.H.), Costermansville* (Wolfs, in litt.}, Panda (Terv.), Lubumbashi River (B.M.). N. RHODESIA. Balovale (Robinson, 1948), Ndola (Robinson, 1950), Lake Bangweulu district, Kasama (B.M.). Aedes deboeri KENYA. Nairobi (as poweri, V. G. L. Van Someren & De Boer, 1926, as deboeri, Edwards, 1926, E. C. C. Van Someren, 19466), Langata Forest (Garnham, 1949), Kiambu, Ngong (E. C. C. Van Someren, in litt.}. TANGANYIKA. Arusha*, Mombo*, Moshi* (Harris, 1942), Marangu* (B.M.). Aedes bambusae BELGIAN CONGO. Kausi & Biega Mountains (Wolfs, in litt.), Kivu Highlands at 3000 metres (B.M.). UGANDA. Saddle between Mt. Mgahinga and Mt. Sabinio (Edwards, 1935), Kanaba (Edwards & Gibbins, 1939), Behungi, Muko (Edwards, 1941), Lugezi (B.M.), Chuya Forest (Haddow, in litt.). Aedes bambusae ssp. kenyae KENYA. Elgeyo Escarpment (as deboeri, Edwards, 1941), Kaimosi Forest, Kisii, Kitale (E. C. C. Van Someren, 19460), Elburgon, Equator, Mau (E. C. C. Van Someren in Garnham et al., 1946), Cheborget, Eldoret, Muhoroni, Taito (E. C. C. Van Someren in litt.), Chagroi Forest (fide Muspratt). Aedes angustus BELGIAN CONGO. Kausi and Biega Mountains (Wolfs, in litt.). UGANDA. Saddle between Mt. Mgahinga and Mt. Sabinio (Edwards, 1935), Muko (Edwards & Gibbins, 1939), Chuya Forest (Haddow, in litt.). Aedes ruwenzori UGANDA. Bunguha, Kabingo, Kakuka, Kizimba (Haddow & E. C. C. Van Someren, 1950). Aedes mascarensis MAURITIUS. Pamplemousses*, Reduit (MacGregor, 1924), Corps de Garde, Unnamed localities (B.M.). 22 THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION Aedes vinsoni sp. n. MAURITIUS. Moka (B.M.). Aedes granti SOKOTRA. Unnamed locality (Theobald, 1901), Mouri (Leeson & Theodor, 1948). Aedes albopictus FR. SOMALILAND. Boat off Djibouti* (as scutellaris Walker, Doreau, 1909). AMIRANTE Is. Desroche I. (as scutellaris, Theobald, 1912 bis). SEYCHELLES Is. Unnamed localities on Coetivy, Dennis and Mahe Islands, Anse aux Pins, Capucin, Cascade Estate, Long Island, Morne Blanc, Porte Victoria, unnamed localities on Praslin and Silhouette Islands (all as scutellaris, Theobald, 1912 bis), Porte Victoria region and unnamed localities on Mahe Island (Harper, 1947). MAURITIUS. Un- named localities (as Culex albopictus, De Grandpre & De Charmoy, 1900, as scutellaris, Theobald, 1905 bis, as Aedes albopictus, Edwards, 1920). "Everywhere on the island from sea-level to the highest altitude," Flat Island, Gabriel Island (MacGregor, 1927). MADAGASCAR. Ankasobe, Diego Suarez, Majunga (as lamberti Ventrillon, Ventrillon, 1904), unnamed localities (as scutellaris, Legendre, 1918, as albopictus, Edwards, 1941), Antananarivo (as lamberti, Enderlein, 1921). REUNION. St. Denis (Edwards, 1920), Ste. Rose (B.M.). DOUBTFUL RECORDS Aedes amaltheus S. RHODESIA. Ndanga. This record is based on one female only and therefore requires confirmation. The records from Bindura, Darwin and Shamva (as poweri, Leeson, 1931) can no longer be confirmed from specimens. The possibility that they refer to amaltheus is discussed below under zoogeography. Aedes psetidonigeria S.W. AFRICA. Karabib area. This record is discussed above under Taxonomy. Aedes keniensis KENYA. Eldoret, Mem (as simpsoni, Symes, 1935). As noted in the previous paper, records of simpsoni from above about 5000 ft. in Kenya are probably the result of misidentification. The true identity of the species concerned can no longer be confirmed from specimens, but Mrs. Van Someren has suggested (in lift.) that they may have been keniensis, and this seems very probable. TANGANYIKA. Njombe (B.M.). This record is based on two females only and therefore requires confirmation. One specimen is, however, in perfect condition and seems typical. Both have a number of pale scales below at the base of the hind tibia as mentioned by Mrs. Van Someren (1946, bis) for some Kenya specimens, and one has two or THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION 23 three white scales forming a very small white spot beyond half-way on the anterior surface of the mid femur. Aedes heischi TANGANYIKA. Dar-es-Salaam (as pseudonigeria, Haworth, 1924). There is one female specimen of Haworth's in the British Museum apparently belonging to this species, but its identity requires confirmation. Mombo, Moshi (as ? pseudonigeria, Edwards in McHardy, 1932). The identification of these specimens seems to have given Edwards considerable trouble, and it is not clear whether he came to any final decision about them. No specimens have been preserved. On the basis of our present knowledge an attribution to heischi seems possible but specimens are badly needed from this area. (See also under deboeri below.) TRANSVAAL. Magoe- baskloof (as pseudonigeria, Ingram & De Meillon, 1929). This record is based on a whole larva and a larval and a pupal pelt in the British Museum. The larvae appear to be indistinguishable from those of heischi but adults are required for confirmation, since it is possible that we may be dealing with an undescribed species of the demeilloni group. Aedes subargenteus ZULULAND. Train between Empangeni and Gingindhlovu (Ingram & De Meillon, 1927). The British Museum has a specimen which is marked as taken in a caboose at Umfolosi in March, 1927, and presented by Dr. Ingram. It is almost certainly the specimen to which this record refers. Umfolosi does not, however, lie between Empangeni and Gingindhlovu, but is a few miles up the line from Empangeni. Aedes poweri CAPE PROVINCE. Groot Rivier Mouth, Kologha Forest (Muspratt, in litt.}. Specimens have not as yet been received for comparison with the type, but from Mr. Muspratt 's description the assignation to poweri seems a reasonable one. It will, however, be necessary to have males and early stages from Natal before the identity of the Cape Province with the topotypic form can be fully established. Aedes contiguus TRANSVAAL. Letaba, Leysdorp Road, Rolle Siding, Tzaneen (as poweri, Ingram & De Meillon, 1929). There is no evidence that, in reassigning Ingram and De Meillon's material, Edwards (1941) saw specimens from anywhere but Johannesburg and Pretoria. Records from below 3000 ft. are therefore still open to question, and it is preferred to ignore them in considering the distribution of contiguus until they can be confirmed. Dr. De Meillon kindly sent the remaining material (one specimen each from Letaba and Tzaneen), but, as these specimens are reduced to the thorax only, their identity cannot be confirmed. S. RHODESIA. Ndanga (B.M.). This record is based on a unique female and therefore requires confirmation. 24 THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION Aedes langata NYASALAND. Maiwale (H.D.). This record is based on one female only and therefore requires confirmation. S. RHODESIA. Salisbury (as contiguus, Edwards, 1941). This record is based on two badly rubbed females and requires confirmation. The record from Gwelo is discussed above under Taxonomy. Aedes calceatus KENYA. Langata Forest (as langata, E. C. C. Van Someren, 1946^). This record is discussed above under " Taxonomy." S. RHODESIA. Chindamora Reserve, Ndanga (Meeser, in litt.}. No specimens from either locality are available for examination and these records must therefore be regarded as provisional. Aedes soleatus S. RHODESIA. Chindamora Reserve, Ndanga (Meeser, in litt.). No specimens from either locality are available for examination and these records must therefore be regarded as provisional. Aedes apicoargenteus ssp. denderensis RUANDA-URUNDI. Kisenyi (as apicoargenteus, Seydel, 19290). Monsieur Seydel informs me that no specimens are now available, and there appears to be no means of deciding whether the record should be attributed to the type form or the subspecies. Aedes schwetzi BELGIAN CONGO. He Shashu (Edwards, 1941), Costermansville (Wolfs, in litt.). These records are discussed under Zoogeography. Aedes deboeri TANGANYIKA. Arusha, Mombo, Moshi (Harris, 1942). These records cannot now be confirmed. They may perhaps have referred to heischi. Mr. Swaine kindly sent some of Harris's specimens from the laboratory at Morogoro but they were unfortunately destroyed in transit. The record from Marangu is discussed above under " Taxonomy." Aedes mascarensis MAURITIUS. Pamplemousses (MacGregor, 1924). This record was based on a casual observation of a mosquito in flight and is therefore open to question. Aedes albopictus FR. SOMALILAND. Boat off Djibouti (as scutellaris, Doreau, 1909). This record was based on a casual observation and there is no means of confirming it. THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION 25 RECORDS BASED ON MISIDENTIFICATIONS A edes pseudonigeria KENYA. Nairobi (V. G. L. Van Someren & De Boer, 1926). This record appears to have been based on a larva which is now in the British Museum. It belongs to a species of Aedimorphus. TANGANYIKA. Dar-es-Salaam (Haworth, 1924), Mombo, Moshi (Edwards in McHardy, 1932). It is most improbable, on distributional grounds, that these attributions can have been correct. The species concerned is here provisionally taken to be heischi, but it might have been deboeri or soleatus. Specimens from all these localities would be very welcome. TRANSVAAL. Magoe- baskloof (Ingram & De Meillon, 1929). See above, in the section on Taxonomy, under heischi. ZULULAND. Eshowe (Ingram & De Meillon, 1927). This record was based on the material subsequently taken by Edwards (1936) as the type series of demeilloni. In addition to demeilloni it contains one specimen of dendrophilus (Mattingly, 1952). A edes demeilloni UGANDA. Mongiro (Smithburn & Haddow, 1946), Mamirimiri (Haddow et al., 1947), KENYA. Kaimosi Forest (E. C. C. Van Someren, 1946). All these records refer to dendrophilus (Mattingly, 1952). ZULULAND. Eshowe (Edwards, 1936). This material contained one specimen of dendrophilus (Mattingly, 1952). Aedes poweri BELGIAN CONGO. Kabinda (Schwetz, 19276) = apicoargenteus, Ruwe (Theobald, 1910) = masseyi. KENYA. Unnamed locality (Neave, 1912) = sp. indet., Nairobi (V. G. L. Van Someren & De Boer, 1926) = deboeri. N. RHODESIA. Unnamed locality (Neave, 1912) = masseyi from Lake Young. TRANSVAAL. Roberts Heights (Bedford, 1928) = contiguus. BECHUANALAND. Unnamed locality (Edwards, 1912) = pseudonigeria from Botletle River. Aedes scutellaris All records from the Ethiopian Region (Doreau, 1909 ; Theobald, 1912 bis ; Legendre, 1918) appear to refer to albopictus. UNIDENTIFIED AND MISQUOTED LOCALITIES. ANGOLA. O Wambu (Aedes pseudonigeria, Theobald, 1910). Apparently a version of Huambo which as Mr. Exell of this Museum has kindly informed me, is an old name for Nova Lisboa. TRANSVAAL. Pietersburg, Rietfontein (Aedes contiguus, B.M. & Liv.). There are several places with these names in the Transvaal. In the list of localities (p. 26) I have included what appear to be the largest places with the appropriate names. 26 THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION DISTRIBUTION OUTSIDE THE ETHIOPIAN REGION Aedes albopictus. South Georgia* (probably cretinus or a nearly related species (lindtropi Schingarew), see Stackelberg, 1937), Chagos Archipelago and throughout Oriental Region, N.E. China to Manchurian border, Japan to 40 N., Ryuku Islands, Formosa, Mariana Islands, Dutch New Guinea*, Serang*, Timor*, Hawaiian Islands. Temporarily established in Port Darwin, where it apparently did not persist. Records from Polynesia are incorrect. (Theobald, 1912 bis ; Rhoudkhadze, 1926 ; Kumm, 19316 ; Barraud, 1931 ; Feng, 19380 ; Bohart & Ingram, 1946 ; Farner et al., 1946 ; Brug & Bonne- Wepster, 1947 ; Chow, 1949, 1950). Records marked with an asterisk are doubtful and require confirmation. LIST OF LOCALITIES WITH TOPOGRAPHICAL DETAILS The remarks made in connection with the list of localities published in the first paper of this series (Mattingly, 1952) apply equally to the present one. Altitudes are again given in feet, where possible to the nearest 100 ft., otherwise to the nearest 5ooft., and rainfalls as the mean annual total to the nearest 5 inches. Figures enclosed in brackets have been read from maps or, in the case of some rainfalls, refer to an adjacent station. Details of localities included in the previous list are not repeated. LIST OF LOCALITIES Locality. Ankasobe, Madagascar Anse aux Pins, Seychelles . Antananarivo, Madagascar Arusha, Tanganyika . Bailundo, Angola Behungi, Uganda Benguela, Angola Botletle River, Bechuanaland Bunguha, Uganda . Capucin Point, Seychelles . Cascade Estate, Seychelles Chagroi Forest, Kenya Cheborget, Kenya Chindamora Reserve, S. Rho- desia ..... Cholo, Nyasaland Chuya Forest, Uganda Coetivy I., Seychelles Coffee Bay, Cape Prov. Mt. Corps de Garde, Mauritius . Darwin, S. Rhodesia . Dennis I., Seychelles Desroche I., Amirantes Diego Suarez, Madagascar . Djibouti, Fr. Somaliland . Altitude (4.5oo) 4,600 4,600 (5.500) (8,000) <5o (3,000) (6,000) <5oo 1,000 (6,000) (6,200) (4,5oo) 3,000 (5-8,000) <5oo <5oo 2,400 3,100 <5oo <5 00 <5oo Latitude 18.20 S. 4.41 S. 18.58 S. 3-25 s. (12.158.) 1.15 S. 12.358. 2O. 12 S. (o. 43 N.) (4.488.) (4.41 S.) (0.308.) 0.358. (17-308.) (16.058.) (1.158.) (7.168.) 31.588. 20.16 S. 16.40 S. (3.488.) (5.508.) 12.10 S. n. 34 N. Longitude 47.10 E. 55-32E. 47-30E. 36.45 E. (i6.5oE.) 29.48 E. 13.26 E. 24.20 E. (30.07 E.) (55-33E.) (55.29E.) (35.ioE.) 35.ioE. (31.20 E.) (35-o 4 E.) (29.45 E.) (56.I6E.) 29.18 E. 57-27E. 31 .30 E. (55-42E.) (53-54E.) 49.20 E. 43.09 E. Rainfall (55) (90) (60) 45 (70) (55) (10) 15 (60) (90) (100) (55) (55) (35) 60 (50) (90) (45) (65) 25 (90) (90) (45) (5) THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION 27 LIST Locality. Dukuduku Forest, Zululand Elburgon, Kenya Elgeyo Escarpment, Kenya Emseleni, Zululand . Equator, Kenya Flat I., Mauritius Fontainbleau, Transvaal. See Johannesburg. Gabriel I., Mauritius Ganda, Kenya .... Gingindhlovu, Zululand Groot Rivier Mouth, Cape Prov. Hole-in-the-Wall, Cape Prov. He Shashu, Belgian Congo . Impetyeni Forest, Natal Ishongwe, Zululand . Johannesburg, Transvaal . Kabingo, Uganda Kakuka, Uganda Kaloleni, Kenya Kanaba, Uganda Kanovlei, S.W. Africa Kasama, N. Rhodesia Kausi and Biega Mts., Belgian Congo ..... Keimouth, Cape Province . Kerugoya, Kenya Keyberg, Belgian Congo. See Elisabeth ville. Kibati, Belgian Congo Kipushi, Belgian Congo Kizimba, Uganda Kologha Forest, Cape Prov. Kwale, Kenya .... Long I., Seychelles . Lubilash Valley, Belgian Congo . Lubumbashi R., Belgian Congo . Lugezi, Uganda Magoebaskloof, Transvaal . Mahe I., Seychelles . Maiwale, Nyasaland . Majunga, Madagascar Marangu, Tanganyika Mau, Kenya .... Mazeppa Bay, Cape Prov. . Melville, Natal .... Mt. Mgahinga, Uganda Mkanduli, Cape Province . Mlanje, Nyasaland . Moka, Mauritius Mombo, Tanganyika . OF LOCALITIES (cont.) Altitude Latitude <5 28.24 S. 7,900 (o.iSS.) 8,000 i. oo N. <5o (27.258.) 9,000 oo.oo <5 (19.528.) <5oo (19.538.) <5 (3.138.) <5 (29.01 S.) <5oo (33.588.) <5 32.07 S. 4,800 (2.02 S.) (4.5<>o) . (30.40 S.) (500) 27.25 S. 5.9oo 26.11 S. 6,500 0.12 N. 7,000 0.35N. <5oo 3-058. (7.5oo) . 1.238. (4,000) 19.15 S. 4,400 10.10 S. 6,500 2 . 20 S. <5oo (32.41 S.) (5,000) . 0.30 S. 6,500 1.348. (4,000) (11.478.) (6,000) 0.39N. (4-5,000) . (32.308.) (500) . 4.10 S. <5 (4.378.) (2,500) . (9.35S.) (4,000) (11.308.) 7.5oo 1.25 S. 3.500 . (23.528.) (0-3,000) 4-45 S. 3,200 (14.258.) <5 15.408. 4,600 3.198. 8,300 o.io S. <5 (32.308.) 500 30.398. (4-9,000) . (1.238.) (2,000) 31.468. 4,100 (16.07 S.) 1,100 20.13 8. 1,400 4.528. Longitude 3 2.i8E (35-5'E.) 35-ioE. (32.30E.) 35-34 E. (57-39E.) (57.41 E.) (40.03 E.) (3I-38E.) (25.03 E.) 29.15 E. (28.55E.) (29-35E.) 32.25 E. 28.04 E. 29.58E. 30.01 E. 39-38E. 29.58 E. 19.20 E. 3i.2 3 E. 28.40 E. (28.22E.) 37.16 E. 29. 16 E. (2 7 .I 5 E.) 30.04 E. (27.20 E.) 39.32 E. (55-3IE.) (24.07 E.) (27.20 E.) 29-34E. (30.02 E.) 55-3E. (35-I7E.) 46.20 E. 37-33 E. 35-40 E. (28.35E.) 30.31 E. (29.39 E.) 28. 43 E. (35.47 E.) 57-30E. 38.14 E. Rainfall 40 45 45 (40) 50 (40) (40) (45) 45 (40) (45) (55) (50) (30) 35 (45) (65) (30) (55) (20) 50 (60) (40) (50) (60) 45 (55) 40 40 (90) (55) (50) (60) (35) (85-150) (25) (60) (50) 55 (50) 40 (60) 25 70 (70) 35 28 THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION LIST Locality. Morne Blanc, Seychelles Mouri, Sokotra Muko, Uganda .... Ndala Chikoa, Nyasaland . Ngong, Kenya . < . Njombe, Tanganyika Okokarara, S.W. Africa Otjiwarongo, S.W. Africa . Pamplemousses, Mauritius Panda, Belgian Congo = Jadot- ville. Porte Victoria, Seychelles . Praslin I., Seychelles Reduit, Mauritius Richards Bay, Zululand Rietfontein, Transvaal Rolle Siding, Transvaal Ruwe, Belgian Congo Mt. Sabinio, Uganda St. Denis, Reunion . St. Lucia, Zululand . Ste. Rose, Reunion . Sandoa, Belgian Congo Shimba Hills, Kenya Silhouette I., Seychelles Stanger Beach, Natal Taito, Kenya . Umfolosi, Zululand . Vilanculos, Mozambique Witkoppen, Transvaal. See Johannesburg. OF LOCALITIES (cont.). Altitude Latitude 800 <5oo 7,500 (1,600) 6,400 6,000 (4,5oo) 4,800 <50o (0-1,300) (1,000) <5oo 5,400 i, 600 (4,000) (4-12,000) <5o <5 00 2,900 1,000 (0-2,500) (6,500) (4.398.) (I2. 3 6N.) (1.138.) (14.10 S.) 1.188. 9.20 S. 20.35 S. (20.27 S.) (20.09 S.) 4-308. (4.198.) (20.12 S.) 28.388. 26.09 S. (24.498.) 10.41 S. i .25 S. 20.55 8. (28.308.) (21 .07 S.) 9.398. 4.138. (4.288.) (29.20 S.) 0.258. 28.25 S. 22.29 S. Longitude (55-27E.) (53-59E.) (29.50E.) (35.05 E.) 36.40 E. 3 4 . 4 6E. 17.27 E. (i6. 39 E.) (57-35 E.) 55-29E. (55.43 E.) (57-33E.) 32.04 E. 28.11 E. ( 3 i.o 7 E.) 25-35E. 29.34 E. 55-30E. (32.25 E.) (55-50E.) 22.44 E. 39.26E. (55.i 4 E.) ( 3 I,.20E.) 35-I5E. 32.i 4 E. 34-51 E. Rainfall (i oo) (15) (55) (25) 35 40 (20) (15) (50) 85 (90-120) (60) 45 (30) (20) 45 (60) >IOO (35) >IOO (50) (45) (90-140) (40) (65) 45 25 BIONOMICS IN RELATION TO DISTRIBUTION General considerations have already been discussed (Mattingly, 1952), and accor- dingly all that is attempted here is a presentation of the available data. BREEDING-PLACES. The same classification into " Preferred " and " Occasional " is adopted as in the previous paper. Aedes amaltheus. Known only from tree-holes (De Meillon & Lavoipierre, 1944). Aedes pseudonigeria. De Meillon's larvae from S.W. Africa were found in tree-holes. Aedes chaussieri. Breeding-places unknown. Aedes masseyi. Breeding-places unknown. Aedes keniensis. Known only from tree-holes (E. C. C. Van Someren, 1946 bis). Aedes heischi. Known only from tree-holes (E. C. C. Van Someren, 1951 ; Lumsden, in lift.). Aedes demeilloni. Preferred. Dracaena axils (Hopkins, 1936 ; Muspratt, in litt.). Occasional. Bamboos (Ingram & De Meillon, MS. It seems possible, however, that this may have referred to dendrophilus) , banana THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION 29 and Sirelitzia axils (Muspratt, in Hit.}. Aedes subargenteus. Known only from tree-holes (Hopkins, 1936). Pondoland larvae, like the paedotype, were obtained from gravid wild-caught females (Muspratt, in litt.}. Aedes kivuensis. Breeding- places unknown. Aedes woodi. Breeding-places unknown. Aedes strelitziae. Preferred. Axils of Strelitzia nicholai (Muspratt, 1950). Occasional. Axils of cultivated banana (Muspratt, 1950), Dracaena axils (Muspratt, in litt.}. Aedes poweri. Breeding-places unknown. Cape Province larvae have been obtained from gravid females (Muspratt, in litt.}. Aedes contiguus. Preferred. Probably tree-holes. Occasional. A rot-hole in a paw-paw tree. Pandanus axils, a snail shell (Hopkins, 1936). Aedes langata. Known only from tree-holes (E. C. C. Van Someren, 1946 ; Meeser, MS.). Aedes calceatus. Preferred. Tree-holes (Muspratt, 1945). Occasional. Crowns of coconut palms (Haworth, 1924. The findings of Lester (1927) and Wiseman et al. (1939), however, appear to prove conclusively that the record was due to introduction by a native collector), utensils (Muspratt, 1945), bamboo pot in a tree (E. C. C. Van Someren, MS.). Aedes soleatus. Preferred. probably tree-holes (Harris, 1942 ; Lumsden, in litt.}. Occasional. Crowns of coconut palms (Haworth, 1924, but see above under calceatus}, bamboo stumps (Harris, 1942), bamboo pots set up as traps (Bailey, 1947). Aedes apicoargenteus ssp. denderensis. Known only from a tree-hole (Wolfs, 1949). Aedes schwetzi. Preferred. Tree-holes and bamboo stumps (Robinson, in litt.}. Occasional. A tin, a hole in cement, a tub (Schwetz, 19270). Aedes deboeri. Known only from tree- holes (Harris, 1942 ; E. C. C. Van Someren, 1946 bis}. Aedes bambusae. Known only from bored bamboos (Hopkins, 1936). Aedes bambusae ssp. kenyae. Tree- holes, rock-holes, bamboo pots (Garnham et al., 1946). Aedes angustus. Known only from bored bamboos (Hopkins, 1936). The compressed thorax suggests that it is specially adapted to this type of habitat. Aedes ruwenzori. Breeding-places unknown. Despite the compressed thorax all attempts to find larvae in bamboos have failed. (Haddow & Van Someren, 1950). Larvae have been obtained from wild-caught gravid females (Gillett, 19516). Aedes mascarensis. Known only from tree-holes (MacGregor, 1924). Aedes vinsoni. Breeding-places unknown. Aedes granti. Known only from wells (Leeson & Theodor, 1948). Aedes albopictus. Common in tree-holes, cut bamboos, leaf axils and coconut shells, rare in ground pools, rock-holes and utensils (Earner et al., 1946). MacGregor (1927) differs in recording it as common in rock-holes in Mauritius, but it should be noted that the term " rock-hole " may connote two very distinct types of breeding-place (Mattingly, 1952). Chow (1950) infers that it is common in artificial water containers in Formosa, and again it may be noted that the term " utensils " may include a number of quite distinct ecological niches. Bick (1949) records it as commoner in artificial containers than in tree-holes. SEASONAL DISTRIBUTION So little is known about the species dealt with in the present paper that almost nothing can be added to the summary already given (Mattingly, 1952). For some brief notes on Aedes bambusae kenyae see Garnham et al. (1946). For Aedes deboeri 3 o THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION see Garnham, 1949, and for Aedes calceatus and schwetzi see Robinson, 1950. Aedes albopictus is of special interest because of its more northerly occurrence in the Far East than in the case of Aedes aegypti or most other species of the sub-genus. The most northerly record of albopictus appears to be from Pekin where it was found in early September (Ch'i Ho, 1931). This record seems to be a very exceptional one, and it is doubtful whether it indicates an indigenous population. Feng (1935), however, records it as the commonest day-time-biting mosquito a little further south in Shantung Province. Lamborn (1922) notes its almost complete absence from Shanghai during a cold spell when the mean daily temperature was 61 F. Many authors record it as most abundant during the rainy season, and Senior White (1934) states that it occurs in Calcutta only at this time. The figures given by the latter author are very small, but they seem to indicate that it makes its appearance well after the beginning of the rains. The same author (1920) records it as abundant throughout the year in Ceylon. BITING-HABITS As in the previous paper of this series the subject of biting-habits is taken, for convenience, to include that of vertical distribution. The following species seem likely to bite man at least on occasion. Aedes amaltheus. A few specimens were taken biting on the forest floor at Kasane (De Meillon, 1947^). Aedes pseudonigeria. Wellman, in an unpublished letter to Austen, describes this as a " persistent and vicious biter." One specimen in the British Museum, probably the one referred to by Theobald (1910), is marked as taken out of doors in a village at 5 p.m. and as a common domestic mosquito biting by day. Others are marked as taken at house or tent lamps at 8 p.m. Mr. Muspratt informs me that this species was taken biting by De Meillon in S.W. Africa. Aedes chaussieri. The single specimen from Ndola was taken biting at dusk (Robinson, in Hit.}. It seems probable that some at least of the Congo specimens were also taken biting. Aedes masseyi. It seems probable that adults in the British Museum were taken biting. Aedes keniensis. In a long series of catches in the Langata Forest Garnham (1949) took only one specimen biting. Aedes demeilloni. De Meillon and Lavoipierre (1944) took a single specimen biting in forest at Mkanduli. Aedes subargenteus. In an unpublished report very kindly sent by Dr. Lamborn he records this species as biting very viciously in dense woodland at about n a.m., and again in the afternoon near Ndala Chikoa. Lumsden (in lift.) records it as biting at Taveta both on the forest floor and in the canopy. Aedes kivuensis. The only known specimen was presumably taken biting, but there is no definite infor- mation on this point. Aedes woodi. The Mozambique specimen was taken biting (Pereira, 1946), and Mrs. Van Someren states (in litt.) that specimens are easily obtained in the bush at Ganda. There is no information concerning the type specimen. Aedes strelitziae. This is noted by Muspratt (1950) as a more persistent daytime biter than simpsoni. Aedes poweri. Muspratt states (in litt.) that he took a number of females biting in the Kologha Forest. Aedes contiguus. Bedford (1928) records specimens (as poweri) attempting to bite at Onderstepoort. Ingram & De Meillon (1929) give larval records only. Aedes soleatus. Bailey (1947) took THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION 31 adults on a number of occasions in forest. Lumsden (in litt.) has records of biting on the ground in bush. Aedes deboeri. Garnham (1949) found this to be the prin- cipal man-biting Aedes in the Langata Forest. Aedes bambusae. Edwards (1935) records the capture of a few adults and Haddow states (in litt.} that he observed biting in the Chuya Forest. Aedes bambusae kenyae. Garnham et al. (1946) took " a few adults only " in the Kaimosi Forest. They also took some adults in houses at Kisii. Aedes angustus. Haddow states (in litt.) that he took this as a tree-top biter in the Chuya Forest. Edwards (1935) appears to have taken it only in the larval stage but he is not very clear on this point. Aedes ruwenzori. Haddow and Van Someren (1950) note this as a man-biting species markedly arboreal and crepuscular in its habits. Aedes mascarensis. MacGregor (1927) states that " it readily attacks man but is not very persistent in its attack, and it is easily frightened off completely." Aedes vinsoni. The only known specimen was taken in a house. Aedes granti. Described by Grant as being " very troublesome " (Forbes, 1903). Aedes albopictus. There is general agreement among observers from various parts of the range that this species prefers to bite by day in the shade. Night biting, though not unknown, is comparatively rare. Although readily entering houses in search of blood it is less domesticated than Aedes aegypti (Bonne- Wepster & Brug, 1932, and others) and a number of authors (e.g., Bohart & Ingram, 1946) record it as particularly abundant in woodlands. In the Ethiopian Region Harper (1947) notes that it attacks man readily in the Seychelles and MacGregor's account of its behaviour is typical. This author states (1927) that in Mauritius it is a " voracious and persistent biter in houses, while in woods and forests it frequently attacks in swarms." Aedes heischi, langata, calceatus, denderensis and schwetzi are not on record as biting man. The available data regarding the biting cycle have been included in the above summary. Concerning vertical distribution relatively little is known. The only species which have been recorded as definitely acrodendrophilic are deboeri (Garn- ham, 1949), ruwenzori (Haddow & Van Someren, 1950), bambusae and angustus (Haddow, in litt.). Lumsden states (in litt.) that subargenteus has been taken biting in the canopy but does not indicate whether it is more abundant there than on the ground. Forms which seem definitely to prefer the ground are bambusae kenyae (Garnham et al., 1946) and soleatus (Bailey, 1947 ; Lumsden in litt.). With respect to the vertical distribution of breeding-places we have only the observations of Garnham et al. (1946), who obtained bambusae kenyae larvae from bamboo pots at all heights up to 60 ft. (the greatest height investigated), and Bailey (1947), who obtained soleatus larvae from ground level up to 36 ft. (the greatest height inves- tigated). ZOOGEOGRAPHY Owing to the relative paucity of records this subject cannot be discussed in as much detail as in the case of species occurring in the West African Sub-region. In spite of this, however, the conjectural distributional areas of most species, as calcu- lated empirically from such records as are available, seem reasonably consistent. 32 THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION In comparing the two sub-regions the most striking difference is the very much greater diversity of the East and South African fauna. Thus only one species (pseudoafricanus) appears to be entirely confined to the West African Sub-region, although two others, apicoargenteus and fraseri, have such a limited extension outside it that they may reasonably be treated as West African. Even africanus, with its vast extension in the Guinean forests, is not clearly West African in origin, though it may be thought that the available evidence, such as it is, suggests an original home in the Uganda savanna. Aedes dendrophilus, though now probably more widespread in the West African savannas than in any other part of its range, is clearly an ancient species with formerly a much wider extension, and there is nothing to indicate in which part of its range it originated. The remaining West African species are either so widespread as to belong to neither sub-region in par- ticular (luteocephalus, vittatus), or mainly South and East African with minor incur- sions into the West African savannas (metallicus, unilineatus) , or have been so widely distributed by man that their natural distribution has been obscured (simpsoni, possibly South African ; aegypti, possibly non-ethiopian). In short, the available evidence, meagre though it is, would appear to suggest that the West African Stego- myia fauna has been almost entirely derived from that of the surrounding highlands and savannas. This view is also supported by the rather dubious evidence to be derived from morphological resemblances between present-day species. As against this the East and South African Sub-region possesses no less than 27 species, which, as far as we know, are entirely confined within its limits in addition to such others as may be presumed to be at present undiscovered. Rhodesian Highland species. Chapin's Rhodesian Highland District has two indigenous species, chaussieri and masseyi, the latter with a close relative, keniensis, in the East African Highland District (Fig. i). The record of chaussieri from the Lubilash valley suggests that it may perhaps occur in the Southern Congo Savanna District, in which case it would qualify for inclusion among the West African species, but this record is too imprecise for there to be any certainty on the point, and it has seemed best to treat it in the present paper, since it is clear that, in any case, its main area of distribution is almost certainly in the Rhodesian Highlands. Present records would suggest that both species are confined to the north-eastern part of the district, but it is probable that in fact both extend for a considerable distance westwards into Angola, since, apart from the Bihe plateau, this part of Africa is as yet entirely uncollected. The Bihe plateau is probably above the altitudinal limits of either species, since neither is at present known from above 4,000 or at most 4,500 ft. The southward extension of both species would seem to be very limited to judge by the negative record from Balovale. It is not clear whether the operative factor here is rainfall or altitude since the two are closely correlated in this area. The occurrence of chaussieri below 3,000 ft. on the northern face of the plateau, if this could be confirmed, would suggest that rainfall is the effective limiting factor, and in this case both species would probably have rainfall limits resembling those of africanus, Balovale, being a borderline locality. Keniensis seems clearly to be a highland form of masseyi, which it very closely resembles. The record from Fort Hall suggests that in the northern part of its range it may THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION 33 occur below 4,500 ft., but this is a locality associated with very abrupt changes of altitude, and in its present form the record is too imprecise to be of value. It is also possible that masseyi may be precluded from the main distributional area of keniensis by inadequate rainfall (Njombe, like Balovale, has an average rainfall of 40 in., with 6 dry months). The precise limits of these two species and of amaltheus in Northern Rhodesia would be an interesting study, particularly if further light t-0 FIG. i. Distribution of Rhodesian Highland species and of Aed.es keniensis. could be thrown on their relationships by the discovery of early stages and males of masseyi. Among those Rhodesian species which apparently extend into adjacent fauna! districts is Aedes schwetzi (Fig. 2). The only records of this species from outside the district are, however, two from the Costermansville area, and these cannot be finally accepted until specimens are available for examination. Wolfs states (in litt.) that only one specimen has been taken in Costermansville itself, and it seems possible that it may be more abundant at the slightly lower level of He Shashu. The record from this island is due to Edwards, but the condition of his material is ENTOM. in, i. 3 34 THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION unknown. The relationship of schwetzi to apicoargenteus has already been discussed, and it has been pointed out that the latter does not appear to occur above 3,500 ft., at most, along the northern edge of the Rhodesian plateau. In this part of its range schwetzi is not known from below about 4,000 ft. although further south, at Balovale, it apparently occurs at about 3,400 ft. It appears therefore that the 3,500- ft. contour may be taken as a good approximate boundary between the two species. It will be seen when the East African Highland and the East African Lowland Districts are discussed that this is a very significant altitude over a large part of Africa, bearing comparison with the 6,ooo-ft. contour on Ruwenzori and in the FIG. 2. Distribution of Aedes schwetzi and allied forms. Kavirondo and other montane areas (Mattingly, 1952). It is possible that it may prove to be a critical altitude for apicoargenteus along the western face of the Uganda plateau since, as already noted, the latter is associated with aberrant forms of this species. It is not, however, absolutely preclusive here, as it appears to be further south. As in the case of masseyi and chaussieri the rainfall limits of schwetzi are difficult to assess, but there seems to be no reason to doubt that they are approxi- mately the same as those of apicoargenteus. It is interesting to note that schwetzi was found at Balovale at a time when africanus was apparently absent from there, since there is also some indication that apicoargenteus may be slightly more drought- resistant than africanus (Mattingly, 1952). Together with Aedes schwetzi it is convenient to mention the closely related apicoargenteus ssp. denderensis, although the latter is at present known with certainty only from the Kivu highlands and is thus a purely East African Highland species. THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION 35 Since it is known only from Costermansville little can be said here about its distri- bution, but it seems reasonable to suppose that it is a highland form of apicoargenteus restricted to the Kivu region and perhaps to neighbouring areas of comparable altitude, e.g., in Ruanda-Urundi. The record from Kisenyi cannot be assigned with certainty as between the type form and sub-species since the distribution of the former in Tanganyika is uncertain, while the altitude (4,800 ft.) would probably not preclude it at this latitude (see Mattingly, 1952, fig. 7). In view of the resem- blance between the larvae of denderensis and calceatus, which suggests some affinity with the East African Lowland fauna, even if a remote one, it would be particularly interesting to know more about the distribution of the former. Unfortunately, however, the Stegomyia fauna of Ruanda-Urundi is at present almost completely unknown. \ .Apparently restricted to the southern and western parts of the Rhodesian Highland District are the very interesting species amaltheus and pseudonigeria, which also extend into the south-east veld and south-west arid districts respectively (Figs. 3, 4). In the southern part of its range pseudonigeria appears to be restricted to an area having only 10 to 20 in. of rain in the year. It is rather surprising therefore that it should also be known from the Bihe plateau, where the rainfall is much higher. It seems virtually certain that it does not extend into the eastern part of the Rhodesian Highland District, since it is a vicious man-biter and could hardly have been missed in such well collected areas as Elisabethville and Ndola. It seems reasonable to conclude that the Bihe form is a distinct sub-species, and that it is probably restricted to altitudes of the order of 5,000 ft. and over (Fig. 3). Unfor- tunately the available material is quite inadequate for a proper comparative study of the two forms. It would seem that the S.W. African form is also a highland mosquito, since it is not known from below about 3,000 ft. Aedes amaltheus is at present known only from a very restricted range of altitudes between about 3,000 and 4,000 ft. The lowest mean annual rainfall with which it is associated is about 20 in. and the highest about 40 in. If these are in fact the distri- butional limits then the population occurring in the more low-lying parts of Southern Rhodesia would seem to be separated from that occupying the main part of the range by the width of the Zambesi valley at Livingstone (Fig. 4). As in the case of the southern boundary of masseyi and chaussieri it is not clear whether the northern boundary of this species is to be equated with the 4O-in. isohyet or the 4,ooo-ft. altitudinal contour since the two run close together. This is unfortunate, since the question of possible upper rainfall limits in Stegomyia is an interesting one. It can only be hoped that the very scanty records from this area will before long be supplemented. In the meantime there seems little reason to doubt that the main distributional area of amaltheus covers a large part of southern Angola (not shown in Fig. 4, which covers only the eastern part of the putative range), together with the south-western part of Northern Rhodesia and parts of northern Bechuana- land and Ovamboland. De Meillon & Lavoipierre (1944) express surprise that so striking a species should previously have been overlooked, but in point of fact there were no previous Stegomyia records at that time from any part of the main distri- butional area as here defined. There were, however, some records from Bindura 36 THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION and Shamva in Southern Rhodesia and it is supposed for this reason that the speci- mens from these localities attributed to poweri (Leeson, 1931) may in fact have been amaltheus. In view of the fact that proof of the presence of the latter in \o Anzxs with more Tn&n 2.0* Ravn- FIG. 3. Distribution of Aedes pseudonigeria. Southern Rhodesia at present rests on only one female specimen this hypothesis is highly conjectural. Chapin's South-east Veld District contains at least two very distinct faunal areas, the high veld of the Transvaal and Southern Rhodesia and the humid coastal THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION 37 belt of Zululand, Natal and Pondoland. Both have characteristic species showing interesting affinities with the fauna of the East African Highlands. A large part of the area (Orange Free State, Basutoland and most of Eastern Cape Province) is still unknown as far as its Stegomyia fauna is concerned. Information concerning the extreme southern limits of such a species as contiguus would be very valuable in assessing the climatic limits of the sub-genus as a whole an important matter in any speculation regarding its past history. over *vooo' Lo.rvd under 3000' ftaln- Areas w more than <*<>' Aai.iv amaltKe-as. FIG. 4. Putative distribution of Aedes amaltheus. Aedes contiguus is the characteristic species of the High Veld and it is known from nowhere else, but Aedes langata, which appears to be closely related to it and which overlaps with it in Southern Rhodesia, was first described from the East African Highlands (Fig. 5). In so far as confirmed records are concerned both would appear to be highland species with altitudinal limits between 4,000 and 6,000 ft., but unconfirmed records suggest that langata at least may occur rather lower, and 3,500 ft. is perhaps nearer the limit for this species. There are also unconfirmed records of contiguus from lower altitudes in the Transvaal, and further information is needed before any very critical estimate can be made. It is, however, notable 38 THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION that in general the 3,500 ft. contour appears to approximate to the " boundary " between the East African Highland and East African Lowland faunas. Any attempt to calculate empirical rainfall limits is also rather hazardous, but it is a So FIG. 5. Putative distribution of Aedes langata and Aedes contiguus. Only the unshaded areas are within the rainfall and altitudinal limits so far recorded. striking fact that neither species has been found anywhere with less than 20 in. or more than 40 in. of rain (cp. amaltheus, above, and deboeri, Fig. 6). Applying these as putative limits together with the altitudinal limits deduced above an interesting discontinuous distribution is obtained embracing the Abyssinian and THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION 39 East African Highlands and the High Veld. This distribution seems a reasonable one in the light of negative records and of the known distribution of other species of mosquitoes, and suggests the interesting possibility that these species may have an upper rainfall limit, though why this should be so is not at all clear. The relation between the faunas of the Abyssinian and Kenya Highlands is a particularly interesting one, and it has therefore been thought desirable to include a map showing rainfall in relation to altitude in this region (Fig. 6). This map is based, wherever possible, on selected rainfall figures from the summaries published by the East African Meteorological Service. Few or no records are, however, at present available from the more northerly part of the area, and here use has been made of the isohyets provided by the Rainfall Map of East Africa (E.A.F. No. 1518). The gap between north-eastern Uganda and the area of suitable rainfall in southern Abyssinia seems probably to be purely an altitudinal one and, if based on the 3,ooo-ft. contour, would be somewhat less extensive than it appears in Fig. 6, where for convenience the 3,500 -ft contour, is used. Nevertheless it seems likely to be a more permanent one than the gap between the Guinean Savanna Province and the wetter parts of Abyssinia, which is purely a rainfall one (Fig. 14). Under exist- ing rainfall conditions it seems that the topotypical population of langata is isolated from areas of suitable rainfall and altitude in more northerly parts of Kenya, and the absence of records from further north than Nairobi is perhaps not entirely fortuit- ous. It seems likely that this species achieves its most extensive distribution in Tanganyika. Aedes poweri apparently requires a rainfall of at least 40 in. (38*3 in. in the case of the Kologha Forest, fide Muspratt, but all rainfall figures in the present paper, as in its predecessor, are expressed to the nearest 5 in.). It occurs, therefore, as far as is known, in the wetter parts of South Africa from Natal to the Eastern Cape Province, as do such species as demeilloni and strelitziae. It appears to require very well distributed rainfall (2 months with less than i in. in the case of the Kologha Forest and no months in the case of the Blaaukrans Forest (Groot Rivier)). Inten- sive collecting by Mr. Muspratt has failed to reveal it in the coastal lowlands of Natal or in certain upland forests, and it is still not known in what part of Natal the type specimen was taken. It seems reasonable to suppose, however, that in this part of its range it is a highland species, and that it may be regarded on the basis of distribution as well as of morphology as the third and southernmost link in the chain langata-continguus (cp. Figs. 5 and 8). It seems not at all unlikely that this species and contiguus may overlap in some parts of their range, as do contiguus and langata farther north. Aedes subargenteus, which occurs widely in the coastal parts of Zululand, Natal and Pondoland, is represented by a closely related species or subspecies (kivuensis) in the Kivu Highlands (Fig. 7). It also occurs in the lower parts of Chapin's East African Highland District at the southern end of Lake Nyasa and at Taveta. So far as is known the type form does not occur above about 3,000 ft. To judge from its distribution in South Africa it might be expected to require a rainfall of the order of 40 in. or more. Its occurrence at Taveta would not be inconsistent with this, since, as shown in the appendix to the previous paper (Mattingly, 1952), this 4 THE SUB, GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION place has a higher effective rainfall than the annual total of 26 in. would suggest. Without local information it is impossible to explain the Fort Johnston records in FIG. 6. Details of rainfall and altitude in the Abyssinian and East African Highlands. similar terms, but it seems possible that here too some unusual local factors may operate. Regarding kivuensis it seems probable that it is confined to some of the THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION 41 Mfumbiro vulcanoes and perhaps to parts of Ruanda-Urundi. It is interesting to note that Edwards and Gibbins failed to find it on Mgahinga or Sabinio. Somewhat resembling subargenteus, though perhaps more nearly allied to simpsoni Areas w UK JLO va.v Or FIG. 7. Distribution of Aedes subargenteus, kivuensis and woodi. and strelitziae, is Aedes woodi, which is known only from three very scattered localities in the South-eastern Veld, East African Lowland and East African High- land Districts respectively. It is curious that this species does not extend as far south as the coastal belt of Natal where other members of the group are so abundant, 42 THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION but so little is known about it that speculation on this point would be useless. Of the other species known from the South-eastern Veld District calceatus and soleatus are discussed below in connection with the East African Lowland District. Aedes strelitziae and Aedes demeilloni appear to be entirely confined to the area of Zululand, Natal and Cape Province, having the very equitably distributed rainfall which has been shown to be characteristic of dendrophilus (Mattingly, 1952). Aedes strelitziae .10 30 FIG. 8. Distribution of Aedes poweri, demeilloni and strelitziae. Unshaded areas agree approximately in rainfall and altitude with the area in which these species have been found. does not appear to have been found much above sea-level, but the record of demeil- loni from the Impetyeni Forest suggests that this species may occur at considerable altitudes. The record is too imprecise to give much idea of the altitudinal limits, but the presumptive limit of 5,000 ft. shown in Fig. 8 is probably an extreme one, and some of the areas shown as possibly suitable may well be in fact too high. Among the East African Highland species keniensis, langata and kivuensis have already been mentioned. So large a part of this district is still uncollected that nothing more can usefully be said about their distribution. The distribution of THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION 43 the deboeri group is of particular interest owing to the intergrading of deboeri itself with the so-called bambusae ssp. kenyae of the East African Montane District. It seems probable that the latter is in fact either a distinct species or else a subspecies of deboeri. The striking yellow markings which have led to its being associated with bambusae appear to be characteristic of species inhabiting the montane bamboo forests, and are shown equally by angustus, bambusae s. str. and ruwenzori. Under these circumstances a fuller knowledge of the distributional limits of deboeri and of its variation in relation to altitude is much to be desired. At present the only record from below 5,000 ft. which can be checked is that from Marangu, and the records from Mombo and Moshi therefore appear doubtful, but more material is badly needed from this part of Africa. The upper limit of deboeri, as far as is known, is about 6,500 ft. The lower limit of kenyae is apparently about 5,000 ft. on the western face of the Kenya highlands, but on the eastern face, where it might possibly overlap with deboeri, it is not known from below about 8,000 ft. (Fig. 9). In this connection it is interesting to note that at lower altitudes it is recorded as breeding mainly in tree-holes and shaded rock-holes unlike bambusae s. str., which is known only from bamboos. In this respect its habits are more in accordance with those of deboeri. It may also be noted that the two forms are separated by a rather well- marked rainfall factor, since kenyae, in so far as is known, is restricted to the wetter western part of Kenya, while deboeri is known only from the drier eastern part (cp. Figs. 6 and 9). The known rainfall limits of deboeri are 35 in. to 40 in. or 35 in. to 50 in. if the record from Marangu is included. The fact that, unlike keniensis, it has not been recorded from the area of rather higher rainfall around Mt. Kenya may suggest that its upper limit is about 40 in. and the Marangu form is a distinct species or sub-species but much more evidence is required on this point. However, the Rhodesian Highland affinities of keniensis and those of langata with the fauna of the South-eastern Veld do seem to be reflected in their respective distributions in Kenya, where the latter appears to have the same rainfall limits as deboeri. Mor- phologically deboeri shows some resemblance to heischi, and to demeilloni so that it might perhaps be regarded as the East African Highland representative of the East African Lowland fauna. On the other hand, as already indicated, it clearly has very close affinities with bambusae kenyae, and so might be regarded as a deriva- tive of the East African montane fauna. At the present time there is too little evidence to favour either hypothesis. Nor need they be mutually exclusive, and the view that deboeri has been derived from the heischi group and kenyae, in turn, from deboeri has much to commend it. Much more material is required, especially from Tanganyika, before any hypothesis can be given very much substance. Among the East African Montane forms other than kenyae, Aedes bambusae s. str. and Aedes angustus are, as far as is known, confined to the mountains of the Kivu, Mfumbiro and Kigezi regions, while Aedes ruwenzori is isolated further to the North on the Ruwenzori range. The single record from the Kibati lava plain suggests that kivuensis may be confined to certain of the Mfumbiro volcanoes or it may occur in Ruanda-Urundi. These are all highly interesting species, and it seems certain that others equally interesting await discovery on the many uncollected mountains of Africa. The importance of montane species for the understanding 44 THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION of the relationships of the Ethiopian fauna as a whole are such that any new evi- dence will be most welcome ; for the present all that can be done is to place the few available facts on record. Among East African Lowland species heischi is of particular interest owing to the diverse affinities suggested by its morphological characters, which recall deboeri, from the East African Highlands, the calceatus group from the East African Lowlands and demeilloni from the coastal part of the South-eastern Veld. In assessing its FIG. 9. Distribution of East African highland and montane species. rainfall requirements the record from Taveta requires to be approached with caution for reasons given above, and it would seem, in general, to require at least 40 in. In this respect it approximates most closely to demeilloni among the species men- tioned, and it certainly resembles this species most closely on larval characters. It seems therefore that it probably represents a South-eastern Veld element in the East African Lowland fauna. The same is true of woodi, although in this case the affinities are with simpsoni and strelitziae rather than with the demeilloni group. The other East African Lowland species, calceatus and soleatus, appear to require less rain, and both are known from localities with only 25 in. Both species have been recorded from the South-eastern Veld and East African Highland Districts, THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION 45 but it is in the East African Lowland District that they appear to attain their widest distribution. Records from the Chindamora Reserve and from Ndanga cannot at present be accepted, since no specimens are available from either locality. The record of calceatus from the Langata Forest almost certainly concerns a distinct species or subspecies, as explained above under " Taxonomy." Apart from these O Sol eat as A KeXsckt FIG. 10. Distribution of the calceatus group. the only records from above 3,500 ft. are those from Bindura (Edwards, 1941) and of soleatus from Mlanje. No specimens from Bindura have been seen, and the record from Mlanje is based on one female only. This specimen is in good condition and seems quite typical but its identity requires confirmation. In any case neither record need necessarily imply occurrence above 3,000 ft., since both localities are associated with abrupt changes of altitude. It would seem therefore that both species may be regarded as being limited largely, if not entirely, by the 3,500 ft. contour (Fig. 10) ; certainly everything at present known about the East African 46 THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION Highland and East African Lowland Stegomyia suggests that the two districts are best denned by an altitudinal boundary of this order. The very interesting records from Northern Zululand, sent by Mr. Muspratt while this paper was in the press and not therefore included in Fig. 10, probably represent the southern limits of the two species. In neither case do the rainfall limits appear to be at all clearly denned except that 25 in., perhaps, represents a minimum. There remain for discussion only the island species. Of these Aedes mascarensis and Aedes vinsoni are apparently restricted to Mauritius. The relative distributions of the two forms on the island cannot be discussed since the number of precise locality records is negligible. Their resemblance to pale forms of aegypti is, however, so striking and of so much interest that it has been thought desirable to show their distribution in relation to that of such of these forms as occur in the Ethiopian Region (Fig. n). The forms in question are referred to collectively by Edwards (1941) as " var. queenslandensis Theo.," but it is preferred to treat them here as var. queenslandensis Edwards nee Theobald, since there are many pale forms occur- ring in various parts of the world, and we have as yet no evidence as to their origin or genetical constitution. Under the circumstances it seems best that the name queenslandensis Theo. should be restricted to the North Australian form on which Theobald (1901) based his type description. Mathis (1934) has shown that the laboratory bionomics of a number of strains from different parts of the world are similar and there has been a small amount of other work on these lines, but there would seem to be a case for a more thorough investigation from a genetical stand- point. Few attempts to cross pale and dark forms appear to have been made, but Dr. Mara has informed me in conversation that they hybridise readily in Eritrea. The matter is of particular interest in the present connection because there are in the British Museum some aegypti from Mauritius which are quite markedly pale in colour. It seems possible that this may have some bearing on the curious statement by MacGregor (1927) regarding the distribution of aegypti on that island. According to MacGregor, " for some inexplicable reason it is restricted to the coastal belt, in which, moreover, it has locally a very circum- scribed distribution. In Rodriguez, however, the species is much commoner, and occurs all round the island up to a level of at least 800 feet." A purely coastal distribution of aegypti in Mauritius might conceivably be explained by the fact that the local form was derived mainly from introduced " queenslandensis," since the distribution of this form on the mainland is almost entirely coastal (Fig. n), the few exceptions being localities which are in close and constant communication with ports either by rail or waterway (e.g., Degema, Lokoja, and see Lewis, 1945). To explain this coastal distribution in terms of altitude or rainfall is not very easy. Although they seem normally to be restricted to localities at or near sea- level, pale forms are on record from at least four localities at considerable altitudes (Gebeit, Harrar, Mecca, Sinkat). These are, however, all in very hot parts of the range. It is possible that they may represent temporary introductions and here, even more than in most cases owing to the factor of human transportation, it is necessary to bear in mind the possibility of seasonal extensions of range. Certainly the temperature factor seems likeliest in the present case to limit distribution, and THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION 47 it is interesting to note that Jepson et al. (1947) have expressed the opinion that it is through the operation of this factor that Anopheles gambiae is largely excluded from areas above 1,000 ft. in Mauritius. It would seem that the temperature gradient on the island must be very steep. The rainfall picture is a com- plicated one. This is a form showing greater powers of resistance to drought than any other Stegomyia, not even excepting vittatus, and yet it is known not only from places with moderately high rainfall (the palest of all the specimens FIG. ii. Distribution of pale forms of Aedes aegypti and of Aedes mascarensis and vinsoni in the Ethiopian Region. Inset : Map of Mauritius. in the British Museum comes from Dar-es-Salaam), but even from those in which the rainfall figure approaches or exceeds the three-figure mark (Bonny, Degema, Old Calabar, Porte Victoria, Principe Island). Here the explanation seems almost certain to be casual introduction from drier areas, and it seems reasonable to assume that this is by nature a drought-adapted form from the Red Sea littoral which has been introduced into coastal localities, often with high rainfall, where it is capable of surviving without immediate reversion to the " typical " colour. If this explanation is correct than it would seem that we have to deal with a com- paratively well defined and stable genetical entity rather than with a number of local aberrations of independent origin. It is not within the province of the present paper to discuss the distribution of aegypti in non-Ethiopian Africa (for 4 8 THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION which see Kumm, 19316, Callot, 1938, and Senevet, 1939), but it may be noted that the reference to colouring made by Linnaeus (1762) in his type description suggests that this was based on a pale form. Such forms certainly occur in Egypt, and the British Museum has a series from Alexandria. Mr. Lewis states (in litt.) that pale forms occurring inland in semi-desert areas in the extreme north of the Sudan appear rather different from the coastal forms discussed above. On distri- O 10 *O 6O 8O tOO 1X0 I*O 160 a I6O 160 IfcO ti*O no EZ3 Pistrtku.tton.oJ area, of Gvop C FIG. 12. a. Distribution of certain Stegomyia spp. in relation to Reinig's Glacial Wooded Refuges, b. Distribution of Aedes granti and allied species in relation to that of Group C as a whole. (Since this figure was prepared Aedes vittatus has been found in Sardinia). butional grounds it would not be at all unreasonable to suppose that the Mediter- ranean and Red Sea populations are distinct. Details of the distribution of pale forms of aegypti in the Ethiopian Region are given in Appendix III. Returning to the position in Mauritius, it may be noted that if the conditions observed by MacGregor still prevail, then mascarensis and vinsoni may well be largely isolated from aegypti either by rainfall or by temperature barriers, since there are no records of either species, susceptible of confirmation, from below about 1,000 ft. A local survey of the relative distribution of the three forms would be of considerable interest. THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION 49 Concerning Aedes granti little can be said, since it is known only from a single locality. The mesonotal coloration recalls a moderately pale Aedes aegypti, although on structural characters it appears to be quite unrelated. The abdomen does not show any pale speckling. The distribution of this species in relation to that of its supposed nearest relatives has been discussed above under " Taxonomy." Its distribution in relation to that of Group C as a whole is shown in Fig. 12. The failure of Aedes albopictus ever to be taken on the mainland of Africa is one of the mysteries of African zoogeography. It is true that over most of its range this species is associated with very heavy rainfall, but in parts of India and in China north of the Yangtse it must encounter rainfalls at least as low as those of most of the East African coast (e.g., Delhi with 30 in. and 6 dry months) while in FIG. 13. Recorded distribution of Aedes albopictus. Mauritius it would seem to occur in coastal localities with less than 40 in. of rain. Under these circumstances it might reasonably be expected at least from Zanzibar, Pemba and Mafia Islands, which have more than 70 in. rain. In fact, however, it seems never to have become established further west than the Seychelles and Madagascar (Fig. 13). The only explanation which can be offered in terms of rainfall is that in the Seychelles and western Madagascar the period of heavy rain is from November to March, whereas in the islands mentioned it is from March to May. Such considerations do not, however, suffice to explain its absence from the wetter parts of the Mozambique coast. It would be interesting to know whether it occurs in the Comoro Islands, and MacGregor's statement that it does not appear to occur on Rodriguez seems to merit investigation. From rainfall considerations the most likely areas for further spread are clearly Zanzibar and its adjacent islands and the small area northwards from Tanga, which has the highest rainfall (about 55 in.) along the whole east coast. ENTOM. Ill, I. 4 5 o THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION SUMMARY The distribution of those species of Stegomyia found in the West African Sub- region has been discussed in a previous paper (Mattingly, 1952). The present paper deals with those species which have not so far been found in the West African Sub-region and are believed to be confined to the East and South African Sub- region. As in the first paper, zoogeography is discussed mainly in relation to rain- fall and altitude. It is hoped that it may be possible to discuss other factors, notably temperature and vegetation, in later papers, The present paper, although it deals with many more species, is shorter than its predecessor because less is known about the Stegomyia fauna of the East and South African Sub-region than about that of the West African Sub-region. This applies to all aspects of mosquito studies. Studies on taxonomy and relationships are hampered by the fact that males and early stages of a number of species are still unknown, and by the lack of representative series from more than a very few parts of the range. Very large areas in the sub-region have still not been visited by collectors, and certain of these, notably in Tanganyika and Nyasaland, are so situated geographically as to prevent a proper co-ordination of the knowledge so far gained. There appears to be an insufficient awareness on the part of collectors that the eggs of this group are readily obtained by scraping out dry tree-holes and can be easily hatched in the laboratory. They form, in fact, ideal collector's material, since they are almost entirely immune from damage during transport. No large-scale studies on ecology and ethology comparable to those made in Uganda and to a less extent in British West Africa have been carried out anywhere in the sub-region. The very much greater altitudinal diversity of the East and South African Sub-region appears to have led to more extensive speciation than in the West African Sub-region, and here the task of the taxonomist is rendered an especially difficult one, since there is at present insufficient evidence to show how far the variation due to altitudinal factors is at present discontinuous. All the known montane and island Stegomyia are at present confined to the East and South African Sub-region, which is therefore of major importance for the study of relationships and the reconstruction of the past history of the group. Certain facts bearing on the relationship between the Ethiopian Stegomyia fauna and that of the Palearctic Region are discussed, and it is shown that Group A, which is at the present time entirely Ethiopian (with the exception of Aedes aegypti), must at one time have extended into eastern Asia. This subject will be treated more fully in a later paper, in which an attempt will be made to relate the taxonomy of the Ethiopian Stegomyia to that of the sub-genus as a whole. The present paper includes a description of a new species from Mauritius even more closely resembling a pale form of A edes aegypti than does mascarensis. Reasons are given for transferring mascarensis from group B and placing it with the new species in Group A. At the same time an appendix has been added containing details of the distribution of pale forms of aegypti in the Ethiopian Region. Other appendices are devoted to further notes on species discussed in the first paper and THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION 51 to the rainfall of the very interesting region lying between Abyssinia and the Guinean Savanna Province, which was also discussed in that paper. Other points of interest are the occurrence in the Rhodesias of a recently dis- covered species (Aedes amaltheus) which is annectent between Groups A and C, the description, here published for the first time, of a larva from South West Africa believed to be that of Aedes pseudonigeria, the discovery of Aedes langata (hitherto known only from Kenya) in Southern Rhodesia, the discovery of Aedes subargenteus (previously known only from Zululand, Natal and Pondoland and, as a supposed subspecies, from the Kivu region) in the neighbourhood of Kilimanjaro, the dis- covery of a highland member of the calceatus group probably a new species or sub- species, near Nairobi, the discovery, on Kilimanjaro, of a curious yellow form of deboeri which may eventually throw some light on the interesting problem of the relationship of this species to " bambusae ssp. kenyae " and the discovery, for the first time outside the Lagos area, of Aedes pseudoafricanus at Banana near the mouth of the Congo. The male of Aedes woodi and the adults and larva of a new subspecies of Aedes dendrophilus are described for the first time. The very recent discovery of Aedes keniensis at Njombe in the Livingstone Mountains lends support to the opinion, already formed from its resemblance to masseyi, that it represents a Rhodesian element in the East African Highland fauna. An unassociated larva is described which is believed to be that of masseyi. Despite the relative paucity of records it seems reasonably clear that for the purposes of the present group the East African Highland, Rhodesian Highland and East African Lowland Districts may be closely defined by altitudinal boundaries of the order of 3,500 ft. The East African Montane District seems to be similarly definable by a boundary in the neighbourhood of 6,000 to 6,500 ft., but it is to be noted that these altitudinal boundaries appear frequently to be associated with significant rainfall limits. Short notes on taxonomy and bionomics in relation to distribution are included. Topographical details and references to literature are confined to those which were not included in the first paper. APPENDIX I FURTHER NOTES ON SPECIES OCCURRING IN THE WEST AFRICAN SUB-REGION Since the publication of the first paper in this series a number of further distribu- tion records have been obtained for species occurring in the West African Sub-region. These are listed below. The abbreviations used are as follows : B.M., British Museum (Natural History) ; K.I., Koninglijk Instituut voor den Tropen, Amster- dam ; Terv., Musee du Congo Beige, Tervuren. Aedes apicoargenteus FR. CAMEROONS. Oyom-Abang (near Yaounde), Evodoula (B.M.). FR. EQUA- TORIAL AFRICA. Brazzaville (Grjebine, 1950). BELGIAN CONGO. Kapanga, Matadi, Mwene-Ditu, Rutshuru (Terv.), Popokabaka (B.M.). UGANDA. Kasunganyanja, Namalu (Haddow, in litt.}, Ntotoro East, Tokwe (Lumsden, 1951), Ntaya Swamp 52 THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION (Smithburn & Haddow, 1951), Nyagak Forest (Lumsden & Buxton, 1951). KENYA. Kodera (Garnham & McMahon, 1947). Aedes fraseri FERNANDO Po. Boloko, Botonos, San Carlos, Santa Isabel (Gil Collado, 1936). UGANDA. Ntotoro East (Lumsden, 1951). Aedes dendrophilus BELGIAN CONGO. Kimilolo River (Terv.), Kisanga River (Mattingly & Lips, in press), Elisabethville (Muspratt, in litt.}. UGANDA. Ntotoro West (Lumsden, 1951). KENYA. Kwale (B.M.). N. RHODESIA. Serenje (B.M.). NATAL. Scott- burgh (B.M.). Aedes africanus DAHOMEY. Ouidah (Huttel, 1950). FR. CAMEROONS. Oyom-Abang (near Yaounde), Evodoula (B.M.). BELGIAN CONGO. Banzyville, Eala, Gombi-Masaka- Kibanzi, Kabila, Kabukulu, Kakulubu, Kambundi, Kianga, Kibulu, Kimilolo River, Kinkosi, Kisantu, Kitutu, La Kafubu, Leopoldville, Mangembo, Mubanga, Mulassu-Tugi, Mwela, Popokabaka, Tukisi, Zundu (Terv.), Kasapa River, Kiniama, Kisanga River (Keyberg), Lofoi River (Kundelungu Plateau), Luano (B.M.). RUANDA-URUNDI. Usumbura (Terv.). UGANDA. Kaabong, Kasunganyanja, Lab- wor (Haddow, in litt.}, Lunyo (Gillett et al., 1950), Ntotoro East, Ntotoro West, Tokwe (Lumsden, 1951), Ntaya Swamp (Smithburn & Haddow, 1951), Nyagak Forest (Lumsden & Buxton, 1951). ABYSSINIA. Jimma (Giaquinto-Mira, 1950). KENYA. Kodera (Garnham & McMahon, 1947), Cheborget, Mambwa (E.C.C. Van Someren, in litt.); TANGANYIKA. Ukara I. (B.M.). N. RHODESIA. Serenje (B.M.). Aedes pseudoafricanus BELGIAN CONGO. Banana (as africanus Wanson, 1935). Aedes simpsoni FERNANDO Po. Biapa, Musola, Rebola (Gil Collado, 1936). BELGIAN CONGO. Bili (De Meillon & Lavoipierre, 1944), Albertville, Inongo, Kazungeshi, Kibati, Kimilolo River, Komi, unnamed locality between Libenge and Lisala, Ngbandi, Thysville (Terv.), Kinanyira (Uvira area) (B.M.). RUANDA-URUNDI. Usumbura (Terv.). UGANDA. Kaabong, Kasunganyanja (Haddow, in litt.}, Ntotoro East, Ntotoro West, Tokwe (Lumsden, 1951), Koich-Kenya River Junction (Lumsden & Buxton, 1951), Bageza (near Mubende), Bugazi (on Kome Island), Bunono, Buwaya, Kitubulu, Seguku (all near Entebbe), Hakitengya (Gillett, I95i). ABYS- SINIA. Jimma (Giaquinto-Mira, 1950). TANGANYIKA. Mofu (Gander, 1951). NATAL. Port Shepstone, St. Winifred's (B.M.). CAPE PROVINCE. Port St. Johns (B.M.), East London, Mazeppa Bay (Muspratt, in litt.}. THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION 53 Aedes luteocephalus BELGIAN CONGO. Banana (Wanson, 1935), Elisabeth ville (Mattingly & Lips, in press). UGANDA. Namalu (Haddow, in litt.}, Mongiro (Lumsden, 1952). Aedes unilineatus ZULULAND. Ishongwe (Muspratt in litt.}. Aedes metallicus BELGIAN CONGO. Elisabeth ville (Mattingly & Lips, in press). KENYA. Kodera (Garnham & McMahon, 1947). ZULULAND. Ishongwe (Muspratt in litt.}. Aedes vittatus DAHOMEY. Abomey (Huttel, 1950). FR. EQUATORIAL AFRICA. Brazzaville (Grjebine, 1950). BELGIAN CONGO. Albertville, Banzyville, La Lufira, Lubum- bashi River, Ngbandi, Sesenge-gadin (Terv.). UGANDA. Kaabong, Kamion (Haddow, in litt.}, Ntotoro West (Lumsden, 1951). SUDAN. Between Suakin and Erkowit (as sugens, King, 1908). ARABIA. Jebel Jihaf (B.M.). ABYSSINIA. Moyale (La Face, 1939), Guder (Giaquinto-Mira, 1950). ERITREA. Barentu (Giaquinto-Mira, 1950). IT. SOMALILAND. Burhacaba (Zavattari in Tedeschi & Scalas, 1934). S. RHODESIA. Msonneddi (Edwards, 1940), Domboshawa (K.I.). Aedes aegypti CAPE PROVINCE. Additional southerly records kindly sent me by Mr. Muspratt are East London and Port Alfred. He notes that this species has not so far been found in Port Elizabeth or further westward. Dr. Mara has informed me in conversation that he cannot accept my suggestion that his record of aegypti from Mt. Bizen indicates a casual introduction. He tells me that it has since been found there repeatedly and appears to be well established. Records from outside the Ethiopian Region additional to those given in the first paper are as follows : Aedes unilineatus INDIA and PAKISTAN. Karachi (Hicks & Diwan Chand, 1936), Nilgiri Hills (Russell & Mohan, 1942), Kohat (Qutubuddin, in litt.}. Aedes vittatus BALEARIC Is. Raxa-Caubet (Mallorca) (Canamares, 1951). CORSICA. Bucalojo River Gorge, San Nicolao, West Coast near Ajaccio (Aitken, in litt.}. SARDINIA. Cantoniera Ovile Cannas, Picocca River Gorge, Villanovatulo (Aitken, in litt.}. INDIA. Hyderabad City (Deccan) (Qutubuddin, 1951), Nedumangad, Kalkulam (lyengar 1938). 54 THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION The discovery of specimens of dendrophilus in the Tervuren Museum, where they had been placed under Aedes fraseri, is of interest as this species has only very recently been recorded for the first time from the Katanga (Mattingly, 1952). The specimens, unlike that on which the previous record was based, are in good condition and seem typical, although males and early stages are still required for final confirmation. In the appendix to my first paper it was suggested that the occurrence of this species so far outside its known rainfall limits might be due to the presence of gallery forest, but Monsieur Lips informs me that this forest and others from which Aedes africanus is recorded above are of a special type known locally as Muhulu, which is denser and more humid than ordinary gallery forest and is associated mainly with the sources and head-waters of streams. There is no doubt that it is an important distinction, and the resemblance to the type of forest in which Aedes africanus was found at Taveta is striking (see appendix to first paper). Synecological observations of this kind are felt to be of great value, and it is considered that they may well have an important part to play in the further development of mosquito research. Mr. Muspratt's record from Elisabethville is based on a unique female in the S.A.I.M.R. collection. The records of dendro- philus and africanus from Serenje are each based on a unique female specimen. The rainfall here appears to have an even less equable seasonal distribution than at Elisabethville since there are, on an average, 7 months with less than i in. of rain. Serenje is, however, situated on a high plateau, and it seems possible that forest of the Muhulu type may occur there. The record of dendrophilus from Kwale is associated with one of the isolated areas shown in Fig. 9 of the previous paper as having a type of rainfall suited to this species. It may well represent a distinct subspecies. The taxonomic status of this and other isolated populations will be discussed in a later paper in the series. As noted in the previous paper, the record of africanus from Ukara Island was based on a single larva. It has now been possible to confirm it from a series of ten female adults. The record of unilineatus from Karachi is of special interest since it is associated with detailed rainfall data. It is based on a mosquito survey, which may be taken for practical purposes to have lasted from the beginning of May to the end of October, 1935. Rainfall during this period was as follows : May o-o, June o-o, July 1-04 in., August 0-30 in., September 0-15 in., October 0*02 in. During the period in question adults were found during August only. No larvae appear to have been found. The mean annual rainfall over the previous six years was 10-2 in., with a mini- mum of 0-69 in. in 1931 and a maximum of 20-82 in. in 1933. 7-17 in. fell in 1934. The number of months with less than i in. of rain was 12 in 1931, 8 in 1933 and 10 in 1934. The record of this species from the Nilgiri Hills is interesting as supporting the conclusion already drawn from Barraud's record from Bombay that this species may occur in India in association with higher rainfalls than any as yet recorded for it in Africa. Mr. D. J. Lewis has kindly told me that in his opinion the altitude given for Erkowit in the first paper is too high and that it is in fact of the order of 3,500 ft. Various altitudes appear in the literature. Hurst & Black give 3,600 ft. and the East and South African Handbook gives 3,800 ft. Certainly a figure of this order would be in better accordance with those recorded THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION 55 for this species from elsewhere than the figure of 4,300 ft. which I have quoted (see Mattingly, 1952, pp. 262 and 289). The records of vittatus from the Balearics and from Corsica and Sardinia are of great interest since they fully confirm the locality recorded for the type by Bigot, on which some doubt has been thrown. The record from Gilder is interesting because of the high altitude involved (cp. Mara's negative record from Mt. Bizen). " Chell's Third Camp " quoted in the first paper as an unidentified locality for this species can now be said probably to have been in the Marsabit area (see Edwards, 1941, p. 465). The record from Brazza- ville is interesting in view of the paucity of records from this part of Africa noted in the first paper. The record from Jebel Jihaf is associated with an altitude of circa 7,100 ft. This is in good accord with its distribution elsewhere, in contrast to Patton's negative record from behind Aden (see Mattingly, 1952, p. 291). The record of pseudoafricanus from Banana is the first from outside the Lagos area. It is based on a long series of specimens in the Congo Museum. This series contained 24 complete males, all of which were dissected and all of which proved to be pseudo- africanus. The scutal markings of these and of the accompanying females agree with those of specimens from the Lagos area and may be regarded as diagnostic (see Chwatt, 1949, and Mattingly, 1952). In the Congo Museum the specimens were placed under africanus, but it seems that this species probably does not occur at Banana, which has a rainfall of only 32^ in. with 4 dry months (Vandenplas, 1943). The new records of africanus do not add materially to our knowledge of its distribution except for that from Usumbura, which provides one of the rare cases of its occurrence in an area with less than 40 in. of rain (35 in. but with only 3 dry months according to Vandenplas, 1943), and that from Kaabong, which probably has a similar rainfall, although this is at present uncertain. It may be noted that experimental evidence is now available to show that the eggs of this species can withstand desiccation for at least 74 days (Gillett et al., 1950). The record from Kaabong is of particular interest in relation to the known occurrence of africanus in Abyssinia (see Mattingly, 1952). The record of apicoargenteus from Kapanga is from the locality of that name in the Katanga and not from the one in the Leopoldville area (per fide Basilewsky). It is of interest as representing the highest altitude from which apicoargenteus has been recorded in this part of its range (see Mattingly, 1952). The records of this species from Rutshuru and Usumbura are based on one and two female specimens respectively. Larvae from these localities would be very welcome for comparison with those of denderensis. The relatively low rainfall in combination with very equitable seasonal distribution at Usumbura has been noted in connection with Aedes africanus. Its significance would be easier to assess if more recent detailed figures were available. Gillett 's paper should be consulted for some further notes on the anomalies in the biting behaviour of Aedes simpsoni discussed in the first paper of the present series. (See also Bruce-Chwatt, 1950.) The record of this species from East London extends its known distribution considerably to the southward. The following are details of the localities listed above other than those already tabulated in the first paper. Certain localities in the Belgian Congo could not be placed with accuracy without making local inquiries, and as they affect only species 56 THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION having a very wide distribution in this part of Africa it has been considered sufficient to give a rough indication of their whereabouts. Gombi-Masaka-Kibanzi (Coll. Henrard) and Kinkosi and Tukisi (Coll. Fain) have not been traced. There are at least three places by the name of Bili in the Belgian Congo, and De Meillon gives no indication as to which is implied (Coll. Liegeois). <5o y.oSN. 2.04 E. (40) 2,500 5-568. 2Q.I3E. 50 <5 5-59S. 12.27 E. 30 [1,500) . 4-iyN. 21 . 12 E. (70) (2,000) i5.o8N. 37-35 E. (15) [ 1,000) (3-20N.) . (8. 45 E.) . . 2i.o6N. . 37.05 E. . <5 Gebeit, Sudan .... 2,500 . 18.57 N. 36.51 E - 5 Halaib, Sudan .... <5oo . 22.I2N. . 36.36E. . <5 Kameran I., Arabia . . . <5oo . 15.25]^. . 42.35 E. . (5) Massawa, Eritrea . . . <5oo . 15.37]^. 39-29 E - . 5 Mecca, Arabia .... 2,000 . 2I.25N. . 39.54 E. . (5) Mohammed Gul, Sudan . . <5oo . (20.45 N.) . (37.ooE.) . <5 Picard I., Aldabara . . . <5oo . (9.218.) . (46.05 E.) . ? (90) Port Louis, Mauritius . . . <5 . 20.188. . 57.31 E. . (35) Port Sudan, Sudan . . . <5 . 19.37 N. 37- I 3 E - 5 Principe I., G. of Guinea . . 0-3,000 .. 2.ooN. . 7-3oE. . 100 Sinkat, Sudan . . . . 3,000 . iS.soN. . 36.50 E. . 5 Suakin, Sudan . . -. . <5<>o . 19.07 N. . 37.20 E. . 5 Tarim, E. Aden Prot. . * 2,200 . 16.02 N. . 49.00 E. . (25) Tokar, Sudan . . . ' . <5 . 18.25 N. 37-45 E - 5 Zeila, Br. Somaliland . . . <5oo . n.2oN. . 43.28 E. . (5) THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION 61 APPENDIX IV CORRIGENDA TO PART I The receipt of further material of Aedes keniensis and the publication of a descrip- tion of the larva of Aedes ruwenzori (Gillett, 19516) and of the adult of Aedes vinsoni (supra) necessitate certain alterations to the keys published in the first paper of the series. Further alterations are also required to cover variation in soleatus as revealed by Mrs. Van Someren's studies of Kenya Lowland material, but it is not felt that information concerning variation in calceatus is as yet sufficient to warrant altering the keys. It should, however, be borne in mind that considerable difficulty may be experienced with atypical specimens of this species, and the possibility of confusion of an occasional aberrant specimen of soleatus with heischi should also be noted. Alterations to the keys can conveniently be made as follows : p. 246. First line of couplet 20. For " all round " read " above." For " ith " read " ^th." Couplet 23 should be rewritten as follows : 23. Anterolateral scutal patches pointed behind and reaching margin of scutum for some distance in front. First mid-tarsal often extensively pale behind. Scale patch on ppn very small soleatus Edwards. Anterolateral patches rounded. First mid-tarsal without posterior exten- sion of pale scaling (may be pale above for up to f ths). Scale patch on ppn extensive 24. p. 247. After couplet 36 insert : 37. All femora with well marked knee-spots. Mid femur largely pale in front vinsoni Mattingly. Femora without knee-spots. Mid-femur with pale scaling restricted to a narrow line on the under surface mascarensis MacGregor. p. 249. Second half of couplet 20. For " bambusae, dendrophilus , deboeri " read "24." After couplet 23 insert 24. Head seta A with 5-8 branches ruwenzori. This seta with at most 3 branches, usually less bambusae, deboeri, dendrophilus. Corrections to the list of localities on pp. 262-263, suggested to me by persons with local knowledge, are as follows : Altitude of Erkowit to read 3600 ft. Altitude of Fort Ternan to read 5800 ft. Latitude and longitude of Kayembe-Mukulu to read (9.01 S.) (23.59 E.). Altitude of this locality to read (3300). In the second line of the summary on p. 293 the words " No species " should read " Only one species." Mr. Muspratt informs me that De Meillon and Lavoipierre's record of simpsoni from Cape Province should be interpreted as from Hole-in-the-Wall rather than from Mkanduli. The last entry under this species on p. 253 should be amended accordingly. 62 THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION ACKNOWLEDGMENTS In addition to those persons and institutions already listed in the first paper of this series, many of whom have contributed also to the second, I am indebted to Monsieur P. Basilewsky and the Director of the Congo Museum for the many facilities afforded me there ; to Dr. J. Bonne- Wepster for showing me the collection of African Culicidae at the Indisch Instituut, Amsterdam ; to Dr. T. H. G. Aitken of the Rockefeller Foundation for allowing me to publish his very interesting records of Aedes vittatus ; to Dr. Giaquinto-Mira of the World Health Organization, Teheran, Persia, for topographical data from Abyssinia ; to Dr. De Barros Machado of the Museu do Dundo, Lunda, Angola for topographical data ; to Dr. Elizabeth Marks of the University of Queensland for the use of a manuscript copy of her thesis ; to Dr. W. Peters of the Colonial Development Corporation, Njombe, Tanganyika, who has sent me much material new to that territory ; to Dr. A. Soos of the Hun- garian National Museum for the loan of a specimen of Aedes cretinus ; to Dr. B. P. Uvarov of the Anti-Locust Research Centre, London, for allowing me to consult his manuscript while his paper was in the press ; to Monsieur Vinson of the Govern- ment Service, Mauritius for the very interesting new species of Stegomyia from that island ; to Mr. Qutubuddin of the Malaria Institute of Pakistan for the record of unilineatus from Kohat, to Dr. N. L. Corkill, A.D.M.S., Mukalla and Dr. L. Merucci of Tarim for Arabian aegypti, and to Dr. L. Mara of the World Health Organization for information regarding Eritrean aegypti. REFERENCES BARRAUD, P. J. 1931. Notes on some Indian mosquitoes of the subgenus Stegomyia, with descriptions of new species. Ind. J. med. Res. 19 : 221-227. BASCHKAREVA, A. D. 1931. Some facts on malaria and mosquitoes in the Sotschi district. Mag. Parasit., Moscow, 2 : 55-58. BICK, G. H. 1949. Notes on mosquitoes from Leyte, Philippine Islands (Diptera, Culicidae). Nat. Hist. Misc. Chicago, No. 41. BONNE-WEPSTER, J., & BRUG, S. L. 1932. The subgenus Stegomyia in Netherland India. Geneesk. Tijdschr. Ned.-Ind., Bijbl. ii : 39-119. BRUCE-CHWATT, L. J. 1950. Recent studies on insect vectors of yellow fever and malaria in British West Africa. /. trop. Med. Hyg. 53 : 71-79. CALLOT, J. 1938. Contribution a l'6tude des moustiques de Tunisie et en particulier du Sud de la R6gence. Arch. Inst. Pasteur, Tunis, 27 : 133-183. CANAMARES, F. T. 1951. La presencia del " Aedes (Stegomyia) vittatus Big." en al Medi- terr&neo y algunes observaiciones sobre el mismo. Rev. Sanid. Hig. publ., Madrid, 25 : 435-443- CARADJA, A. 1934. Herkunft und Evolution der palearktischen Lepidopterenfauna. Int. ent. Z. 28 : 217-224. CHOW, C. Y. 1949. Culicine mosquitoes collected in Western Yunnan, China during 1940-42. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 51 : 127-132. 1950. Collection of Culicine mosquitoes (Diptera, Culicidae) in Taiwan (Formosa), China, with description of a new species. Q. J. Taiwan Mus. 3 : 281-287. DE BEAUFORT, L. F. 1951. Zoogeography of the Land and Inland Waters. London. DE GRANDPRE, A. D., & DE CHARMOY, o'E. 1900. Les moustiques. Port Louis. DRAKE-BROCKMAN, R. E. 1911. Stegomyia fasciata in North-east Africa. Bull. ent. Res. 2 : 179. THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION 63 EDWARDS, F. W. 1920. Notes on the mosquitoes of Madagascar, Mauritius and Reunion. Ibid. 11 : 133-138- 1922. Mosquito notes : III. Ibid. 13 : 75-102. 1923 bis. Four new African mosquitoes. Ibid. 13 : 397-399. 19240. Some mosquitoes from Ovamboland, S.W. Africa and from the Cape Province. Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 19 : 159-163. 19246. Description of two new species of mosquitoes from coconut palms in East Africa. Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 18 : 187. 1925. Mosquito Notes : V. Bull. ent. Res. 15 : 257-270. 1935- Mosquito Notes : XII. Ibid. 26 : 27-136. 1940. A new plain-winged Anopheles from Rhodesia. Ann. trop. med. Parasit. 34 : 93-96. ENDERLEIN, G. 1921. Die Culiciden fauna Madagascars. Wien. ent. Ztg. 38 : 47-52. FENG, L. C. 1935. Notes on some mosquitoes collected from Shantung Province, North China. Chinese med. J. 49 : 359-365. i 9380. A critical review of literature regarding the records of mosquitoes in China : Pt. II. Peking nat. Hist. Bull. 12 : 285-318. 19386. The tree hole species of mosquitoes of Peiping, China. Chinese med. J., Suppl. II : 503-525- FORBES, H. O. (Ed.) 1903. The Natural History of Sokotra and Abd-el-Kuri. Liverpool. FURON, R. 1943. Manuel de Prehistoire Generale. Paris. GANDER, L. 1951. Experimentelle und Oekologische Untersuchungenuber das Schlupfvermogen der Larven von Aedes aegypti L. (Thesis for the Ph.D. degree, University of Basel.) GARNHAM, P. C. C. 1949. Acrodendrophilic mosquitoes of the Langata Forest, Kenya. Bull. ent. Res. 39 : 489-490. and McMAHON, J. P. 1947. The eradication of Simulium neavei, Roubaud, from an Onchocerciasis area in Kenya Colony. Bull. ent. Res. 37 : 619-628. GiAQuiNTO-MiRA, M. 1950. Notes on the geographic distribution and biology of " Anophe- linae " and " Culicinae " in Etiopia. Riv. Malarial. 29 : 281-313. GILLETT, J. D. I95ia. The habits of the mosquito Aedes (Stegomyia) simpsoni Theobald in relation to the epidemiology of yellow fever in Uganda. Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 45 : IIO-I2I. 19516. The larva, pupa and adult male of Aedes (Stegomyia) ruwenzori Haddow and van Someren (Diptera, Culicidae). Ibid. 45 : 195-198. GRJEBINE, A. 1950. Moustiques du Moyen-Congo. Bull. Inst. Etud. centrafr., N.S. 1 : 25-48. HARPER, J. O. 1947. A mosquito survey of Mahe, Seychelles. E. Afr. med. J. 24 : 25-29. HICKS, E. P., & DIWAN CHAND. 1936. A mosquito survey of Karachi airport. Rec. malar. surv. India, 6 : 515-535. Ho, Cn'I. 1931. Study of the adult Culicids of Peiping. Bull. Fan Inst. Biol. Peking 2 : 107-175. HOPKINS, G. H. E. 1952. Mosquitoes of the Ethiopian Region. I. Larval Bionomics of Mosquitoes and Taxonomy of Culicine Larvae. 2nd ed. London : Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.). HUTTEL, V. 1950. Note sur la repartition des moustiques dans le Bas-Dahomey. Bull. Soc. Path. exot. 43 : 563-566. IYENGAR, M. O. T. 1938. Studies on the epidemiology of Filariasis in Travancore. Indian med. Res. Mem. No. 30. JEPSON, W. F., MOUTIA, A., & COURTOIS, C. 1947. The malaria problem in Mauritius ; the bionomics of Mauritian anophelines. Bull. ent. Res. 38 : 177-208. KING, H. H. (1908) Report on economic entomology. Rep. Wellcome trop. Res. Lab. 3 : 201-248. KNIGHT, K. L., & HURLBUT, H. S. 1949. The mosquitoes of Ponape Island, eastern Carolines. /. Wash. A cad. Sci. 39 : 20-34. 64 THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION KNIGHT, K. L., and ROZEBOOM, L. E. 1946. The Aedes (Stegomyia) albolineatus group (Diptera, Culicidae). Proc. biol. Soc. Wash. 59 : 83-96. LAMBORN, W. A. 1922. The mosquitoes of some ports of China and Japan. Bull. ent. Res. 12 : 401-409. 1939. The medical entomologist's report. Annu. med. Rep. Nyasald. (1938). LEGENDRE, J. 1918. Note sur les Stegomyia de Tamatave. C. R. Soc. Biol. Paris, 81 : 832-833- LESTER, A. R. 1927. The coconut palm : its potentialities in providing breeding- places for mosquitoes. /. trap. Med. Hyg.' 30 : 136-145. LINNAEUS, C. 1762. D. F. Hasselquists . . . Reise nach Palestina. Rostock. LUMSDEN, W. H. R. 1951. Probable insect vectors of yellow fever virus, from monkey to man, in Bwamba County, Uganda. Bull. ent. Res. 42 : 317-330. 1952. The crepuscular biting activity of insects in the forest canopy in Bwamba, Uganda. A study in relation to the sylvan epidemiology of yellow fever. Ibid. 42 : 721-760. & BUXTON, A. P. 1951. A study of the epidemiology of yellow fever in the West Nile district, Uganda. Trans. R. Soc. trap. Med. Hyg. 45 : 53-78. MACGREGOR, M. E. 1924. Aedes (Stegomyia) mascarensis, a new mosquito from Mauritius. Bull. ent. Res. 14 : 409. McHARDY, J. W. 1932. Annu. med. (sanit.} Rep. Tanganyika (1928) : 45. MARKS, E. L. 1951. A Study of Variation in the Mosquito Aedes (Stegomyia) pseudoscutellaris (Theobald). (Thesis submitted for the degree of Ph.D. at Cambridge University.) MARTINI, E. 1931. Culicidae. (Lindner: Die Fliegen d. palearkt. Reg. 11-12.) Stuttgart. MATHIS, M. 1934- Biologic comparee, en conditions experimentales, de quatre souches du moustique de la fievre jaune. C. R. Soc. biol. 117 : 878-880. MATTINGLY, P. F. 1952. The sub-genus Stegomyia (Diptera, Culicidae) in the Ethiopian Region. I : A preliminary study of the distribution of species occurring in the West African Sub-region with notes on taxonomy and bionomics. Bull. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) Ent. 2 : 235-304. and LIPS, M. Notes on the Culicini (Diptera, Culicidae) of the Katanga. Rev. Zool. Bot. afr.. (In Press.) PEREIRA, M. DE C. 1946. Culicideos da Provincia do Sul do Save (Africa Orientale Portu- guesa). Ann. Inst. Med. trop., Lisbon, 3 : 341-364. QUTUBUDDIN, M. 1951. The Culicine mosquitoes of Hyderabad-Deccan City and their bionomics as observed during 1943-45. Pakistan J. Hlth. 1 (2) : 26-32. REINIG, W. F. 1937. Die Holarktis. Jena. RUSSELL, P. F., & MOHAN, B. N. 1942. Some mosquito hosts to avian plasmodia, with special reference to Plasmodium gallinaceum. J. Parasit. 28 : 127-129. SASA, M., and KANO, R. 1951. Description and comparative studies on the larva of Aedes (Stegomyia} galloisi Yamada (Diptera, Culicidae). Jap. J. exp. Med. 21 : 109-113. SENEVET, G. 1939. Aedes aegypti en Algerie. Arch. Inst. Pasteur Alger. 17 : 598-600. SENIOR-WHITE, R. 1920. A survey of the Culicidae of a rubber estate. Indian J. med. Res. 8 : 304-325. 1934- Three years' mosquito control work in Calcutta. Bull. ent. Res. 25 : 551-596. SIMPSON, J. J. 1913. In Current Notes. Bull. ent. Res. 2 : 179. SMITHBURN, K. C., & HADDOW, A. J. 1951. Ntaya virus : a hitherto unknown agent isolated from mosquitoes collected in Uganda. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol., N.Y. 77 : 130-133. SUMMERS-CONNAL, S. L. M. 1926. On the numerous variations occurring in the specimens of Aedes argenteus Poiret obtained in Lagos, Nigeria. Annu. med. sanit. Rep. Nigeria : 132-139. 1927. On the variations occurring in Aedes argenteus in Lagos, Nigeria. Bull. ent. Res. 18 : 5-11. TEDESCHI, C., and SCALAS, A. 1934. Contribute alia biogeografia della malaria in Burhacaba (Benadir). Riv. Malariol. 13 : 104-113. THE SUB-GENUS STEGOMYIA IN THE ETHIOPIAN REGION 65 THEOBALD, F. V. 1905 bis. A catalogue of the Culicidae in the Hungarian National Museum. Ann. Hist.-nat. Mus. hung. 3 : 61-119. - 191 ic. The distribution of the yellow fever mosquito (Stegomyia fasciata Fabricius) and general notes on its bionomics. Trans, ist internal. Congr. Ent. Pt. 2 : 145-170. 1912 bis. Percy Sladen Trust expedition to the Indian Ocean . . . Culicidae. Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond. Zool. 15 : 8-94. UVAROV, B. P. Some effects of past climatic changes on the distribution of African Acridiidae. Trans. IXth internal. Congr. Ent. (In Press.) VAN SOMEREN, E. C. C. 1946 bis. Ethiopian Culicidae : descriptions of the adults and pupae of two new species and two sub-species of the genus Aedes from East Africa (Dip- tera). Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (B) 15 : i 6. 1947- Ethiopian Culicidae Notes and descriptions. Ibid. 16 : 129-132. 1951. New Culicini from Kenya and Uganda. Ibid. 20 : 1-9. VAN SOMEREN, V. G. L., & DE BOER, H. S. 1926. Report on the mosquito breeding areas of Nairobi. Kenya med. J. 2 : 275-298. VENTRILLON, E. 1904. Description des Culicides de Madagascar. Bull. Mus. Hist, nal., Paris, 10 : 550-555. WANSON, M. 1935. Note sur les trous de crabes, gites larvaires. Ann. Soc. belg. Med. Irop. 15: 575-585. YAMADA, S. 1921. Description of ten new species of Aedes found in Japan, with notes on the relation between some of these mosquitoes and the larva of Filaria bancrofti Cobbold. Annot. zool.jap. 10 : 45-81. PRESENTED 2 4 JUN 1953 ENTOM. Ill, I. PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN BY ADLARD AND SON, LIMITED, BARTHOLOMEW PRESS, DORKING. ' '^ A PEST OF COCONUT PALMS IN PORTUGUESE EAST AFRICA TWO NEW REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GENUS HYPOTRABALA (LEPIDOPTERA: LASIOCAMPIDAE) FROM THE BELGIAN CONGO W. H. T. TAMS BULLETIN OF THE BRITISH MUSEUM (NATURAL HISTORY) ENTOMOLOGY Vol. 3 No. 2 LONDON: 1953 A PEST OF COCONUT PALMS IN PORTUGUESE EAST AFRICA TWO NEW REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GENUS HYPOTRABALA (LEPIDOPTERA : LASIOCAMPIDAE) FROM THE BELGIAN CONGO BY W. H. T. TAMS I Pp. 67-75; Pis. 1-2; Text-figures 1-14, 9-16 BULLETIN OF THE BRITISH MUSEUM (NATURAL HISTORY) ENTOMOLOGY Vol. 3 No. 2 LONDON: 1953 THE BULLETIN OF THE BRITISH MUSEUM (NATURAL HISTORY), instituted in 1949, is issued in Jive series corresponding to the Departments of the Museum, and an Historical Series. Parts appear at irregular intervals as they become ready. Volumes will contain about three or four hundred pages, and will not necessarily be completed within one calendar year. This paper in Vol. 3, No. 2 of the Entomological series. PRINTED BY ORDER OF THE TRUSTEES OF THE BRITISH MUSEUM Issued October, 1953 Price Four Shillings A PEST OF COCONUT PALMS IN PORTUGUESE EAST AFRICA By W. H. T. TAMS IN the spring of 1952 Mr. V. Sleptzow, one of the London representatives of the Sociedade Agricola do Madal, Quelimane, Africa Oriental Portuguesa, brought me a photograph of larvae, cocoons and moths of a destructive pest that was attacking coconut palms on a plantation at Micaune, Mosambique. At that time I could do no more than state that the insect involved was a moth belonging to the family Limacodidae, and I asked Mr. Sleptzow if he could procure specimens from the plantation. A consignment was sent by air from Quelimane on gth June, 1952, but there were no moths, and the small bottles containing larvae had become loose and were smashed, completely ruining the whole consignment, which arrived in a state of putrefaction. The larvae and cocoons were quite un- known to me, and I asked Mr. Sleptzow if he would be good enough to try again. He at once communicated with the African management of the company, with the result that in the middle of September I received by air mail another consignment of larvae and cocoons, and two battered crippled female moths, which had emerged on the journey. I carefully nursed the cocoons at home, and succeeded in rearing a number of moths of both sexes. After a close study of the species I found that not only was it unknown to me, but I could not find any close relative with which I could associate it generically. Accordingly, I sent several examples to Dr. E. Martin Hering of the Berlin Museum. Dr. Hering, who is the recognized authority on the family Limacodidae, informed me that he fully agreed with me that the species did not belong to any known genus, but appeared to be related to the genera in which the hind tibia bears two spurs only, and the tarsi are clothed with scales rather than with the more delicate hair- scales. It may be related to the Zinara group, and has some features suggestive of Sporetolepis Karsch, which, however, has at the end of the fore wing cell the fork of the parting-vein deep and closed distally by a cross-vein, whereas in the genus here described the fork is shallow and open. TROGOCRADA gen. n. Typus generis Trogocrada deleter sp. n. Antenna in $ pectinate, the pectinations decreasing slightly in length distad. Antenna in $ simple. Palpus stout, upcurved before frons, 3rd segment small, almost spherical, inconspicuous. Hind tibia with only one pair of spurs ; mid tibia with a bushy covering of long scales, all tarsi covered with scales (not fine hair-scales) (fig. 3, a, b, c, d). Fore wing with veins Sc, Ri and R2 separate and ENTOM. Ill, 2. 6 7 o COCONUT PALMS IN PORTUGUESE EAST AFRICA almost straight ; veins R3 + R4 + R5 stalked, medials separate, M2 nearer to M3 than to Mi ; parting-vein within the cell terminating in an open shallow fork. Hind wing with vein Sc anastomosing with middle of anterior margin of cell ; vein Rs stalked with vein Mi for proximal fourth ; lower angle of cell not appreciably nearer termen than upper angle. (Figs. 4, 5.) FIGS. 1-3. Trogocrada deleter sp. n. Fig. i, male ; fig. 2, female ; fig. 3, legs (a) fore, (b) mid, (c) hind, to show vestiture, (d) hind, to show tibial spurs. Trogocrada deleter sp. n. (Figs, i, <$, 2 ?.) c. Antenna warm buff, degraded with fuscous. Palpus mainly warm blackish brown, warm buff apically. Frons warm blackish brown, vertex apricot buff. Thorax warm to apricot buff, sometimes degraded with fuscous. Abdomen fuscous, lighter near base. Pectus and legs light to apricot buff, shaded with warm blackish brown in front. Venter fuscous, lighter medially. Fore wing apricot buff, proximal three-fourths heavily over-shaded with fuscous to warm blackish brown, with a wavy appearance between the velvety blackish-brown lunules medially and a strong, velvety, blackish-brown curved postmedial fascia (cf. fig. i), the distal portion of the wing suffused with tawny. Hind wing fuscous to fuscous black. Underside of both fore and hind wings fuscous to fuscous black. Expanse : 22-24 mm. COCONUT PALMS IN PORTUGUESE EAST AFRICA 71 $. Similar in pattern to $ ; the predominating colour may be apricot buff with tawny to fuscous shading beyond the postmedial fascia on the fore wing, the medial markings and postmedial fascia velvety blackish brown, or the whole wing may be suffused with fuscous. Underside may be apricot buff or fuscous. Expanse : 26-27 mm. st. FIGS. 4, 5. Trogocrada deleter sp. n. Fig. 4, fore-wing venation ; fig. 5, hind-wing venation. < genitalia. The male genitalia exhibit a robust structure of segments IX-X, the division between the terga being difficult to discern. The various structures are better displayed by figures than by descriptions. The valva is most unusual in shape and possesses distally a sort of loose " corona " of woolly hair-scales, and two fairly stout whip-like setae (figs. 8-13). $ genitalia. A very lightly sclerotised ostium bursae ; ovipositor lobes broad and prominent. 72 COCONUT PALMS IN PORTUGUESE EAST AFRICA Larva (fig. 6). The larva is green with velvety darker green shading and a variable line down the middle of the dorsum, frequently white edged with reddish, or entirely reddish. In shape it is quite unlike any Limacodid larva known to me. Cocoon (fig. 7). The larva makes an almost spherical cocoon (9 mm. X 8 mm.), whitish with irregular blackish markings. FIGS. 6, 7. Trogocrada deleter sp. n. Fig. 6, larva ; fig. 7, cocoon. Holotype <$, allotype $ and 8 paratypes: Portuguese East Africa, Micaune, destroying coconut plantations. Presented by the Sociedade Agricola do Madal, through Messrs. E. Isen (Quelimane), M. Terestchenko and V. Sleptzow, to whom I am grateful for the opportunity to study such an interesting moth. COCONUT PALMS IN PORTUGUESE EAST AFRICA 73 14 FIGS. 8-14. Trogocrada deleter sp. n., \ / PLATE 3 Uppersides (left) and undersides (right) of the following : (i) Teriomima subpunctata Kirby, neallotype <$. (2) Teriomima puella Kirby, neallotype ?. (3) Teriomima pdrva Hawker Smith, neallotype ?. (4) Baliochila barnesi gen. et sp. nov., holotype <$. (5) Baliochila barnesi allo- type $. (6) Baliochila neavei sp. nov., holotype (J. (7) Baliochila neavei allotype ?. (8) Baliochila dubiosa sp. nov., holotype c?. (9) Baliochila dubiosa, allotype $. (10) Baliochila nyasae sp. nov., holotype <$. Bull. B. M. (N.H.) Entom. Ill, 3 PLATE 4 21 PLATE 4 (n) Baliochila nyasae, allotype $. (12) Baliochila stygia Talbot, neallotype ?. (13) Balio- chila fragilis sp. nov., holotype <$. (14) Baliochila fragilis, allotype $. (15) Baliochila minima minima Hawker Smith, neallotype ?. (16) Baliochila minima latimarginata Hawker Smith, neallotype ?. (17) Baliochila minima amanica ssp. nov., holotype <$. (18) Baliochila minima amanica, allotype $. (19) Baliochila lipara sp. nov., holotype <$. (20) Baliochila lipara, allotype ?. (21) Baliochila singularis sp. nov., holotype ^. Bull. B. M. (N.H.} Entom. Ill, 3 PLATE 5 29 PLATE 5 (22) Baliochila singularis, allotype $. (23) Cnodontes (gen. nov.) pallida Trirnen, neallotype ?. (24) Cnodontes vansomereni sp. nov., holotype c?. (25) Cnodontes vansomereni allotype $. (26) Teriomima subpunctata Kirby, <$ genitalia (aedoeagus detached). (27) Teriomima puella Kirby, $ genitalia (aedoeagus detached). (28) Teriomima zuluana van Son, <$ genitalia (aedoe- agus detached). (29) Teriomima puellaris Trinien, $ genitalia (uncus and aedoeagus detached). Bull. 13. M. (N.H.) Entom. HI, 3 PLATE 6 PLATE 6 (30) Teriomima micra Grose Smith, <$ genitalia (aedoeagus detached). (31) Teriomima parva Hawker Smith, . 103-176 ; 41 Text-figures BULLETIN OF THE BRITISH MUSEUM (NATURAL HISTORY) ENTOMOLOGY Vol. 3 No. 4 LONDON: 1953 THE BULLETIN OF THE BRITISH MUSEUM (NATURAL HISTORY), instituted in 1949, is issued in Jive series corresponding to the Departments of the Museum, and an Historical Series. Parts appear at irregular intervals as they become ready. Volumes will contain about three or four hundred pages, and will not necessarily be compiled within one calendar year. This paper is Vol. 3, No. 4 of the Entomological series. PRINTED BY ORDER OF THE TRUSTEES OF THE BRITISH MUSEUM Issued December, 1953. Price Fifteen Shillings. NOTES ON BRITISH ICHNEUMONINAE WITH DESCRIPTIONS OF NEW SPECIES (HYM., ICHNEUMONIDAE) By J. F. PERKINS CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........... 105 I. NOTES ON THE LlNNEAN TYPES OF ICHNEUMONINAE . . . IO6 II. THE STEPHENS TYPES OF ICHNEUMONINAE .... 107 III. THE DESVIGNES TYPES OF ICHNEUMONINAE . . . .113 IV. TYPES OF BRITISH ICHNEUMONINAE IN THE BRIDGMAN, MARSHALL AND MORLEY COLLECTIONS . . . . . . .115 (fl) The Bridgman types of Ichneumoninae . . . . .116 (6) The Morley types of British Ichneumoninae . . . . 116 (c) The Marshall type of Mesostenus maurus . . . . .117 V. THE L. A. CARR COLLECTION OF ICHNEUMONIDAE . . . 117 The types of Ichneumoninae in the L. A. Carr collection . . 118 VI. SPECIES TO BE DELETED FROM THE LIST OF BRITISH ICHNEUMONINAE 118 VII. SPECIES RECORDED IN THE ADDENDA OF MORLEY'S British Ichneu- mons ........... 135 VIII. CHANGES IN THE TRIVIAL NAMES OF BRITISH ICHNEUMONINAE . 135 IX. CHANGES IN GENERIC PLACEMENT OF SPECIES OF BRITISH ICHNEU- MONINAE .......... 136 X. ADDITIONS TO THE LIST OF BRITISH ICHNEUMONINAE. . . 137 XI. DESCRIPTIONS OF NEW SPECIES OF BRITISH ICHNEUMONINAE . 145 XII. CHECK LIST OF BRITISH ICHNEUMONINAE ..... 169 XIII. REFERENCES .......... 175 SYNOPSIS The paper deals with the British species of Ichneumoninae to be added to, and deleted from the list given by Kloet and Hincks in their Check List of British Insects. Two genera and sixteen species are described as new and three new names are proposed. In all, no trivial names are deleted from the list and 105 are added ; this includes changes due to direct synonymy. Some new synonymy is included. Finally a new check list of British Ichneumoninae is given. INTRODUCTION THE present paper was written in order to clear the way for a handbook on the British species of Ichneumoninae. I have therefore given almost no notes on the characters for distinguishing the species which are added to the British list of Ich- ENTOM. Ill, 4. 9 106 NOTES ON BRITISH ICHNEUMONIN AE neumoninae as given in Kloet and Hincks (1945), as these will appear in the keys in the handbook. I have, however, given some information on certain of the species that I consider should be excluded from the British list, where these have a wider interest. I have been much aided in this work by the very kind co-operation of many workers who have sent me material and given me information. I wish to thank the Director of the Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique for allowing me the opportunity of examining the Wesmael collection, and Mons. A. Collart for the facilities he placed at my disposal ; the officials of the Linnean Society for allowing me to examine certain Linnean types ; Mr. E. A. Ellis of the Castle Museum, Norwich, for the loan of the Bridgman collection of Ichneumoninae ; the officers of the Suffolk Naturalists who presented the Morley types of Ichneumonidae to the British Museum and who have lent me the Morley collection of Ichneumonidae ; Mr. A. A. Gumming of the City Museum and Art Gallery, Plymouth, for allowing me to examine and borrow material from the Bignell collection ; Mr. H. C. S. Halton of the Natural History Museum, Wollaton Hall, Nottingham, for facilities to examine, and to borrow, types and material from the L. A. Carr collection of Ichneumonidae ; Miss G. Roche of the National Museum of Ireland for the loan of specimens from the Johnson collection ; Prof. C. H. Lindroth of the Lund University Museum for the loan of specimens from the Thomson collection ; Mr. A. W. Stelfox for the loan of his collection of Phaeogenini ; Dr. O. W. Richards for the loan of his collection of Ichneumoninae ; Dr. W. D. Hincks for the loan of material of Platylabini ; and Mr. G. J. Kerrich and Mr. G. Heinrich for information on various points, including types. Throughout the paper names which are given after an equals sign are the valid names, while those given after syn. are synonyms. References to original descriptions are not quoted in the text, but they can be found by consulting Dalla Torre (1902), Morley (1903) and Schmiedeknecht (1902 and 1928-1932) ; references to species described after 1932 will be found in section XIII at the end of the paper. I. NOTES ON THE LINNEAN TYPES OF ICHNEUMONINAE Roman (1932) has discussed the Linnean types of Ichneumonidae, but more recent work has made it necessary to re-assess certain of them, and the results are given below, in so far as they affect the British list of Ichneumoninae. Ichneumon fossorius L., 1758 = Amblyteles fossorius (L., 1758). syn. Amblyteles viridatorius (Gravenhorst, 1820). (syn. nov.) Roman has synonymized fossorius with Amblyteles subsericans (Gravenhorst). The type of fossorius is a male, and this can be distinguished at once from subsericans by the ventral fold on the sternites. The Linnean specimen has a fold on sternites 2-4. I have seen no specimen of Amblyteles fossorius (L.) from the British Isles. NOTES ON BRITISH ICHNEUMONIN AE 107 Ichneumon molitorius L., 1761. Roman suggested that the Linnean species belonged to the form described as crassifemur by Thomson. However, I regard crassifemur as being a species distinct from molitorius L. Thomson, distinguished not only in the characters of the hind leg given by Thomson, but also in having the groove on the underside of the middle femur with only very sparse hairs. The Linnean specimen agrees with Thomson's interpretation of molitorius. I have examined type material of crassifemur from the Thomson collection. Ichneumon comitator L., 1758. = Coelichneumon comitator (L., 1758). syn. Ichneumon restaurator F. Wesmael, 1844. Ichneumon lineator F. Gravenhorst, 1820, nee F., 1781. Ichneumon ferreus Gravenhorst, 1829. I regard Ichneumon ferreus as the form of C. comitator with the femora and tibiae red, but distinct from Coelichneumon purpurissatus (see p. 138). II. THE STEPHENS TYPES OF ICHNEUMONINAE I have re-examined the types of Stephens that had already been selected by Claude Morley (see Morley, 1902), and also I have been able to recognize further types which previously had remained unknown. I am therefore giving a complete list of the species of this sub-family described by Stephens in 1835 in his Illustrations of British Entomology : or a synopsis of Indigenous Insects : Mandibulata, 7 : 126- 207 and 269-273. The following changes of nomenclature are necessary : Coelichneumon nigerrimus (Stephens, 1835) for Coelichneumon derasus (Wesmael, 1844). Cratichneumon albifrons (Stephens, 1835) for Cratichneumon gravenhorstii (Boyer de Fonscolombe, 1847). Cratichneumon fabricator maculifrons (Stephens, 1835) for this British sub-species. Coelichneumon eximius (Stephens, 1835) for Coelichneumon coeruleus (Cres- son, 1864). The notes on the types of Ichneumon and Trogus are given in the order in which the species are placed in Stephens' work. Ichneumon fasciatus Type Hym. 3b 1580 <$ selected by Morley. = Hepiopelmus leucostigmus (Gravenhorst, 1820). The same specimen is the type of Ichneumon maculiventris Desvignes. io8 NOTES ON BRITISH ICHNEUMON IN AE Ichneumon nigerrimus Type Hym. 3b 1721 <$ selected by Morley. = Coelichneumon nigerrimus (Stephens, 1835). syn. Coelichneumon derasus (Wesmael, 1844). (syn. nov.) This name is not now invalidated by Ichneumon nigerrimus (Scopoli). (= Sphex nigerrimus Scopoli = Anoplius nigerrimus (Scopoli)). Ichneumon compunctor Type Hym. 3b 1814 ^ selected by Morley. = Ichneumon cessator Mueller, 1776. Ichneumon rufipes Type Hym. 3b 1582 selected by Morley. = Polytribax curvus (Schrank, 1802). (syn. nov.} (comb, nov.} syn. Ichneumon curvus Schrank, 1802. Cryptus rufipes Gravenhorst, 1829. Phygadeuon curvus (Schrank) ; Gravenhorst, 1829. Plectocryptus curvus (Schrank) ; Thomson, 1873 and 1874. Microcyptus curvus (Schrank) ; Thomson, 1883. Mesocryptus (lapsus for Microcryptus} curvus (Schrank) ; Thomson, 1897. Plectocryptus curvus (Schrank) ; Schmiedeknecht, 1905. Confusion has been caused in the interpretation of this species by the fact that one specimen from Stephens' collection (not the type) has the head and thorax of Polytribax curvus male, and on to this has been glued the abdomen of a female Eurylabus torvus Wesmael. The species with oval spiracles which were placed in Microcryptus by Thomson (1883) and the related species which were placed by Schmiedeknecht in Plectocryptus are congeneric with the North American species of Polytribax. Ichneumon maculifrons No type. = Cratichneumon fabricator maculifrons (Stephens, 1835). The specimen selected by Morley as the type has the hind femur red and thus does not agree with the original description, but from the description this species is most probably Cratichneumon fabricator (F.) as stated by Morley, and I propose to use this name for the British subspecies of fabricator. The specimen which Morley selected, however, does belong to the same subspecies. Ichneumon maculicornis Type Hym. 3b 1585 $ selected by Morley. = Phaeogenes maculicornis (Stephens, 1835). syn. Phaeogenes scutellaris Wesmael, 1844. NOTES ON BRITISH ICHNEUMONIN AE 109 Ichneumon cognatus No type. <$. Given as a synonym of Ambly teles subsericans (Gravenhorst, 1820) by Desvignes (1856). Males of this species as well as of the closely related A. elongatus Brischke are present in the Stephens collection. Ichneumon crassicornis Stephens nee Rossi, 1794. Type Hym. 3b 1725 $ selected by Morley. = Probolus concinnus Wesmael, 1853. Ichneumon femorator Type Hym. 3b 1581 $ selected by Morley. = Probolus culpatorius (L., 1758). syn. Probolus alticola (Gravenhorst, 1820). Ichneumon fulvipes No. type. Given as a synonym of annulator F., 1793 (= culex Mueller, 1776) by Desvignes (1856). This agrees with the description. Ichneumon albifrons Type Hym. 3b 1565 $ selected by Morley. = Cratichneumon albifrons (Stephens, 1835). syn. Ichneumon gravenhorstii Boyer de Fonscolombe, 1847, nee Wesmael, 1836, nee Gue"rin-Men6ville,i838. (syn. nov.) It is not conspecific with Ichneumon impugnator Wesmael, of which I have examined the syntypes, which has a conspicuously longer malar space. Ichneumon binotatus No type. = Stenichneumon lineator (F., 1781). (syn. nov.). Given as a synonym of Ichneumon leucomelas Gmelin (= Barichneumon albilineatus (Gravenhorst) by Desvignes, but the description cannot refer to that species. The male of Stenichneumon lineator (F.) agrees with the description and I regard binotatus as a synonym of this species. Ichneumon bipunctorius No type. Not given by Desvignes (1856). From the description = Barichneumon albilineatus (Gravenhorst, 1820). Ichneumon cingulipes Type Hym. 3b 1576 $ selected by Morley. = Amblyteles oratorius (F., 1793). no NOTES ON BRITISH ICHNEUMONIN AE Ichneumon microcephalus Type Hym. 3b 1579 $ selected by Morley. = Ichneumon formosus Gravenhorst, 1829. C s y n - n ov.} I follow Wesmael, who examined the type of formosus, in the synonymy of 7. obsessor Wesmael with that species. Ichneumon fulvoscutellatus No type. The description obviously refers to a discoloured specimen, and since this was obtained in May, most probably to a species of Ichneumon that had hiber- nated. I have been unable to determine the species from the description. Morley has suggested that the name is a synonym of /. terminatorius Gravenhorst. Ichneumon quadrinotatus No type. The specimen which had been selected as the type by Morley is from the Desvignes collection. However, there seems no doubt that the species is a synonym of /. gracilicornis Gravenhorst, as given by Desvignes (1856). Ichneumon concinnatorius No type. = Ichneumon terminatorius Gravenhorst, 1820. Ichneumon dimidiatus Type Hym. 3b 1574 $ selected by Morley. = Amblyteles pallidicornis (Gravenhorst, 1829). Ichneumon diver sorius No type. = Amblyteles armatorius (Forster, 1771). $. Not quoted by Desvignes (1856). Ichneumon triangulator No type. = Amblyteles trifasciatus (Gravenhorst, 1829) teste Morley. Not given by Desvignes (1856). Ichneumon eximius Type Hym. 3b 1817 $ selected by Perkins. = Coelichneumon eximius (Stephens, 1835). syn. Coelichneumon coeruleus (Cresson, 1864). (syn. nov.) There is a female of the North American Coelichneumon coeruleus from the Stephens collection bearing a label in the writing of F. Smith saying that it stood in the Stephens British collection. This specimen agrees entirely with Stephens' descrip- tion and it thus seems certain that it is in fact the type of eximius. NOTES ON BRITISH ICHNEUMONIN AE in Ichneumon erythrogaster Stephens nee Gmelin, 1790. Type Hym. 3b 1720 $ selected by Morley. = Protichneumon coqueberti (Wesmael, 1848). Ichneumon melanopyrrhus Type Hym. 3b 1815 <$ selected by Perkins. = Coelichneumon orbitator (Thunberg, 1822). (syn. nov.) syn. Coelichneumon liocnemis (Thomson, 1888). Morley has synonymized this species with Coelichneumon castaneiventris (Graven- horst), but I have seen no specimens of that species from Britain with the hind femur and tibia red, as is given in the original description of melanopyrrhus. Except that Stephens does not mention the small white marks on the thorax, there would be no doubt that the species here described was C. orbitator. However, the single male of orbitator from the Stephens collection has the thorax covered in dirt and these marks obscured and, moreover, has the apex of the 3rd tergite red and the base of the 4th tergite black as given in Stephens' original description. I have therefore no doubt that this was the specimen that Stephens was describing and have selected it as the type. Roman (1912) synonymized C. liocnemis (Thomson) with /. orbitator Thunberg ; in 1914 he synonymized I. ruficauda Wesmael with this species, but ruficauda, of which I have seen the type series, is completely distinct. As Thunberg states that the legs are red, I have accepted Roman's synonymy of orbitator with liocnemis, ruficauda having legs for the most part black in the specimens I have examined. Ichneumon castanopyga Type Hym. 3b 1577 $ selected by Morley. = Amblyteles castanopyga (Stephens, 1835). syn. Amblyteles rubriventris Wesmael, 1854. Ichneumon pyrrhopus No type. = Cratichneumon fabricator maculifrons (Stephens, 1835). (syn. nov.) This species has been synonymized with Cratichneumon fugitivus (Gravenhorst), but from the description it is unlikely to be that species, as I have never seen a specimen of fugitivus with red hind femora. However, the earlier authors mixed this species with the forms of fabricator with a red abdomen, and it is most probable that the Stephens species is a synonym of C. fabricator maculifrons (Stephens) . Ichneumon gasterator Type Hym. 3b 1567 $ selected by Morley. = Cratichneumon corruscator (L., 1758). In the Stephens collection there is also a specimen of C. fugitivus (Gravenhorst) H2 NOTES ON BRITISH ICHNEUMONIN AE labelled as gasterator ; this no doubt is the form mentioned by Stephens with " pos- terior tibiae sometimes pitchy at apex, and reddish at the base." Ichneumon femorator Type Hym. 3b 1581 $ selected by Morley. = Colpognathus celerator (Gravenhorst, 1807). Ichneumon rufator Type Hym. 3b 1698 $ selected by Morley. = Phaeogenes semivulpinus (Gravenhorst, 1829). (syn. nov.) Ichneumon abdominator Type Hym. 3b 1816 $ selected by Perkins. = Diadromus troglodytes (Gravenhorst, 1829). (syn. nov.) The specimen was unlabelled as to species but had a label " New species " in Smith's handwriting. It is a peculiarly coloured specimen of troglodytes agreeing with Stephens' description. Ichneumon picipes No type. I have been unable to recognize this species from the description, though most probably it is a female Phaeogenes. Ichneumon ruficollis No type. = Barichneumon sanguinator (Rossi, 1794). This synonymy was given by Desvignes (1856). Ichneumon rufescens Type Hym. 3b 1564 $ selected by Morley. = Aoplus ratzeburgii (Hartig, 1838). syn. Stenichneumon pictus (Gravenhorst) Morley. Ichneumon cinctorius Stephens nee Fabricius 1775 Type Hym. 3b 1813 $ selected by Perkins. = Ambly teles indocilis Wesmael, 1844. This type was not previously indicated. Morley (1902) attributes the species to Desvignes (who only re-described it), and selected a so-called type from the latter's collection. The two specimens are, however, conspecific. Trogus atrocaudatus No type. From the description = Callajoppa cirrogastra (Schrank, 1781). I have never seen a British specimen of C. exaltatoria (with which Morley synonymised it) in which the 4th tergite is testaceous. NOTES ON BRITISH ICHNEUMONIN AE 113 Trogus dissimilator No type. From the description = Ichneumon didymus Gravenhorst, 1829 (syn. bisignatus Gravenhorst), as suggested by Morley. III. THE DESVIGNES TYPES OF ICHNEUMONIN AE Morley (1902) has given some notes on the Desvignes types, and all those types, which are in the British Museum, were selected by him. Heinrich (1937) has given further information on them. However, there were various problems left outstand- ing and it has now been possible to re-assess these. I have therefore included a complete list of the Desvignes types. The following names are at present valid : Platylabus obator (Desvignes, 1856). syn. Ichneumon obator Desvignes, 1856. Ichneumon lautatorius Desvignes, 1856. Ichneumon minutorius Desvignes, 1856. syn. /. captorius Thomson, 1887. (syn. nov.) Chasmias paludator (Desvignes, 1854.) syn. Chasmodes paludicola Wesmael, 1857. In the list of types which follows all but the last two species were described by Desvignes in 1856 in the Catalogue of the British Ichneumonidae in the British Museum. Ichneumon maculiventris Type Hym. 3b 1580, ?. = Hepiopelmus leucostigmus (Gravenhorst, 1820). This specimen is also the type of Ichneumon fasciatus Stephens. Ichneumon obator Type Hym. 3b 1583, . = Eriplatys ardeicollis (Wesmael, 1844). (syn. nov.) (c) The Marshall Type of Mesostenus maurus. Mesostenus maurus Marshall, 1873 Type Hym. 3b 1563, ?. = Hoplismenus bidentatus (Gmelin, 1790). (syn. nov.) V. THE L. A. CARR COLLECTION OF ICHNEUMONID AE Through the kindness of Mr. H. C. S. Halton of the Natural History Museum, Wollaton Hall, Nottingham, I have been able to examine the L. A. Carr collection of Ichneumoninae, and to borrow for study specimens of special interest. In the course of this work it has become clear that specimens of continental origin were mixed with the Lichfield specimens. Under Protichneumon fuscipennis (Wesmael) (= Amblyjoppa fuscipennis} are a female labelled " Lichfield 1915 teste Habermehl " and a male, " Lichfield 1916 teste Roman " of the continental form of this species with almost black wings ; in the Harwood collection also were I male and 3 females " Lichfield 1917 " and i female " Lichfield 1919 " of the same form received from L. A. Carr. This form is abundantly distinct, and in the many specimens of this species that I have seen from the British Isles none has approached this wing colour. There were also normally coloured British specimens in the Carr collection. Under Ctenichneumon inspector (Wesmael) were a single pair ; the female agrees completely with two specimens of a very red, central European form of Ctenichneumon messorius (Gravenhorst) which were bought by the late D. S. Wilkinson from Schmiedeknecht, and which were also named inspector by Schmiedeknecht. I have seen much material of messorius from this country, and never any specimens approaching this form in colour ; the male is a specimen of Ambly teles uniguttatus (Gravenhorst), a species of which I have seen no British specimens from other collections. Under Ambly teles uniguttatus there is a specimen of the ordinary British form of Ctenich- neumon messorius. I feel, therefore, that at present it is better to exclude from the British list those species which are included solely on the basis of the Carr collection. It is noteworthy that most of the doubtful specimens are of red forms, whereas in England specimens are most usually darker than central European forms. Up to 1919 Carr used short black pins for pinning his material ; from 1921 to 1923 all are pinned on continental steel pins. n8 NOTES ON BRITISH ICHNEUMONIN AE It is of interest to note that the male determined as Eupalamus lacteator (Graven- horst) by Pfankuch is in reality a male of Cratichneumon clarigator (Wesmael) ; I have, however, seen material of the true lacteator from the British Isles. Otherwise, I have not re-examined the general records from the Carr collection. The Types of Ichneumoninae in the L. A. Carr Collection Three species of Ichneumoninae were described from the L. A. Carr collection. All are synonyms. Cratichneumon fallax Habermehl, 1923 = Cratichneumon varipes (Gravenhorst, 1829). (syn. nov.) i syn. Ichneumon anglicanus Schmiedeknecht, 1929. Some of these specimens are a little discoloured by cyanide. Cratichneumon varipes stands in the collection under varipes, fallax and magus. Barichneumon carri Habermehl, 1923 = Barichneumon gemellus (Gravenhorst, 1829). (syn. nov.) This is rather a dark form, as are most British specimens. Amblyteles duplicator Roman, 1923 = Hybophorellus injucundus (Wesmael, 1854). (syn- nov.} The type of duplicator is a female. There is also a single male of Hybophorellus injucundus in the collection. (A number of the very interesting species present in the collection are represented by a single pair.) I have not seen the female type of injucundus, which was described from a specimen sent to Wesmael from the Stock- holm Museum ; this is described as having the hind legs darker than in the above specimen, but otherwise, in structure and sculpture, agreeing very well. I have seen two other specimens of the male of this species, both from Schmiedeknecht, the one purchased by Wilkinson and the other from the Morley collection. Hybophorellus injucundus is, of course, quite distinct from H. aulicus (Gravenhorst, 1829). VI. SPECIES TO BE DELETED FROM THE LIST OF BRITISH ICHNEUMONINAE In the course of revising the British species of Ichneumoninae it has been neces- sary to re-assess the records of certain of the earlier British authors. No material could be named at all adequately until Wesmael published his Tentamen disposi- tionis methodicae Ichneumonum Belgii in 1844. Prior to that date the descriptions of Ichneumoninae were given with almost no idea of any comparsion of species, and the groupings were based on colour. Wesmael was the first author to divide the subfamily on structural characters, and revolutionized the systematics of the group. The next major advance is found in the works of C. G. Thomson, whose discovery of further structural characters pointed the way to a much sounder appreciation of NOTES ON BRITISH ICHNEUMONI N AE 119 the group. Unfortunately the workers who immediately followed Thomson made no use of many of the characters that he indicated as of great significance, and the study of the Ichneumoninae continued with the description of great numbers of species, described with the use of a very limited range of characters and with great emphasis on colour. Further, almost no examination of types was undertaken. In recent years Gerd Heinrich, who has correlated many of the European species, genera and tribes with exotic forms, has again made a great contribution to the study of this subfamily. For myself, I have found it best to base my determination of species, in greater part, on the work of Thomson, together with Wesmael's descriptions. Also Wesmael examined much of the type material of the Gravenhorst species, which are, at the present time, not available for study, and thus the value of his collection is greatly enhanced for research purposes. I was most fortunate in being able to spend a fortnight in Brussels studying the Wesmael collection, which naturally gave me much greater confidence in the interpretation of these species. A point of consider- able interest was that in the majority of cases it had been possible to determine the Wesmael species correctly from the published work of Thomson and Wesmael. A certain number of these species I had failed to determine from the keys of Ber- thoumieu and Schmiedeknecht ; and from the material that has been sent me by other workers, and the determinations that I have seen given by them, I have found that others, too, have experienced the same difficulties. Desvignes, in 1856, examined the Stephens collection which had come to the British Museum in 1853. It is evident from the labels on certain of the specimens that where Desvignes did not agree with the Stephens determinations, he placed the specimens under the species that he thought correct, and if otherwise unknown to him, he excluded these species from his catalogue. Where I have seen no further specimens of these species in the collections that I have examined, I also propose to exclude them from my consideration of British species. In addition, I propose to exclude those species first recorded by Marshall, the present whereabouts of which is unknown. Stephens frequently gave descriptions of the other sex of species, drawn from Gravenhorst's description, if he thought that he had recognized one sex of the species. Where it was later shown that Gravenhorst had wrongly associated the sexes, Marshall recorded both names in his list, based on the descriptions given by Stephens. Hence a number of species were brought into the British list for which no British specimens ever existed. I have only been concerned with those species of which no subsequent material has been obtained. There are a number of species which were incorrectly determined by the earlier authors but of which genuine material has been captured in recent years. Below are given the names of the 86 species that I consider should now be dropped from the list as given by Kloet and Hincks (1945). Trogus spinosus Morley, 1903 = Hoplismenus bidentatus (Gmelin, 1790). ENTOM. Ill, 4. 10 120 NOTES ON BRITISH ICHNEUMONIN AE Hoplismenus bispinatorius (Thunberg, 1822) The type of this species is conspecific with H. perniciosus Gravenhorst, 1829, according to Roman (1912). I follow Thomson in regarding perniciosus as distinct from bidentatus (Gmelin). It is the latter species which is present in Britain. Hoplismenus maurus (Marshall, 1873) = Hoplismenus bidentatus (Gmelin, 1790). Hybophorellus aulicus (Gravenhorst, 1829) This species was introduced by Marshall, but the location of the specimen on which the record was based is unknown to me. Reference to Wesmael's description of Amblyteles injucundus will show that it is not a synonym of aulicus. It is described as having the cheeks obliquely striate, and I regard Amblyteles duplicator Roman as being a synonym of injucundus. I have not seen the types of injucundus or aulicus. A single male of Amblyteles injucundus (Lichfield, 1923 ; teste Schmiedeknecht) and the type of Amblyteles duplicator Roman (Lichfield, 1922) are in the Carr collection. Protichneumon fusorius (L., 1761) This name seems originally to have been included in the British list as the identi- fication of Amblyjoppa fuscipennis (Wesmael), and this latter species appears as fusorius in the early collections that I have seen and also in the Morley collection. 1 believe that the inclusion of similatorius (F.) by Marshall was due to his thinking this name correct for part of the fusorius of British authors. Bignell had a male of /. primatorius Forster from Kilmore, Ireland, and a female of Amblyjoppa fusci- pennis, ex Ch. porcellus, iS.vi.iSSy (/. H. Wood], under this name. In the Carr collection the single male (1915 ; teste Habermehl) and a single female (1916 ; teste A. Roman) are specimens of pisorius (L.), and it would appear therefore that Carr wrongly transcribed the name. Although the female of fusorius is completely distinct from that of Amblyjoppa fuscipennis, the males of these two species are difficult to differentiate. The best characters on which to distinguish them are the form of the lower margin of the mesopleurum which, when viewed dorsolaterally, is more strongly sinuate in fusorius than in fuscipennis, and the pronotal collar which centrally is sub-equal in length to the distance between the posterior ocelli, whereas in fuscipennis it is conspicuously shorter than this distance ; fusorius has the ventral fold clearly developed on sternites 2 and 3 of the gaster, whereas in fuscipennis it is only clearly developed on sternite 2 ; also the hind tarsus is distinctly infuscate apically in fusorius. P. fusorius male is of course at once distinguished from the other Western European species of Pro- tichneumon in having no ventral plica on sternite 4 of the gaster. Protichneumon disparis (Poda, 1761) Stephens recorded this species under Trogus flavatorius Gravenhorst, 1829. The species, however, was not included by Desvignes in his catalogue and I also exclude it. NOTES ON BRITISH ICHNEUMONIN AE 121 Coelichneumon sugillatorius (L., 1758) Stephens recorded C. cyaniventris (Wesmael, 1858) as this species. The Desvignes specimens and those in the Morley and Bignell collections were also all cyaniventris. Coelichneumon sinister (Wesmael, 1848) First recorded by Marshall, who included it as being the male which Gravenhorst associated with the female of leucocerus and which Wesmael later described as sinister. Stephens quoted a description of both male and female of leucocerus, and it appears that Marshall included the species on this evidence. The male of sinister has the flagellum marked with white centrally ; the female has a scopulate tubercle beneath the hind coxa, and the flagellum not " rolled " apically in dead specimens. Coelichneumon nothus (Holmgren, 1880) This is included by Morley (Brit. Ichs. 1 : 29) as a variety of comitator (L.) (recte auspex (Mueller)), but he does not state that he knew of any British specimens of this form. Coelichneumon periscelis (Wesmael, 1844) This species was first recorded by Marshall as being the female of the species which Gravenhorst had associated with the male of his Ichneumon pallifrons. Stephens gives a description of both sexes of pallifrons and it appears that Marshall included the species on this evidence. Specimens that I have seen determined as this species are incorrectly named. That recorded by Morley (Brit. Ichs. 1 : 27) from the Bignell collection is a male of Stenichneumon militarius (Thunberg) ; it is in fact the specimen that Bignell recorded as Ichneumon pistorius Gravenhorst (= militarius} from Bickleigh 2o.viii.i88i. In addition to the characters given by Wesmael and Thomson for this species, it differs from desinatorius (Thunberg, 1822) (syn. subguttatus (Gravenhorst, 1829)) in having the gena more weakly and more sparsely punctate and the malar space shorter. Coelichneumon funebris (Holmgren, 1864) = biannulatus Gravenhorst, 1820, sec Thomson. g = derasus Wesmael, 1844, sec Thomson = nigerrimus Stephens (1835). There has been much confusion in the association of funebris (Holmgren) male with its correct female. The specimens that I have seen so named from this country are mostly the males of Coelichneumon nigerrimus (Stephens) (e.g., the specimens in the Cambridge Museum cf. Kerrich, 1935, Trans. Soc. Brit. Ent., 2 : 38). The single specimen in the Carr collection (1921 ; teste Schmiedeknecht) is a male of Coelich- neumon purpurissatus Perkins (see p. 138). I accept Thomson's interpretation of biannulatus, and this species is unknown to me from the British Isles. Thomson states that the male of derasus (Wesmael) stood in several examples under /. funebris in Holmgren's collection (Thomson, 1893, Opusc. ent. 18 : 1907) ; on the same page he gives notes on the true male of biannulatus. 122 NOTES ON BRITISH ICHNEUMONIN AE Coelichneumon moestus (Gravenhorst, 1829) This species was first recorded by Marshall. I have seen no specimens from Britain, and no specimen of it is present either in the Marshall or Fitch collection (the latter collection contains a number of specimens from Marshall). Coelichneumon puerulus (Kriechbaumer, 1890) This species was first recorded on a misidentified male of Barichneumon gemellus (Gravenhorst) (see Kerrich, 1935, Trans. Soc. Brit. Ent. 2 : 38). C. puerulus is a species completely unknown to me. Cratichneumon externus (Berthoumieu, 1895) The specimen determined as this in the Hancock collection is a female of Barich- neumon Acceptor (Scopoli). C. externus is a species completely unknown to me. Cratichneumon fallax Habermehl, 1923 This is a synonym of Cratichneumon varipes (Gravenhorst, 1829). Cratichneumon dissimilis auctt. angl. = Cratichneumon jocularis (Wesmael, 1848). The male of Aoplus ochropis (Gmelin) has been much confused with this species. In the Johnson collection the specimens from Newcastle, Co. Down were jocularis, those from Coolmore, Co. Donegal were ochropis. In the Morley collection are 7^ Cratichneumon nigritarius (Gravenhorst), 2^ Cratichneumon fb'rsteri (Wesmael), 2$ Aoplus ochropis and i$, The Mound, 8 . viii . 1900 ( Yerbury) of Cratichneumon jocularis. In the Carr collection was a <$ Aoplus ochropis, Chobham, 19. ix. 1891 (Beaumont) and 4 Cratichneumon nigritarius (2 teste Roman, i var. teste Habermehl and i var. teste Pfankuch), all from Lichfield. There has been much confusion, systematically, between dissimilis, which I have not seen from Britain, and jocularis. I have followed Wesmael as being the first reviser of Ichneumon dissimilis Gravenhorst ; he selected the female, of which he saw the Gravenhorst specimen, as being the type. The male which Gravenhorst associated with dissimilis female is Cratichneumon jocularis (Wesmael). The two species can be distinguished as follows : A. $. Mesoscutum polished, with at most only a weak indication of microsculpture between the punctures on the disc, the lateral lobes with sparse, shallow, irregularly spaced punctures ; hind coxa, beneath, largely smooth in the apical two-thirds with only a few coarse, scattered punctures ; hind femur and hind tibia with a conspicuous, black, apical mark ; thyridiae a a little narrower. o*. Face, cheeks (at least on the orbits) and the outer orbits below, yellow ; front coxa and trochanter broadly marked with yellow, middle coxa and trochanter usually with yellow marks ; lateral lobes of the mesoscutum more finely and shallowly punctate than the middle lobe in NOTES ON BRITISH ICHNEUMON IN AE 123 front of the disc ; hind femur broadly black apically, hind tibia black in apical half ; tarsi black; antenna with no white band ..... dissimilis (Gravenhorst, 1829). (syn. Ichneumon citrinops Wesmael, 1857 <$ ; citrinops Wesmael Kriechbaumer, 1893 ?c? ; zephyrus Wesmael, 1857 (sec Wesmael) ; dissimilis Gravenhorst Wesmael, 1859 ?). B. $. Mesoscutum dull, the punctures of the lateral lobes similar to those of the central lobe before the disc, at least for the greater part coriaceous between the punctures ; hind coxa with the punctures only a little more widely spaced in the apical half than basally ; hind femur and tibia entirely red ; thyridiae a little broader. J. Face, and usually the outer orbits below, ivory, the cheeks black ; front coxa and tro- chanter at most weakly marked with ivory ; middle coxa and trochanter rarely with ivory marks ; lateral lobes of the mesoscutum coarsely punctate, the punctures comparable with those on the middle lobe before the disc ; hind femur weakly, narrowly infuscate at the apex ; hind tibia infuscate at most in apical quarter ; tarsi often, at least in part, pale ; antenna most usually with a white ring ....... jocularis (Wesmael, 1848). (syn. Ichneumon dissimilis Gravenhorst $ nee $, 1829 ; punctifrons Holmgren $ 1864 ; dissimilis Gravenhorst Taschenberg, 1866 ; dissimilis Gravenhorst Holmgren , 9-10. vi. 1912 (F. C. Woodforde) (Hope Department, Oxford). Cornwall ; Carbis Bay, 2$, 29. viii. 1928 and 13. ix. 1931 (A. Thornley) (C. Morley Coll.). Coelichneumon serenus (Gravenhorst, 1820) This I regard as a distinct species. Of it I have seen only i male, Desvignes Coll., and 2 females from the old British collection in the British Museum. Coelichneumon truncatulus (Thomson, 1886)* I am now also regarding this species as distinct. ENGLAND : Lanes ; Kent ; Surrey ; Herts ; Bucks. 13^, 11$, v-vi. (B.M.Coll.) NOTES ON BRITISH ICHNEUMONIN AE 139 HERESIARCHINI Heresiarches eudoxius (Wesmael, 1844)* ENGLAND : Hants ; New Forest, Minstead Wood, i<$, I5.vii.i934 (C. Morley) ; , i? (Capron) (cf. Morley, British Ichs. 1 : 203, footnote). (C. Morley Coll.) ICHNEUMONINI Hoplismenus bidentatus (Gmelin, 1790) syn. Hoplismenus bispinatorius auctt. angl. Aoplus defraudator (Wesmael, 1844)* SCOTLAND : Inverness and Perthshire, and IRELAND : Co. Wicklow ; 3^, n$, vi ix (B.M.Coll.) Aoplus altercator (Wesmael, 1855) ENGLAND : Bucks and Somerset. SCOTLAND : Perthshire and Inverness. IRE- LAND : Co. Wicklow. 2$, 9$, vi viii. (B.M.Coll.) Aoplus virginalis (Wesmael, 1844)* ENGLAND : Suffolk ; Staverton Thicks, 2$, n.vii.i9i4 (C. Morley). (C. Morley Coll. det. as Barichneumon eupitheciae Brischke.) Cratichneumon clarigator (Wesmael, 1844)* ENGLAND : Surrey ; Hunts ; Herts ; Kent. 15,^, 2$, v-vii. (B.M.Coll.) Cratichneumon jocularis (Wesmael, 1848) syn. Cratichneumon dissimilis auctt. angl. IRELAND : Co. Down ; Newcastle, 2$ (W. F. Johnson] (Dublin Museum). ENGLAND : N. Yorkshire. SCOTLAND : Nairn and Aberdeen. IRELAND : Co. Wicklow. 6<$. (B.M.Coll.) SCOTLAND: "The Mound," i$, 8. viii. 1900 (Yerbury). (Morley Coll.) Cratichneumon pseudocryptus (Wesmael, 1857)* ENGLAND : i$. (Capron) (In C. Morley Coll. under Plectocryptus tinctorius (Gravenhorst)). Barichneumon leucocheilus (Wesmael, 1844)* ic?, labelled " 734 transfuga " from British Collection. ENGLAND : Surrey ; Byfleet, i$, 26-29^.1949 (R. B. Benson). (B.M.Coll.) Barichneumon praeceptor (Thunberg, 1822) syn. Barichneumon bilunulatus auctt. angl. I 4 o NOTES ON BRITISH ICHNEUMONIN AE Barichneumon coxiglyptus Heinrich, 1951 syn. Barichneumon incubitor auctt. angl. A rather common species. In the B.M. Coll. is material from Surrey ; Suffolk ; Devon ; Cambs ; Herts ; Hereford ; Kent, v-vi, viii-ix. Barichneumon citator (Thunberg, 1822) ENGLAND: Devon; Dartmoor, i<$, i.vi.i935 (R. C. L. Perkins); Lydford, i$, 8-10 . ix . 1946 (/. F. Perkins) . (B.M.Coll.) Ichneumon exilicornis Wesmael, 1857* There is a single $ of this species from the Desvignes collection. (B.M.Coll.) Ichneumon tuberculipes Wesmael, 1848* This species has most usually been recorded as languidus Wesmael in Britain. In the British Museum collection there is material from Devon, Hants and Essex. Ichneumon megapodius Heinrich, 1949 A parasite of Amathes alpicola and I have examined 4 males and 3 females, all reared from pupae of this host from Perthshire (K. Todd) and Inverness (P. Harwood}. British specimens are much more extensively marked with red than those from the Alps. Ichneumon fuscatus Gravenhorst, 1829 There is a single female which may belong to the above species, and which is quite distinct from any other species known to me, from Surrey ; Chobham, 9 . vi . 1910 (G. Le Marchant). (B.M.Coll.) Ichneumon eurycerus Thomson, 1890 SCOTLAND: Inverness; Nethy Bridge, i$, 30. v. 1931; Perth; Rannoch, i$, v.1922; ENGLAND: W. Suffolk, i$, 1928 (P. Harwood). (B.M.Coll.) Ichneumon crassifemur Thomson, 1886* I have only seen material of this species from the Desvignes and Stephens collec- tions. It was previously regarded as a synonym of molitorius L. Ichneumon melanotis Holmgren, 1864 This species, too, I regard as distinct from molitorius. In the British Museum collection there is material from Hants, Bucks and Inverness. Ichneumon septentrionalis s. sp. atrifemur nom. nov. syn. scelestus Perkins, 1952, nee Cresson, 1864. For information concerning this species see Perkins, 1952, Bull. ent. Res. 48 : 361. NOTES ON BRITISH ICHNEUMONIN AE 141 Ichneumon lautatorius Desvignes, 1856* This species is now regarded as being distinct from sarcitorius L. Exephanes amabilis Kriechbaumer, 1895 IRELAND : Co. Meath, i$, ix. 1922 (G. L. R. Hancock] det. G. Heinrich. ENGLAND : Cambs ; Adventurers fen, i<$, 8. vii. 1924 (G. L. R. Hancock}. (B.M.Coll.) Norfolk ; Wroxham, i$, 3.ix.i9O2 (G. A. K. Marshall}. (Hope Department, Oxford). Exephanes caelebs Kriechbaumer, 1890 IRELAND : Co. Cavan ; Lisney, i$, 31. .1936 ; Sandpit, Arva Road, i$, 21. v. 1934 (R. C. Farris} ; Co. Wicklow ; Enniskerry, i$, 25.viii.i935 (/. F. Perkins}. (B.M.Coll.) Thyrateles camelinus (Wesmael, 1844)* ENGLAND : Essex, Loughton, i$ (G. C. Champion) ; i$, Stephens Coll. (B.M.Coll.) Both specimens were previously determined as Ctenicheunom castigator (F.). Ctenichneumon rubroator (Ratzeburg, 1852) syn. Ctenichneumon melanocastaneus auctt. angl. Not uncommon. ENGLAND : Devon ; Essex ; Cornwall ; vi vii. (B.M.Coll.) Ctenichneumon devylderi (Holmgren, 1871) syn. Ctenichneumon repentinus auctt. angl. There has been confusion between this species and repentinus (Gravenhorst), of which I have seen no specimens from Britain. ENGLAND : Bucks and Essex, 6<^, 5$. (B.M.Coll.) Spilichneumon johansoni (Holmgren, 1871) ENGLAND : Northants ; Herts ; Kent ; Bucks ; Surrey. $<$, 4$. (B.M.Coll.) Spilichneumon stagnicota (Thomson, ENGLAND : Gloucestershire ; Forest of Dean, High Meadow Woods, i$, 9. vi. 1936 (E. B. Britton and /. F. Perkins} ; Hants; New Forest, i$, 15. vi. 1912 (G. T. Lyle) ; Hereford ; Malvern Hills, i$, 20-21. iv. 1935 (R. B. Benson) ; Kent ; Tun- bridge Wells, i?, viii.1920 (C. G. Nurse). (B.M.Coll.) Ambly teles gradatorius (Thunberg, 1822) syn. Amblyteles egregius (Gravenhorst, 1829). SCOTLAND: Perth; i<$, vi.i9i4, ex Eurois occulta (P. Harwood} ; Rannoch, , vi.i927 (P. Harwood}. (B.M.Coll.) I 4 2 NOTES ON BRITISH ICHNEUMONIN AE Atnbly teles longigena Thomson, 1888. syn. Avnblyteles cerinthius auctt. angl. SCOTLAND : Forfar ; Perth ; Isle of Arran. ENGLAND : Kent ; Devon. 6<$, 7$. (B.M.Coll.) Amblyteles elongatus Brischke, 1878 syn. Amblyteles subsericans var. elongatus Brischke sec Heinrich. This is a common species which used to be determined as subsericans (Gravenhorst), and of which the male appears to be much rarer than the female. Heinrich has described the genus Limerodops for this species. Amblyteles subsericans (Gravenhorst, 1820) syn. Amblyteles fossorius auctt. angl. This is a more robust species than elongatus and is rarer. I have seen material of it from ENGLAND : Bucks, Herts and Glos., the male being more frequently captured than the female. A . subsericans has been given as a synonym of fossorius L., but I have re-examined the male type of that species and found it to be A. viridatorius (F.), a species unknown to me from Britain. Acolobus sericeus Wesmael, 1844* ENGLAND : Essex and Hants, 3$, 5$, the Hants specimens bred from Ectropis luridata (syn. extersaria). (B.M.Coll.) Probolus concinnus Wesmael, 1853* This is a distinct species. ENGLAND : Hants ; W. Suffolk ; Northants ; Corn- wall. 6, 4$, vii-ix. (B.M.Coll.) PLATYLABINI Rhyssolabus arcticus Hellen, 1942 SCOTLAND : Inverness ; Cairn Lochain, 3-4,000 ft., ig, 3.^.1934 (R. B. and/. E. Benson) ; Aviemore, ex Psodos coracina, i, 22^.1948 (A.Richardson). (B.M.Coll.) I am indebted to Mr. G. Heinrich, who pointed out the probable identity of this species. Platylabus intermedius Holmgren, 1871 ENGLAND: Devon; Bickleigh, i (Harwood) ; Frinton, 2$, viii and ix.ixjig (C. G. Nurse) ; Suffolk ; Sudbury, i$, 1916 (P. Harwood) ; Kent ; Halstow Pier (flying south over Thames estuary), i$, 25. ix. 1949 (/. F. Burton). (B.M.Coll.) 3$ ex Eucymatoge subnotata, 18. viii. 1879 (previously det. as pedatorius (F.)) (G. C. Bignell Coll.). Platylabus obator Desvignes, 1856* This is a distinct species, recognizable from pedatorius (F.) by the black stigma and more strongly raised epicnemia, and in the female by the conspicuously black apex to the hind femur. ENGLAND : Devon ; Hereford ; Herts ; Surrey ; Glos. ; Cornwall. 49^, 7$, v-vii. (B.M.Coll.) In 1941 and 1942 the male of this species was quite common flying around Galium molugo in the lanes around Newton Abbot. Platylabus rufiventris Wesmael, 1844.* ENGLAND : Devon ; Dartmoor, i<$, 18. viii. 1934 (R. C. L. Perkins). (B.M.Coll.) Platylabus concinnus Thomson, 1888 ENGLAND : Devon ; Braunton, i<$, 5.vii.i93O (Wright) ; Cornworthy, i$ (T. A. Marshall) ; Essex ; Colchester, 1$, 1909 (Harwood) ; Suffolk ; i$, bred 4. viii. 1911 (C. G. Nurse). Both the females were previously det. as dolorosus (Gravenhorst). (B.M.Coll.) Lichfield, 2$, 1921, det. as Platylabus daemon by Schmiedeknecht. (Carr Coll.) Heinrich has placed this species in Asthenolabus, but in spite of its rather small thyridiae, I consider it better retained in Platylabus. Asthenolabus latiscapus Thomson, 1894 ENGLAND : Devon and Suffolk ex Euphyia cuculata, 7$, 3$. vi-vii. (B.M.Coll.) PHAEOGENINI Dicaelotus orbitalis Thomson, 1891 ENGLAND: Suffolk; Assington, i, i6.v.i9O2 (C. Morley). (B.M.Coll.) IRELAND: Co. Kildare ; Rye Water, i?, 8. vii. 1945 (A. W. Stelfox). (Stelfox Coll.) Dicaelotus pudibundus (Wesmael, 1844)* ENGLAND: Bucks; Slough, i$, 9.^.1937 (0. W. Richards}. (B.M.Coll.) Isle of Wight ; Ryde, i$, n. viii. 1902 and i$, 17. viii. 1903 (det. previously as rufilim- batus (Gravenhorst)). (C. Morley Coll.) 144 NOTES ON BRITISH ICHNEUMONI N AE Dicaelotus pictus (Schiedeknecht, 1903). (comb, nov.) syn. Deloglyptus pictus Schmiedeknecht. ENGLAND : i<$, Desvignes Coll. (previously det. as Herpestomus arridens (Graven- horst)) ; Herts ; Boxmoor, i$, n.v.i935 (R. B. and/. E. Benson). (B.M.Coll.) Dicaelotus punctiventris (Thomson, 1891). (comb, nov.) syn. Deloglyptus punctiventris Thomson. ENGLAND : Bucks ; Burnham, in empty barn, i$, 2i.vii.i94i (0. W. Richards). (B.M.Coll.) Suffolk; Barton Mills, i$, 5.vi.i9i6 (C. Morley) previously det. as Melanomicrus elliotti Morley. (C. Morley Coll.) Dicaelotus erythrostomus Wesmael, 1844 ENGLAND : Hants ; Sopley Common, on sand, i$, i6.vii.i949 (0. W. Richards) ; IRELAND: Co. Galway ; Bencorr, 2,000 ft., i$, 3.^.1946 (R. A. Lever}. (B.M. Coll.) Dicaelotus cameroni Bridgman, 1881 This I regard as a distinct species. I have seen only the type from Britain and a single female from Germany (Ruthe Coll.). Dicaelotus rufoniger Berthoumieu, 1896 syn. Dicaelotus pumilus var. rufoniger Berthoumieu. The majority of the material of this species that I have examined has been from Ireland. In the B.M.Coll. are specimens from Co. Wicklow, Co. Sligo, Co. Kildare and Co. Wexford (A. W. Stelfox), and a $ from Herts ; St. Albans (T. A. Marshall). I have also examined 3$ and 20$ in the A. W. Stelfox Coll. Dicaelotus inflexus Thomson, 1891 ENGLAND : i$ (Desvignes). (B.M.Coll.) IRELAND : i$. (Stelfox Coll.) Dicaelotus morosus Wesmael, 1855 ENGLAND : Bucks ; Kent. IRELAND : Co. Leitrim. 27$. (B.M.Coll.) Eparces grandiceps Thomson, 1891* No locality, i$, 14. iv. 1900, det. as C. opprimator C.M., ix. 1902. (C. Morley Coll.) This is probably the specimen recorded by Morley from Bramford Marshes, near Ipswich (Brit. Ichs. 1 : 281). Micrope macilenta (Wesmael, 1844) IRELAND : Co. Kildare; Skerries Bog, i$, 23. ix. 1948 (A. W. Stelfox). (Stelfox Coll.) I have followed Thomson's interpretation of this genus and species. NOTES ON BRITISH ICHNEUMONINAE 145 Diadromus tenax Wesmael, 1844* ENGLAND : !<, Desvignes Coll. (B.M.Coll.) Diadromus albinotatus (Gravenhorst, 1829) ENGLAND: Devon; Newton Abbot, 2$, 3.viii.i94i (/. F. Perkins) and i$, 6.viii.i94i (R. C. L. Perkins). (B.M.Coll.) Phaeogenes curator (Thunberg, 1822) ENGLAND : i, Desvignes Coll. ; Monmouth ; Trelleck Beacons, i, io.vi.i936 (E. B. Britton and /. F. Perkins). (B.M.Coll.) Phaeogenes elongatus Thomson, 1891 ENGLAND: Herts; Bricket Wood, i$, 17^.1936 (R. B. Benson). (B.M.Coll.) No locality, 1$, bred ex E. nigricostana (Bignell) ; Suffolk ; Monks Soham Garden, ic?, 14.^^.1917; i$, without data. All previously det. as Centererus opprimator (Gravenhorst). (C. Morley Coll.) ALOMYINI Alornya semiflava Stephens, 1835* A rather common species, appearing later in the year than debellator (F.) (see Perkins, 1952, Bull. ent. Res. 48 : 363). XI. DESCRIPTIONS OF NEW SPECIES OF BRITISH ICHNEUMONINAE Below are given the descriptions of the species that I believe to be previously undescribed. Due to the lack of grouping of the many species that have already been described, it is very difficult indeed to be at all certain of this. When the opportunity arises for someone who has very extensive collections of the European species of this subfamily, to see all the types that are scattered throughout Europe, it is certain that many species that are now thought to be distinct will prove to be already described under other names. Ichneumon quartanus sp. nov. Similar to Ichneumon insidiosus Wesmael (of which I have examined the series of syntypes) in general facies and in the relatively short basal segments of the flagel- lum, but at once distinguished from that species in having a large, ivory, apical spot on tergite 5 of the gaster. .. Head distinctly narrowed behind the eyes ; malar space long, longer than the post-anellus (malar space : breadth of base of mandible about 1-2:1); mandible strongly narrowed to the apex, the lower tooth distinct ; inner orbits sub-parallel centrally ; antenna with 42-44 seg- ments ; flagellum with the basal segments somewhat short (Fig. 6), conspicuously widened beyond the middle and strongly attenuate apically, beneath, at its widest, with the flattened I 4 6 NOTES ON BRITISH ICHNEUMONIN AE ventral area of the segments a little broader than long ; post-anellus length : breadth about 1-5:1; irons, dorsally, coarsely rugose-punctate, with only indistinct microsculpture ; face rather coarsely punctate, irregularly striate beneath the antennal sockets and, in part, on the epistoma ; clypeus rather coarsely, rather sparsely punctate with an apical row of closer punctures. Thorax similar in sculpture to insidiosus, but the pronotum, laterally, with coarser punctures ; propodeum with the area superomedia a little transverse ; area petiolaris rugose-punctate, not divided from the more coarsely rugose areae internae ; middle tarsus a little stout as in insidiosus (Fig. 7) ; hind femur (Fig. 8) a little thinner than in insidiosus, length : breadth about 3-9 : i (in insidiosus about 3-6 : i) ; hind coxa closely punctate, with no scopa. Gaster with the central area of post-petiole with the striae rather close and rather regular ; tergite 2 with moderately broad thyridiae (breadth : distance between thyridiae about i : 1-25), rather closely punctate, in part striate between the gastrocoeli and centrally, tergite 3 basally with the punctures comparable with those at the apex of tergite 2, becoming sparser apically, but still clearly impressed. FIGS. 6-8. Ichneumon quartanus, $ ; fig. 6, Antennal segments 3 and 4 fig. 7, middle tarsus ; fig. 8, hind femur. Colour : head black, inner orbits sometimes yellow or red ; scape and pedicel black, segments 3-8 of antenna red, 9-15/16 ivory, the following segments fuscous or black ; thorax black, scutellum largely ivory ; gaster with the tergites black, the post-petiole in part and tergites 2-3 red (3 sometimes fuscous apically) ; tergites 4-7 with an apical ivory spot, that on 4 being narrower than the spot on 5 ; coxae and trochanters black, trochantelli red ; femora red with the hind femur broadly black dorsally and apically ; tibiae and tarsi red, the hind tibia narrowly infuscate apically and the apical hind tarsal segments infuscate ; wings yellowish clouded, costal vein and stigma pale testaceous. Length : 12 mm. . Unknown. HOLOTYPE. $. Hym. 3b 1821. ENGLAND 20. vi. 1937 (A. E. Wright}. (B.M.Coll.) PARATYPE. $. SCOTLAND : Inverness ; Nethy Bridge, (B.M.Coll.) Westmorland ; Langdale Pikes, 1931 (P. Harwood). Ichneumon caproni sp. nov. Closely related to Ichneumon nereni Thomson and to minutorius Desvignes (= captorius Thomson). (I have examined the type or syntypes of all these species.) It differs from both these species in having a thicker hind femur and in having the NOTES ON BRITISH ICHNEUMONIN AE head less sharply and more convexly narrowed behind the eyes ; the post-petiole is less strongly striate as in nereni, but has no white spot at the apex of tergite 5 (in the seven examples seen), whereas in nereni it is most usually present. $. Head convexly narrowed behind the eyes (Fig. 9) ; malar space long, but slightly shorter than the post-anellus ; mandible strongly narrowed to the apex, the lower tooth distinct ; inner orbits sub-parallel centrally ; antenna with 32-34 segments, flagellum with the basal segments elongate, distinctly widened beyond the middle and attenuate apically ; post-anellus length : breadth about 2:1; ninth antennal segment about as long as broad ; frons rugose- punctate above, with microsculpture ; face punctate, striate-punctate beneath the antennal sockets, and with sparser, coarser punctures on the epistoma, clypeus basally with the punctures similar to those on the epistoma, at most with a few scattered punctures in the apical half. II 12 FIGS. 9-12. Head dorsally, hind femur laterally : figs. 9 and n, Ichneumon caproni, figs. 10 and 12, I. nereni, $. Thorax similar in sculpture to nereni, though the punctures on the whole are a little smaller and closer ; propodeum with the area superomedia a little transverse, the area petiolaris not margined laterally, punctate or punctate-rugose, becoming rugose, narrowly, dorsad, but clearly differentiated from the more coarsely rugose areae internae ; front and middle tarsi a little broader than in nereni ; the hind femur a little incrassate, length : breadth about 3-5:1 (Fig. n) ; hind coxa a little more finely and a little more closely punctured than in nereni, with no scopa. Gaster with the post-petiole rather finely striate ; tergite 2 rather coarsely punctate, some- what striate between the gastrocoeli and centrally, the thyridiae rather narrow (breadth : distance between thyridiae about i : 1-75) ; tergite 3 basally, similar in sculpture to the apical half of tergite 2, the punctures very shallow or erased apically. Colour : head black, inner orbits red, or yellow or at least with pale marks on the frontal orbits ; scape black, sometimes marked with red, pedicel fuscous ; antennal segments 3-8 red, sometimes marked with fuscous, segments 8/9-14/15 ivory, the following segments fuscous or black ; thorax black, the sub-alar callus sometimes marked red, scutellum for the greater part ivory ; gaster with the tergites black, except the apex of the post-petiole marked with red ; tergites 2-3 red, sometimes marked with yellow, 6 and 7 with a large, ivory, apical spot ; legs 148 NOTES ON BRITISH ICHNEUMONIN AE with the coxae and trochanters black, the trochantellus red ; front and middle femora red, broadly marked with black ; hind femur black narrowly red basally ; front and middle tibiae and tarsi testaceous, the apex of middle tibia and apical tarsal segments sometimes infuscate ; hind tibia testaceous, fuscous apically ; hind tarsus fuscous or black, sometimes paler basally ; wings very weakly smoky, the costal vein pale testaceous, fuscous apically, the stigma testaceous. Length: 9-11 mm. o*. Unknown. HOLOTYPE. ?. Hym. 3b 1822. ENGLAND : (Capron Coll.] (B.M.Coll.) PARATYPES. ENGLAND : i$ (Capron Coll., det. as gracilicornis by Capron) ; i$, B.M. British Coll. (det. as ammonius in Desvignes' catalogue). GERMANY : i, Ant., 6.x (Buchecher) ; i$, Lag., 4.viii.i865 (Buchecher), France: i$, Castellane, g.iv. 1931 (C. Morley). (B.M. Coll.) ENGLAND : i$, Capron Coll. (det. as gracilicornis by Capron). (C. Morley Coll.) Ichneumon aquilonius sp. nov. Related to vulneratorius Zetterstedt, walkeri Wesmael and polyonomus Wesmael (this latter I regard as a subspecies of walkeri, from the Alps). It differs from vul- neratorius in having the clypeus remotely punctate in the apical half and the central area of the post-petiole much more strongly, longitudinally striate ; from walkeri and polyonomus in having the hind coxa much more coarsely, though closely punctate beneath and with no trace of a scopa ; superficially it differs from all three in having an orange-coloured scutellum (though this may well vary). As with most of these northern species, the colour will probably show great variation. $. Head strongly narrowed behind the eyes ; malar space long, about i times as long as the breadth of base of mandible ; mandible strongly narrowed to the apex, the lower tooth distinct ; inner orbits diverging a little ventrad ; antenna with 33 segments ; flagellum with the basal segments elongate, conspicuously widened beyond the middle and attenuate apically, at the widest with the flattened, ventral area of the segments slightly wider than long ; post- anellus length : breadth = 1-7:1; flagellar segment 5/6 quadrate ; frons, dorsally rugose- punctate and in part with microsculpture on the rugae and in the interspaces between the punctures ; face, for the most part, with clear punctures becoming rugose-punctate beneath the antennal sockets and in part centrally ; clypeus with rather sparse punctures, very sparse in the apical half but with an apical row of more or less distinct, rather close punctures. Thorax similar in sculpture to vulneratorius ; propodeum with the area superomedia quadrate or a little transverse, more or less closed posteriorly, the area petiolaris not margined laterally, punctate dorsad, rugose ventrad and thus little differentiated in sculpture from the areae internae ; front and middle tarsi thin, as in vulneratorius ; hind coxa closely punctate beneath tending to rugose-punctate before the apex, with no scopa ; hind femur moderately thin as in vulneratorius. Gaster with the central area of the post-petiole coarsely, longitudinally striate ; tergite 2 with broad transverse thyridiae (breadth : distance between thyridiae about 1-8 : i) ; tergite 2 closely punctate, in part striate between the gastrocoeli and centrally ; tergite 3 closely punctate basally, becoming more sparsely punctate apically. Colour : head black with the clypeus, epistoma and inner orbits red ; scape red, fuscous basally ; pedicel fuscous ; basal flagellar segments red or marked with fuscous, antennal seg- ments 8/9-13/14 ivory, beyond this black ; pronotum black with the collar centrally, and the upper margin laterally, red ; mesosternum and mesopleurum black with the sub-alar callus NOTES ON BRITISH ICHNEUMONIN AE 149 marked with red ; mesoscutum red, more or less marked with fuscous anteriorly ; scutellum orange ; post-scutellum red ; propodeum black ; gaster red, the 4th segment sometimes black, the following segments black ; legs red with the coxae and trochanters black (in part, slightly reddish in the type) ; femora sometimes conspicuously marked with black ; apex of hind femur and apical tarsal segments sometimes marked with fuscous ; wings yellowish, the costal vein and stigma pale testaceous. Length : 8 mm. o*. Unknown. HOLOTYPE. $. Hym. 3b 1823. SCOTLAND: Perthshire; Killin, 15-21^.1932 (R. B. Benson}. PARATYPE. $. ENGLAND: Westmorland; Fairfield, c. 2,500 ft., 5.^.1938 (G. J. Kerrich). THYRATELES gen. nov. (Ichneumonini) Clypeus flat ; the occiput somewhat impressed behind the ocelli ; mandibles strongly narrowed to the apex ; pronotal collar rather narrow, the transverse groove deeply impressed ; scutellam strongly convex ; propodeum with the basal groove distinct, the area basalis with no central tubercle, the area superomedia more or less quadrangular, no dentiparal spines ; post-petiole with the central area longitudinally striate or rugose-striate, and not conspicuously FIG. 13. Thyrateles camelinus, $ : 2nd tergite. raised at the line of the spiracles ; gastrocoeli deep and broad, thyridiae distinct (Fig. 13) ; claws impectinate. $ with the hypopygium as in A mblyteles ; the flagellum strongly elongate. Type species Amblyteles camelinus Wesmael. This genus belongs to that group represented in the Holarctic region by Patroclus, CtenamUytdes (syn. Pseudambly teles) and Hybophorellus. All these genera have 150 NOTES ON BRITISH ICHNEUMONIN AE females in which the hypopygium is like Ambly teles, but which have conspicuous and often large thyridiae. A few species in Amblyteles have small thyridiae, but Cteni- chneumon, with which certain of the above genera have previously been confused in Europe, has the thyridiae completely absent. Both Patroclus (to which the European Ctenichneumon sputator (F.) belongs) and Ctenamblyteles have the claws pectinate at least towards the base (this pecten is not to be confused with the row of oblique, contiguous, basal teeth). Hybophorellus has shallow gastrocoeli, a strongly convex clypeus and dentiparal spines. Amongst the material in the British Museum I have noted no species outside this area which would be referable to this group. Descriptions most usually fail to mention the presence or absence of thyridiae which seem important in this section of the Ichneumoninae. Spilichneumon celenae sp. nov. This species belongs to the section of Spilichneumon having, in the female, robust mandibles with the lower tooth small and much shorter than the enlarged upper tooth, the hypostomal carina conspicuously raised and the front and middle tibiae coarsely spinulose. 16 FIGS. 14-17. Antennal segments 2 and 3 : fig. 14, Spilichneumon celenae, $ ; fig. 15, S. simplicidens, $. Mandible, fig. 16, and head dorsally, fig. 17, 5. celenae, $. $. Head with the temples distinctly narrowing behind the eyes (Fig. 17) ; malar space a little shorter than the breadth of base of mandible ; mandible with the sides of the shaft sub- parallel, only very weakly expanded beyond the middle, the upper tooth larger than the lower (Fig. 1 6) ; antenna very little widened beyond the middle, strongly attenuate apically, with 36 segments, the post-anellus short, length : breadth about 1-2:1 (Fig. 14), the 4th antennal segment sub-quadrate ; frons dorsally, coarsely punctate and weakly coriaceous ; face rather coarsely punctate, somewhat striate dorsad and with the punctures becoming finer and sparser towards the malar space ; clypeus (which is relatively a little smaller than in stagnicola) rather coarsely punctate, the punctures more sparse centrally, towards the apex. Thorax : sculpture similar to that of stagnicola ; pronotal collar short ; propodeum with the strongly elongate area superomedia open behind, the lateral carinae erased posteriorly and the area petiolaris divided from the areae internae ; front and middle tarsis a little expanded (mid tarsus with segment 2 about twice as long as broad), hind femur thickened (length : breadth about 3-2 : i). Caster with the post-petiole finely striate ; tergite 2 with small and very shallow gastrocoeli, thyridiae absent, rather finely, rather sparsely punctate, the punctures sparser apically, only striate at the extreme base ; 3rd tergite basally similar in puncturation to the apex of the 2nd, NOTES ON BRITISH ICHNEUMONIN AE 151 apically with the punctures becoming very fine and very sparse ; 4th tergite basally similar in puncturation to the apex of the 3rd, apically, together with the remaining segments with only very fine punctures ; sternites 2 and 3 with a ventral fold. Colour : head black, sometimes with the inner and vertical orbits more or less red-marked ; antenna black or fuscous, with segments 8-13 ivory or marked with ivory ; thorax black, pronotal collar sometimes red-marked centrally, scutellum for the greater part ivory ; legs with the coxae black, trochanters black, narrowly yellow apically ; front and middle trochantelli black or piceous, femora red, black basally, tibiae and tarsi testaceous, the apex of the tarsi somewhat infuscate ; hind trochantellus red, fuscous dorsally, femur black, reddish apically and at extreme base, tibia pale testaceous, fuscous apically, tarsus testaceous with the apices of the segments infuscate ; gaster black with tergites 2 and 3 red, 4 basally, laterally, sometimes red ; tergites 6 and 7 with a large, ivory apical spot ; wings with the costal vein pale testaceous, fuscous apically, stigma pale testaceous. o*. Head with the temples distinctly narrowing behind the eyes ; malar space about half as long as the breadth of base of mandible ; mandible with the sides of the shaft narrowing distally ; antenna with tyloidae on segments 5/6-17/19, that on 5 when present being weak; frons rugose-punctate above ; face coarsely punctate, striate in part below the antennal sockets ; clypeus coarsely punctate, weakly rounded apically ; thorax more coarsely and closely punctured than in the female ; propodeum with the area superomedia elongate and closed posteriorly, the lateral carinae complete, the area petiolaris divided by strong carinae from the areae internae ; hind femur, length : breadth about 3-7 : i. Gaster with the post-petiole more coarsely and irregularly striate than in the $ ; tergite 2 with the gastrocoeli ill-differentiated and shallow, thyridiae absent, rather closely punctured, striate between the gastrocoeli and extending more or less to the apex of the segment ; tergite 3 sub-quadrate, a little more finely and less closely punctate than tergite 2, centrally, basally striate-rugose ; sternites 2 and 3 with a median fold ; hypopygium with a sub-acute, central, apical projection. Colour : head black ; face yellow, black centrally, varying to black with the orbits yellow ; clypeus yellow sometimes marked with black ; scape marked with yellow beneath ; thorax black, collar sometimes red centrally, scutellum marked with yellow, tegula pale testaceous ; coxae black, trochanters black, narrowly yellow apically ; trochantelli testaceous, fuscous dorsally ; front and middle femora red, broadly marked with black ; front and middle tibiae and tarsi testaceous, the tarsi in part infuscate ; hind femur black, narrowly red basally and apically ; hind tibia pale testaceous, fuscous apically ; hind tarsus fuscous, testaceous basally ; gaster black ; extreme apex of post-petiole, and tergites 2 and 3 testaceous ; tergite 4 testaceous laterally, basally ; wings with costal vein pale testaceous, infuscate apically, the stigma pale testaceous. Length : $ 12 mm., $ u mm. HOLOTYPE. $. Hym. 3b 1824. IRELAND : ex Celena haworthii, 1884 (W. V. de F. Kane). (B.M.Coll.) ALLOTYPE. $. IRELAND: Co. Wicklow; Torilagee Mt., 1-2,000 ft., 22. viii. 1937 (A. W. and G. M. Stelfox). (B.M.Coll.) PARATYPES. SCOTLAND: i$, Sutherland; R. Traligal, Glen Dubh, 19. vi. 1948 (J. Balfour-Browne). IRELAND : i<$, same data as allotype. (B.M.Coll.) SWEDEN : i$. (Thomson Coll., Lund University Museum). This species is closely related to simplicidens (Thomson) and agrees with it in the form of the mandible, but simplicidens differs in having the basal flagellar segments more elongate (post-anellus length : breadth about 1-6 : I, 4th antennal segment about 1-3 : i), the hypostomal carina a little less raised, the post-petiole more coarsely striate, tergite 3 in greater part fuscous and the legs much more broadly infuscate. ENTOM. in, 4. 12 152 NOTES ON BRITISH ICHNEUMONIN AE The males from Skane, Ringsjon, which Thomson had associated with the single female type of simplicidens I believe to belong to celenae. Amblyteles (Triptognathus) propinquus sp. nov. Much confusion has existed in Britain between Amblyteles uniguttatus (Gravenhorst) and conspurcatus (Gravenhorst) and Ctenichneumon panzeri (Wesmael). I have now, however, seen material from England which does belong to the uniguttatus group of species with the mandible unidentate, but which appears to be distinct from described species. It may be a subspecies, but this has yet been impossible to determine. I 21 FIGS. 1 8-2 1. Propodeum : fig. 18, Amblyteles conspurcatus, $ ; fig. 19, A. propinquus, fig. 20, A. uniguttatus, $. Apex of penis valve, fig. 21, A, propinquus. NOTES ON BRITISH ICHNEUMONIN AE 153 have also seen material of the same form in the Wesmael collection, from the dunes near Ostend. Only the male is known to me. cJ. More robust than uniguttatus, less robust than conspurcatus. Similar to uniguttatus, but with the vertex deeply and more sharply impressed behind the ocelli ; mesoscutum at least in part a little less closely punctate, the propodeum deeply excised before the dentiparal spines (Fig. 19) (the excision a little less abrupt than in conspurcatus) ; mesopleurum with the speculum clearly punctate (as in uniguttatus) ; thyridiae distinct but small, in breadth subequal to the length of the 4th middle tarsal segment (in uniguttatus broader than this ; in conspurcatus the thyridiae absent). Colour : black ; clypeus sometimes with an ivory spot on each side ; pronotum with the collar centrally and the mark in the hind angles ivory ; sub-alar callus and scutellum in greater part ivory ; gaster with tergites 2-4 testaceous, 4 marked with fuscous ; apical tergites and genital claspers not marked with ivory ; sternites 2-3 and in part 4, testaceous ; front and middle femora red, yellow apically and sometimes dorsally, often marked with black posteriorly and beneath, the tibiae and tarsi pale testaceous, the tarsi in part infuscate ; hind coxa some- times with an ivory, dorsal mark, hind femur red, varying to black but most usually retaining a yellow dorsal stripe (in the darkest specimen seen the femur is black with a reddish dorsal stripe), hind tibia testaceous, narrowly infuscate apically, in dark specimens with the fuscous markings more extensive, hind tarsus fuscous, usually pale at the base ; wings weakly smoky, darker apically, with the costal vein fuscous becoming testaceous in basal , stigma testaceous, margined with fuscous. Penis valves similar to those of uniguttatus and conspurcatus (Fig. 21). Length : 16-18 mm. HOLOTYPE. <$. Hym. 30 1825. ENGLAND: Cambs ; Croydon, 17^1.1945 (C. E. Tottenham). (B.M.Coll.) PARATYPES. ENGLAND: Cambs; 5$, Croydon, 17-23. vi. 1945. (C. E. Totten- ham). Suffolk; Sudbury, Gull Lane, I7.vii.i922 (P. Harwood). (B.M.Coll.) Platylabus stolidus sp. nov. This species belongs to the group of pedatorius (F.), having the strongly expanded hypostomal carina ; it differs from the other species of the group that are known to me in having the temples relatively strongly enlarged. ?. Head with the temples large, sub-parallel directly behind the eyes (Fig. 22) ; frons dorsad distinctly punctate ; face coarsely punctate, the punctures becoming finer towards the orbits and sub-rugose on the epistoma, the inter-antennal tubercle weak ; clypeus closely punctate basally, more sparsely punctate in apical third, little convex (conspicuously flatter than in pedatorius) ; antenna very little widened before the apex, 39 segments, similar to that of pedatorius ; hypostomal carina broad. Thorax with the sculpture similar to that of pedatorius ; the epicnemia not strongly raised ; notauli vaguely impressed anteriorly ; dentiparal area with no apical tooth ; the area supero- media a little transverse ; area petiolaris clearly differentiated by lateral carinae, trans-striate- rugose ; hind femur rather stout, length : breadth about 3-2 : i (of pedatorius about 3-7 : i) ; hind tarsus with segment i a little longer than segments 2 + 3 + 4. Gaster with segment i similar in form and sculpture to that of pedatorius ; tergite 2 with the distance between the thyridiae a little greater than in pedatorius (thyridiae : distance between thyridiae about 1-5 : i) and a little more oblique than in that species, punctate or rugose between the gastrocoeli and behind the thyridiae, otherwise with clear punctures which become shallow 154 NOTES ON BRITISH ICHNEUMONIN AE and ill-defined towards the hind margin, covered in coriaceous sculpture as are the following segments ; tergite 3 with clear, shallow punctures basally, fading out in the apical third. Colour : black ; malar space apically ivory ; frontal orbits marked with yellow, outer orbits sometimes marked with yellow centrally ; antenna with segments 10/11-14/15 with an ivory dorsal stripe, scape with a small, yellow, basal spot beneath ; mandibles red towards apex ; tegulae sometimes marked with pale testaceous ; gaster with the apices of the tergites piceous, tergite 2 piceous basally ; trochantelli narrowly red apically sometimes in part with piceous markings, that of the front leg pale, sometimes testaceous beneath ; front and middle femora and tibiae red, their tarsi fuscous, in part testaceous ; hind femur red, distinctly though rather 22 FIG. 22. Platyldbus stolidus, $ : head dorsally. narrowly black apically, hind tibia black, usually red in basal third, hind tarsus black, the seg- ments reddish basally and segments i and 2 with a small red apical spot ; wings with the costal vein pale testaceous, fuscous apically and the stigma black. Length : 9-11 mm. cJ. Unknown. HOLOTYPE. $. Hym. 3b 1826. ENGLAND : Essex ; Colchester (Harwood). (B.M.Coll.) PARATYPES. BELGIUM: i$, Steinbach, i8.viii.i875 ; i, Francorchamps, 3.viii.i899 (Severiri). (Coll. Tosquinet, Brussels Museum). Differs from pedatorius in the broader temples, the black stigma, the black apex to the incrassate femur, the flatter clypeus. Platylabus odiosus sp. nov. This species belongs to the pedatorius (F.) group. $. Head with temples strongly narrowed behind the eyes, a little convex ; frons, above, coriaceous, with shallow, ill-defined punctures and striae ; face strongly punctate becoming rugose-punctate on the epistoma ; the inter-antennal tubercle weak ; clypeus strongly punctate basally, very sparsely punctate in apical third, convex ; antenna hardly widened before the apex, with 39-40 segments ; hypostomal carina broad. Thorax with the puncturation similar to pedatorius, but with distinct microsculpture between the punctures on the lateral lobe ; the epicnemia not distinctly raised, notauli vaguely impressed anteriorly ; dentiparal area with no apical tooth ; area superomedia less transverse than in NOTES ON BRITISH ICHNEUMONIN AE 155 pedatorius ; area petiolaris clearly differentiated by lateral carinae, striate-rugose ; hind femur with length : breadth about 3-8 : i ; hind tarsus a little thinner than in pedatorius, and with segment i subequal to segments 2 + 3 + 4 (Fig- 2 4)- Gaster a little narrower than in pedatorius, the ist segment similar in form to pedatorius ; tergite 2 with thyridiae : distance between thyridiae about 2 : I (cf. Fig. 26), rugose between the gastrocoeli, otherwise punctate, the punctures becoming very feeble apically, mostly coriaceous, as are the following segments ; tergite 3 with clear, shallow punctures in basal half. Colour : black ; apex of malar space ivory, frontal orbits and usually external orbits centrally, yellow ; antenna with segments 11/12-14/15 with an ivory dorsal stripe, the scape sometimes 26 FIGS. 23-26. Hind tarsal segments 1-4 : fig. 23, Platyldbus pedatorius, $ ; fig. 24, P. odiosus, . Tergite 2 : fig. 25, P. pedatorius, , bred i8.viii.i9ii (C. G. Nurse). Somerset ; Crowcombe, i$, ex Eupithecia expallidata, 9. 1.1949 (E. C. P. C.). I have seen material of pactor bred from Eupithecia insigniata and Eupithecia arceuthata. Herpestomus wesmaeli sp. nov. Related to nasutus Wesmael, but with the head and thorax conspicuously dorso- ventrally flattened, thus approaching the form found in Eriplatys ardeicollis (Wes- mael), but less depressed than in that genus, and without the intumescent first segment of the gaster. 29 FIG. 29. Herpestomus wesmaeli, $ : head and thorax laterally. .. Head with the temples rather short but strongly convex, the vertex broadly and rather deeply excised, and with the plane of the face almost at right angles to that of the frons, which is not intumescent, and with very small antennal scrobes ; malar space about 0-8 times breadth of base of mandible ; mandible with the lower tooth small and well removed from the apex of the upper tooth ; genal carina meeting the hypostomal carina at a distance from the base of the mandible which is less than the malar space ; frons closely punctate, tending to striate- punctate, particularly ventrad ; vertex finely punctate, becoming more finely and more remotely punctate on the temples ; face closely punctate, becoming more finely and more closely punctate on the malar space and with the epistoma convex, sub-quadrate ; clypeus with coarser punctures than the face, convex, and with a narrow flattened anterior margin ; antenna with 24-26 segments, similar in general form to that of nasutus. Thorax distinctly dorso-ventrally flattened (Fig. 29) ; pronotal groove rather shallow, the collar, centrally, broader than in nasutus and with the anterior margin centrally not reflexed, laterally with the furrow transcostate, the hind margin transcostate, punctate dorsad and in the hind angle ; mesoscutum with very weak short notauli, clearly punctate, polished between the punctures except on the middle lobe anteriorly ; scutellum more finely punctured than the mesoscutum centrally, flattened ; mesopleurum punctate, somewhat striate posteriorly, ventrad, the speculum more finely punctate ; sternaulus rather shallow, transcostate, extending to about the middle ; mesosternum elongate, a little more finely punctate than the mesopleurum, viewed laterally with the lateral margin almost straight from the epicnemia to the hind margin. 158 NOTES ON BRITISH ICHNEUMONIN AE the prepectus short ; propodeum dorsally flattened with the broad area petiolaris subequal in length to the large, almost pentagonal area superomedia, the area basalis obsolete or absent, the costula short, strong, the area externa narrow, the area spiracularis slightly widening at the costula ; metapleurum punctate with the clearly denned area coxalis rugose ; hind coxa weakly, obliquely transcostate in the dorsal furrow, finely and closely punctate beneath, the punctures becoming a little coarser and a little sparser apically ; front wing with the 2nd intercubital unpigmented ; hind wing with the nervellus antefurcal. Caster with ist segment rather short, similar to that of nasutus, with distinct, somewhat coarse punctures extending almost from the base nearly to the apex and sometimes, in part, somewhat striate ; tergite 2 with rather broad thyridiae, breadth of a thyridiae : distance between thyridiae about 1-5 : i, gastrocoeli rather short, rugose, the segment otherwise clearly punctate, the punctures obsolete apically, in far the greater part with no microsculpture between the punctures ; tergite 3 with the punctures similar in size to those of tergite 2, obsolete apically ; tergite 4 a little more finely and less deeply punctate, the punctures obsolete in apical half. Colour : black ; usually with the epistoma yellow-marked dorsally, and the face with a yellow spot between the antennal sockets, and the orbit, epistoma, clypeus and apex of malar space often piceous or reddish ; mandible in part reddish ; antenna with the scape, in part, reddish beneath, basal flagellar segments sometimes in part piceous beneath ; pronotal collar, centrally, sometimes yellow or red marked ; tegula yellow marked posteriorly ; coxae black, trochanters narrowly yellowish apically, trochantelli reddish, in part yellowish, rest of the legs reddish, marked with fuscous, the hind legs more extensively fuscous than the front ones, varying to the legs almost completely infuscate ; tergites 2-4 piceous, darker centrally, varying to almost completely black with only the apices of the segments red. cJ. Similar to the $ but narrower ; antenna with 23-24 segments, without tyloidae ; scape and pedicel marked with yellow beneath, face and clypeus yellow, mandibles in greater part yellow ; pronotal collar often marked with yellow centrally ; hind angle of pronotum usually marked with yellow ; sub-alar callus usually marked with yellow ; tegula yellow ; front and middle coxae and trochanters conspicuously marked with yellow, otherwise the legs similarly coloured to $ ; tergites black with the apices of the segments (except i) narrowly yellow. Length : Q* 4 mm., $ 4-5 mm. HOLOTYPE. $. Hym. 3b 1829. ENGLAND: Bucks; Brickhill, S.vi (R. B. Benson). (B.M.Coll.) ALLOTYPE. $. Same data as type. (B.M.Coll.) PARATYPES. 2<^ i$, same data as type (B.M.Coll.) Suffolk ; i$, Barton Mills, fir, 5.vi.i9i6 (C. Morley}. (C. Morley Coll.) IRELAND: Co. Kildare ; i? (A. W. Stelfox). (A. W. Stelfox Coll.) Dicaelotus fitchi sp. nov. This species belongs to the pumilus (Gravenhorst) group (Group A, Thomson, 1891, Opusc. Ent. 15:i6i8). $. Head with the temples sub-parallel directly behind the eyes, strongly convex ; malar space very short, the length about one-third of the breadth of base of mandible (Fig. 30), the genal carina almost straight, meeting the hypostomal carina at a distance from the base of the mandible about equal to half the breadth of base of mandible ; frons, dorsad, with the clear punctures in the main twice as far from each other as the diameter of the punctures, the vertex and temples with finer punctures, the frons, ventrad, trans-striate ; face with the epistoma very short and transverse and strongly convex, divided from the clypeus by a distinct epistomal groove ; face striate-punctate beside the sparsely punctate epistoma, and becoming sparsely NOTES ON BRITISH ICHNEUMONIN AE 159 punctate towards the orbits ; clypeus broad, a little convex, very weakly, broadly projecting centrally apically, basally with rather coarse, sparse punctures ; antenna with 25-26 segments ; basal segments of flagellum very short, post-anellus sub-quadrate, segment 2 a little elongate, 3 sub-quadrate. Thorax : pronotum centrally with only a faint indication of the transverse groove, laterally with the furrow trans-striate (as is the posterior margin in greater part), dorsad punctate, the collar punctate ; mesoscutum with the notauli present anteriorly, clearly punctate, polished between the punctures except on the central lobe anteriorly ; scutellum more finely, more closely punctate, usually with lateral carinae extending to the middle, the scutellar fovea trans- striate ; mesopleurum coarsely punctate, striate-punctate posteriorly, ventrad, the speculum only punctate dorsad ; sternauli extending to about two-thirds, straight, coarsely trans-striate ; mesosternum much more finely and sparsely punctate, the posterior carina broadly interrupted in front of the middle coxae ; propodeum similar to that of pumilus ; hind coxa punctate, striate beneath on the inner margin, outwardly more sparsely punctate apically. Gaster with post-petiole punctate laterally, sometimes with scattered punctures centrally, apically, but still with a distinct, unpunctured, central area ; tergite 2 (with no gastrocoeli or thyridiae) punctate basally (punctate-striate laterally), the punctures becoming weaker and sparser posteriorly ; tergite 3 with the punctures, basally, similar to those in the middle of tergite FIG. 30. Dicaelotus fitchi, 30 head from in front. 2, becoming obsolete apically ; tergite 4 with indistinct punctures in basal two-thirds ; hind wing with the nervellus antefurcal. Colour : black ; clypeus red apically ; mandible pale testaceous ; antenna with scape red- marked beneath and basal flagellar segments marked with red ; pronotum usually with the collar red-marked centrally, hind angles usually red-marked ; legs red, the coxae sometimes infuscate basally, and the hind coxa sometimes entirely black ; femora and tibiae sometimes fuscous marked ; hind tarsus sometimes weakly infuscate ; gaster with tergite I red laterally id apically ; tergites 2 and 3 red with a pair of central, fuscous spots ; tergite 4 red at the base varying to the tergites all black with only the apices of the segments narrowly red or jiceous. ?. In general similar to the $, but the face longer with the epistoma less transverse, the malar space even shorter (conspicuously shorter than in pumilus) , the hypostomal carina arcuately iflexed, but less strongly so than in pumilus ; the punctures generally coarser and closer than the $, gaster with the post-petiole evenly punctate, tergite 4 clearly punctate almost to apex ; itenna with 29 segments, tyloidae on segments 9-16 (those on 15 and 16 small in the single :imen seen). Colour similar to the $, but with the scape yellow beneath, the clypeus entirely yellow, the landible in greater part yellow (facial orbits with an indication of a yellow mark), pronotum irith the collar centrally, and the hind angles marked with yellow, tegula yellow ; front and xiddle coxae and all the trochanters marked with yellow. Length : <$ 6 mm., $ 5-6 mm. 160 NOTES ON BRITISH ICHNEUMONIN AE HOLOTYPE. F. B. White). with red. ALLOTYPE. PARATYPES. $. Hym. 3b 1830. BRITISH ISLES : ex Depressaria apiella (Dr. (Fitch Coll.) This is a specimen with the abdomen little marked <$. BRITISH ISLES (Marshall). (Fitch Coll.) 2$, same data as Allotype. (Fitch Coll.) ENGLAND : Suffolk ; i, Ipswich District, g.vi.iSgy (C. Morley). (B.M.Coll.) I have also examined 3 females which may represent a distinct species, differing from the darkest of the above in having the tibiae fuscous, ivory basally. I have, however been unable to discover any other reliable differences. Two are from IRELAND: Co. Dublin; The Slade of Saggart, 8.vii.i936 (A. W. Stelfox) (A. W. Stelfox Coll.), and the third from GERMANY (Ruthe] (B.M.Coll.). This latter specimen is very small, being about 3-5 mm. long. D. fitchi is superficially most similar to inflexus Thomson, but differs in the shorter malar space, and the 4th antennal segment being relatively a little shorter. Dicaelotus suspectus sp. nov. This species, also, belongs to the pumilus (Gravenhorst) group. . Head with the temples sub-parallel directly behind the eyes, strongly convex ; malar space moderate, about 0-6 times the breadth of base of mandible, the genal carina conspicuously incurved ; frons coarsely punctate, the scrobes polished, vertex and temples with finer punctures, which are sparser except behind the posterior ocelli ; face with the epistoma short, transverse 31 FIG. 31. Dicaelotus suspectus, $ : mesopleurum. and strongly convex, divided from the clypeus by a strong epistomal groove ; epistoma only punctate laterally, the face beside this striate-punctate, the punctures becoming very sparse towards the orbits ; clypeus weakly rounded apically, a little convex, sparsely punctate basally ; antenna with 25 segments, the post-anellus sub-equal to the following segment and sub-quadrate, the sub-apical segments conspicuously transverse. Thorax : pronotum centrally with a weak, transverse groove, laterally with the furrow trans-striate, as in the posterior margin in greater part, punctate dorsad ; mesoscutum with the notauli very short but rather deep, clearly, rather sparsely punctate, polished between the punctures except on the median lobe anteriorly ; scutellum much more finely and more closely NOTES ON BRITISH ICHNEUMONIN AE 161 punctate, carinate laterally to about the middle ; mesopleurum coarsely punctate anteriorly, punctate-striate posteriorly, ventrad, the speculum finely, sparsely punctate ; sternaulus rather broad, coarsely trans-striate, extending to about two-thirds the length of mesopleurum, and with a coarsely trans-striate mesopleural furrow joining it, and extending forward to the epic- nemia (Fig. 31) ; mesosternum more finely and sparsely punctate, the posterior carina at most very narrowly interrupted at the lateral angle ; propodeum similar to that of pumilus, but the sculpture weaker ; hind coxa punctate, the puncture sparser apically. Gaster with the post-petiole sparsely punctate, usually punctate-striate laterally, apically ; tergites 2 and 3 with clear punctures, becoming obsolete apically ; the following tergites rather sparsely pubescent ; hind wing with the nervellus antefurcal. Colour : black ; clypeus red, usually infuscate basally ; mandible with the shaft pale red ; antenna with the scape red, infuscate dorsally, pedicel and base of flagellum testaceous or marked with testaceous ; tegulae pale testaceous ; pronotal collar centrally sometimes marked with pale testaceous ; legs red, marked with pale testaceous, hind coxa infuscate at least basally, hind femur usually infuscate at least apically, hind tibia sometimes marked with fuscous apically, apical mid and hind tarsal segments usually infuscate. Length : 4-5 mm. ; fig. 37, P. fulvitarsis, . Hind coxa of P. foveolatus, $ : fig. 38, lateral ; fig. 39, ventral. sculpture (as in all species of this group) ; hypostomal carina strongly raised, the genal carina meeting this at a distance behind the base of the mandible less than the length of the malar space ; gena not excavate ; antenna somewhat stout apically, the post-anellus at most equal to the distance between the posterior ocelli (Fig. 36) ; antenna with 23-25 segments (24 in 9 out of 14 specimens). Thorax : pronotal collar well developed, the transverse groove distinct, the lateral groove and the lower part of the hind margin striate, above this rather coarsely punctate ; notauli represented by a deep anterior pit, behind this rarely with a very short, hardly traceable impres- sion ; mesoscutum with rather coarse, clear punctures on the disc, more finely and sparsely punctate on the lateral lobes ; scutellum a little more finely punctate than the disc of the meso- scutum, more coarsely punctate than the lateral lobes ; mesopleurum punctate, becoming punctate-striate behind, the speculum for the most part with sparse, rather coarse punctures ; sternauli shallow and inconspicuously crenulate, hardly extending to half ; mesosternum more finely punctured than the pleurum ; propodeum with all the areae distinct, the area superomedia elongate, hexagonal, receiving the costula well before the middle, weakly rugose ; area interna NOTES ON BRITISH ICHNEUMONIN AE 167 and area dentipara weakly rugose and punctate, area petiolaris trans-striate-punctate, aera externa rugose, area spiracularis striate-punctate ; metapleurum punctate, striate in part ; hind coxa with an oblique, sub-apical carina, which is very weakly, broadly raised externally, and more sharply raised internally, the area before the carina very finely punctate with only a faint indication of oblique striation (Figs. 38-39). Gaster with the post-petiole weakly coriaceous in part, sometimes in part longitudinally striate, and sometimes with a few scattered punctures ; thyridiae broad, and about as far from the base of the 2nd tergite as their length ; tergites 2 and 3 coriaceous with few, widely scattered punctures ; tergite 4 similarly but more weakly sculptured, the following segments becoming progressively smoother ; hind wing with the nervellus opposite, or slightly postfurcal. Colour : black ; mandibles pale testaceous except for the teeth ; antenna with the scape and pedicel black, varying to broadly testaceous beneath ; 3 or 4 basal flagellar segments testaceous ; a white stripe usually on antennal segments 9-12, sometimes reduced, and in 2 German speci- mens on segments 8-12 ; legs red, pale testaceous in part, the hind femur and sometimes the hind coxa infuscate apically, the hind tibia rather narrowly infuscate basally and apically, and the apical tarsal segments infuscate ; gaster with tergite i narrowly pale apically ; tergites 3-5 entirely red, the following segments narrowly piceous apically. (J. Similar to the $ in general sculpture, and also with the notauli only clearly represented by the anterior pit ; antenna with 27 segments, tyloidae on segments 10-13/14, the basal segments a little shorter than in rusticatus ; clypeus marked with yellow ; legs similar in colour to those of the $ but the coxae and hind trochanter can be extensively black marked, and the hind tarsus is fuscous, with the basal segments narrowly pale basally ; gaster with only the apices of the central segments narrowly testaceous, and more strongly coriaceous and punctate than in the $. Length : (J 5 mm. ; $ 5-6 mm. HOLOTYPE. $. Hym. 3b 1835. ENGLAND: Surrey; Boxhill, 9. v. 1891 (T. R. Billups}. (B.M.Coll.) ALLOTYPE. <$. ENGLAND: Surrey; Horsley, 24^11.1949 (/. F. Perkins) (B.M.Coll.) PARATYPES. ENGLAND: Kent; Deal, 4$, 2.viii.i88o; i$, 8.viii.i88o (T. R. Billups) ; Surrey ; i,^, same data as allotype. SCOTLAND : Inverness ; Aviemore, i$, 4. vi. 1952 (R. B. Benson). IRELAND : Co. Dublin ; Slade of Saggart, i$, 4 . x . 1936 (A . W. Stelfox} ; Co. Wicklow ; Dunran, i$, 25 . v . 1937 (A . W. Stelfox) . SWEDEN: Skane ; Ringsjon, i$, 4^.1938 (/. F. Perkins). GERMANY: 3$ (Riithe). (B.M.Coll.) FINLAND: Kuusamo ; Paanajarvi Rajala, i$, 5.vii.i935, beaten from Picea (G. J. Kerrich). (Helsinki Museum.) Phaeogenes (Proscus) coriaceus sp. nov. Similar to elongatus Thomson, but differing in the more coarsely coriaceous sculpture of the gaster, with only sparse punctures on the 2nd tergite. ?. Head with the temples slightly diverging directly behind the eyes, rather strongly convex ; frons and vertex coarsely punctate, the punctures becoming finer on the temples, the antennal scrobes trans-striate ; face with the epistoma convex, punctate at least laterally and dorsad, the rest of the face punctate with the punctures becoming coarser and sparser towards the orbits ; clypeus strongly transverse, sparsely punctate ; hypostomal carina narrow ; lower tooth of mandible a little smaller and shorter than the upper ; antenna with 20-22 segments, the post- anellus very slightly shorter than the following segment. ENTOM. Ill, 4. 13 1 68 NOTES ON BRITISH ICHNEUMONIN AE Thorax : pronotum with a broad collar (Fig. 40) centrally with the transverse groove very shallow, the lateral furrow irregularly trans-striate, the posterior margin more or less striate, strongly punctate dorsad ; mesoscutum. with the notauli very short, rather coarsely punctate, polished between the punctures except on the middle lobe anteriorly ; scutellum much more finely punctate than the disc of the mesoscutum ; mesopleurum coarsely punctate, punctate- striate anteriorly, ventrad, the speculum with punctures only along the posterior margin ; stern- aulus crenulate extending almost halfway to the posterior carina ; mesosternum more finely punctate, the posterior carina broadly interrupted before the lateral angle ; propodeum (Fig. 41) with the area superomedia elongate, hexagonal, receiving the costula well before the middle ; all the areae clearly differentiated ; basal area with the tubercle distinct, punctate basally becoming rugose laterally and apically, the area superomedia weakly or very weakly, irregularly trans-striate, the area petiolaris punctate-trans-striate and the area coxalis punctate ; hind coxa with the dorsal furrow almost devoid of sculpture, rugose dorsally at the base, punctate outwardly and beneath, the punctures becoming a little coarser and sparser apically and finer FIGS. 40, 41. Phaeogenes coriaceus, $ : fig. 40, thorax dorsally to show pronotal collar ; fig. 41, propodeum laterally. on the inner margin, unarmed ; hind femur about three times as long as broad ; wings with the nervellus postfurcal. Gaster with the post-petiole more or less coriaceous and longitudinally striate ; tergites 2 and 3 very strongly coriaceous, 2 with sparse punctures, 3 with punctures closer, basally ; tergite 4 a little less strongly coriaceous and with the punctures similar, though weaker, to those on 3 ; the following tergites weakly coriaceous, 5 and 6 weakly punctate basally. Colour : black ; face usually with a yellow spot on the lower, outer part of the antennal socket, sometimes also marked with red laterally ; clypeus red apically, often ivory in the lateral angles ; mandibles in large part pale testaceous ; scape sometimes reddish beneath, basal flagellar segments more or less marked with red, segments 1 1 and 1 2 sometimes white marked ; thorax with the pronotal collar more or less marked with red or yellow centrally, tegula pale testaceous ; legs red, with the front and /or middle coxae infuscate basally, hind coxa usually black basally ; the trochanters often in part more or less yellow, hind trochanter sometimes infuscate ; hind femur infuscate apically, hind tibia infuscate at base and apex ; tarsi with the apical segment infuscate and on the hind leg usually with all the segments more or less fuscous NOTES ON BRITISH ICHNEUMONIN AE 169 marked ; wings hyaline, very weakly smoky apically, the stigma black ; gaster with the apex of tergite i and tergites 2-4 red, the following tergites piceous apically. , but with the temples less broad, the face longer and the epistoma hardly differentiated, the malar space shorter ; antenna with 26 segments, segments 7-15 with large tyloidae ; thorax less elongate ; hind femur a little thinner (length : breadth about 3-4 : i) ; gaster with the post-petiole shining, more rugose. Face, clypeus and malar space yellow ; scape and pedicel yellow marked beneath, flagellum fuscous, yellowish beneath ; front and middle coxae and trochanters yellow, the femora and tibiae marked with yellow ; hind coxa black basally though red to yellow apically, hind trochan- ter and trochantellus yellow, hind femur not fuscous apically ; gaster with tergites 2, 3 and 4 black or fuscous marked dorsally. Length : 5-7 mm. HOLOTYPE. $. Hym. 3b 1836. ENGLAND : Hants ; New Forest, Denny, on dead beech 6.vi.iQ34 (C. Morley). (B.M.Coll.) (Aethecerus dispar Wesmael det. C. Morley.) ALLOTYPE. $. ENGLAND : Hants ; New Forest, Denny wood, on dead beech, 7.vii.i940 (C. Morley). (B.M.Coll.) (Centeterus opprimator Gravenhorst det. C. Morley). PARATYPES. ENGLAND: Hants; New Forest, i$, i7.vii.38 (Phaeogenes suspi- cax det. C. Morley) ; i$, 9^.1934 (Aethecerus dispar det. C. Morley) (C. Morley). (C. Morley Coll.) GERMANY : i$, (Ruthe). (B.M.Coll.) XII. CHECK LIST OF BRITISH ICHNEUMONINAE The changes to the British List of Ichneumoninae, which have been dealt with in the preceding pages, are here brought together. So many points remain unsolved that this list can, at most, be considered as a basis for further change. There are also certain matters which should be made clear. I have used Ambly teles in the sense of Thomson and have not accepted the segregates that are recognized by Heinrich. I have examined the male genitalia of those European and North American species which are available to me for dissection and find that in some cases these show quite striking group characters ; however, in certain of these groups I have so far been unable to correlate the differences with other satisfactory characters, so I prefer to place the species in one genus as they all have a number of characters in common, and to wait for a much wider investigation before accepting the segregates. It should, perhaps, be pointed out that under Triptognathus other workers have assembled two quite divergent elements ; and that the male genitalia of Ambly teles subsericans and elongatus are essentially similar, though showing also the only reliable differences of which I know for separating the males of these two species, so that either both have to be included in Limerodops or both retained in Ambly teles. Certain placements of genera within tribes are obviously unsatisfactory ; Hypo- mecus, Apaeleticus, Goedartia, Hepiopelmus and Acolobus I have retained in the tribes in which they have been placed by recent authors ; Tricholabus, which seems to me to be a completely anomalous genus, I have included in the Ichneumonini. The Phaeogenini, too, contains very diverse elements, and are grouped together on 1 7 o NOTES ON BRITISH ICHNEUMONIN AE very superficial characters. I have also retained the Heresiarchini as a separate tribe ; if these are placed in the Protichneumonini as Heinrich has proposed, then this latter name will be a synonym of Heresiarchini, though the position concerning the names of the higher categories has not yet been completely clarified by the International Commission on Nomenclature. It will be seen that a few dates, particularly earlier ones, differ from those given in Kloet and Hincks' list ; in these cases I have followed the findings of Sherborn. In addition to this, I have accepted the date of Holmgren's fascicle on Phaeogenini as being 1889 as given by Kloet and Hincks, and not 1890 as quoted by Dalla Torre and on the title-page to the complete volume of Holmgren's Ichneumoninae ; Sharp, in the Zoological Record, decided, on the evidence available to him, that 1889 was correct. TROGINI TROGUS Panzer, 1806. lapidator (Fabricius, 1787). PSILOMASTAX Tischbein, 1868. CERCODINOTOMUS Uchida, 1940. pyramidalis Tischbein, 1868. pictus (Kriechbaumer, 1882). CALLAJOPPA Cameron, 1903. cirrogastra (Schrank, 1781). exaltatoria (Panzer, 1804). PR O TICHNE UMONINI PROTICHNEUMON Thomson, 1893. pisorius (Linnaeus, 1758). coqueberti (Wesmael, 1848). erythrogaster (Stephens, 1835). nee (Gmelin, 1790). AMBLYJOPPA Cameron, 1902. fuscipennis (Wesmael, 1844). proteus (Christ, 1791). laminatoria (Fabricius, 1798). COELICHNEUMON Thomson, 1893. cyaniventris (Wesmael, 1859). desinatorius (Thunberg, 1822). sitbguttatus (Gravenhorst, 1829). leucocerus (Gravenhorst, 1820). falsificus (Wesmael, 1844). auspex (Mueller, 1776). nigerrimus (Stephens, 1835). derasus (Wesmael, 1844). bilineatus (Gmelin, 1790). haemorrhoidalis (Gravenhorst, 1820). truncatulus (Thomson, 1886). solutus (Holmgren, 1864). impressor (Zetterstedt, 1838). consimilis (Wesmael, 1844). purpurissatus Perkins, 1953. nigrator (Fabricius, 1793). nee (Mueller, 1776). comitator (Linnaeus, 1758). ferreus (Gravenhorst, 1829). microstictus (Gravenhorst, 1829). serenus (Gravenhorst, 1820). ruficauda (Wesmael, 1844). orbitator (Thunberg, 1822). HERESIARCHINI HERESI ARCHES Wesmael, 1859. eudoxius (Wesmael, 1844). LIS TRODROMINI NEOTYPUS Foerster, 1868. nobilitator (Gravenhorst, 1807). LISTRODROMUS Wesmael, 1844. nycthemerus (Gravenhorst, 1820). ANISOBAS Wesmael, 1844. cingulatorius (Gravenhorst, 1820). platy stylus Thomson, 1888. ICHNEUMONINI HOPLISMENUS Gravenhorst, 1829. bidentatus (Gmelin, 1790). spinosus (Morley, 1903). maurus (Marshall, 1873). bispinatorius auctt. angl. NOTES ON BRITISH ICHNEUMONIN AE 171 Ichneumonini cont. albifrons Gravenhorst, 1829. armatorius (Fabricius, 1787). nee (Forster, 1771). STENICHNEUMON Thomson, 1893. culpator (Schrank, 1802). militarius (Thunberg, 1822). rufinus (Gravenhorst, 1820). lineator (Fabricius, 1781). trilineatus (Gmelin, 1790). scutellator (Gravenhorst, 1829). AOPLUS Tischbein, 1874. alienator (Wesmael, 1855). defraudator (Wesmael, 1844). castaneus (Gravenhorst, 1820). mtzeburgii (Hartig, 1838). virginalis (Wesmael, 1844). ochropis (Gmelin, 1790). rubricosus (Holmgren, 1864). ruficeps (Gravenhorst, 1829). humilis (Wesmael, 1857). PLATYLABOPS Heinrich, 1950. apricus (Gravenhorst, 1820). semirufus (Desvignes, 1856). pulchellatus (Bridgman, 1889). CRATICHNEUMON Thomson, 1893. magus (Wesmael, 1855). nitidus (Bridgman, 1886). varipes (Gravenhorst, 1829). fallax Habermehl, 1923. jocularis (Wesmael, 1848). dissimilis auctt. angl. punctifrons (Holmgren, 1864). rufifrons (Gravenhorst, 1829). sicarius (Gravenhorst, 1829). foersteri (Wesmael, 1848). luleiventris (Gravenhorst, 1820). versator (Thunberg, 1822). nigrilarius (Gravenhorst, 1820). albifrons (Stephens, 1835). gravenhorstii (Boyer de Fonscolombe, 1847). nee (Wesmael, 1836). nee (Guerin-MeneVille, 1838). fabricator maculifrons (Stephens, 1835). infidus (Wesmael, 1848). liostylus (Thomson, 1887). culex (Mueller, 1776). clarigator (Wesmael, 1844). fugitivus (Gravenhorst, 1829). corruscator (Linnaeus, 1758). semirufus (Gravenhorst, 1820). pseudocryptus (Wesmael, 1857). albilarvatus (Gravenhorst, 1820). lanius (Gravenhorst, 1829). EUPALAMUS Wesmael, 1844. wesmaeli Thomson, 1886. lacteator (Gravenhorst, 1829). ERISTICUS Wesmael, 1844. clericus (Gravenhorst, 1829). BARICHNEUMON Thomson, 1893. anator (Fabricius, 1793). gemellus (Gravenhorst, 1829). carri Habermehl, 1923. albilineatus (Gravenhorst, 1820). albolineatus (Gravenhorst, 1829). bimaculatus (Schrank, 1776). saturatorius (Linnaeus, 1758). monostagon (Gravenhorst, 1820). maculicauda Perkins, 1953. per scrutator (Wesmael, 1844). nee (Thunberg, 1822). dumeticola (Gravenhorst, 1829). faunus (Gravenhorst, 1829). albosignatus (Gravenhorst, 1829). digrammus (Gravenhorst, 1820). nudicoxa (Thomson, 1888). sanguinator (Rossi, 1794). leucocheilus (Wesmael, 1844). peregrinator (Linnaeus, 1758). heracleanae (Bridgman, 1884). praeceptor (Thunberg, 1822). bilunulatus auctt. angl. derogator (Wesmael, 1844). chionomus (Wesmael, 1844). plagiarius (Wesmael, 1848). deceptor (Scopoli, 1763). vestigator (Wesmael, 1844). nee (Thunberg, 1822). lepidus (Gravenhorst, 1829). ter 'genus (Gravenhorst, 1820). callicerus (Gravenhorst, 1820). coxiglyptus Heinrich, 1951. incubitor auctt. angl. citator (Thunberg, 1822). basiglyptus (Kriechbaumer, 1890). locutor (Thunberg, 1822). ridibundus (Gravenhorst, 1829). CHASMIAS Ashmead, 1900. motatorius (Fabricius, 1775). paludator (Desvignes, 1854). paludicola (Wesmael, 1857). 172 NOTES ON BRITISH ICHNEUMONINAE Ichneumonini cant. ICHNEUMON Linnaeus, 1758. lugens Gravenhorst, 1829. sarcitorius Linnaeus, 1758. lautatorius Desvignes, 1856. xanthorius Forster, 1771. deliratorius Linnaeus, 1758. molitorius Linnaeus, 1761. crassifemur Thomson, 1886. melanotis Holmgren, 1864. macrocerus Thomson, 1886. confusor Gravenhorst, 1820. confusorius Gravenhorst, 1829. bucculentus Wesmael, 1844. septentrionalis atrifemw Perkins, 1953. ligatorius Thunberg, 1822. suspiciosus Wesmael, 1844. extensorius Linnaeus, 1758. militaris auctt. angl. gracilentus Wesmael, 1844. albiger, Wesmael, 1844. tempestivus Holmgren, 1864. validicornis Holmgren, 1864. albicollis Wesmael, 1857. stramentarius Gravenhorst, 1820. terminatorius Gravenhorst, 1820. computatoriits Mueller, 1776. eurycerus Thomson, 1890. fuscatus Gravenhorst, 1829. rufidorsatus Bridgman, 1887. memorator Wesmael, 1844. latrator Fabricius, 1781. subquadratus Thomson, 1887. analis Gravenhorst, 1829. spurius Wesmael, 1848. primatovius Forster, 1771. bellipes Wesmael, 1844. didymus Gravenhorst, 1829. tuberculipes Wesmael, 1848. megapodius Heinrich, 1949. formosus Gravenhorst, 1829. obsessor Wesmael, 1844. haglundi Holmgren, 1864. microcephalus Stephens, 1835. quartanus Perkins, 1953. gracilicornis Gravenhorst, 1829. emancipatus Wesmael, 1844. exilicornis Wesmael, 1857. caloscelis Wesmael, 1844. insidiosus Wesmael, 1844. minutorius Desvignes, 1856. captorius Thomson, 1887. nee Thunberg, 1822. caproni Perkins, 1953. nereni Thomson, 1887. ignobilis Wesmael, 1855. aquilonius Perkins, 1953. vulneratorius Zetterstedt, 1838. walkeri Wesmael, 1848. haereticus (Wesmael, 1854). cessator Mueller, 1776. THYRATELES Perkins, 1953. camelinus (Wesmael, 1844). PROBOLUS Wesmael, 1844. culpatorius (Linnaeus, 1758). concinnus Wesmael, 1853. CTENICHNEUMON Thomson, 1894. edictorius (Linnaeus, 1758). divisorius (Gravenhorst, 1820). inspector (Wesmael, 1844). rubroater (Ratzeburg, 1852). melanocastani4S auctt. angl. nitens (Christ, 1791). devylderi (Holmgren, 1871). repentinus auctt. angl. messorius (Gravenhorst, 1820). funereus (Geoffrey, 1785). panzeri (Wesmael, 1844). flavocinctus (Desvignes, 1856). castigator (Fabricius, 1793). SPILICHNEUMON Thomson, 1894. occisorius (Fabricius, 1793). johansoni (Holmgren, 1871). stagnicola (Thomson, 1888). celenae Perkins, 1953. raptorius (Linnaeus, 1758). septemguttatus (Gravenhorst, 1829). AMBLYTELES Wesmael, 1844. punctus (Gravenhorst, 1829). nee (Shaw, 1798). fabricii (Schrank, 1802). armatorius (Forster, 1771). propinquus Perkins, 1953. crispatorius (Linnaeus, 1758). glaucatorius (Fabricius, 1793). pictus (Schrank, 1776). ? labor atorius (Mueller, 1776). vadatorius (Illiger, 1807). pallidicornis (Gravenhorst, 1829). pulchellus (Christ, 1791). negatorius (Fabricius, 1793). equitatorius (Panzer, 1786). mercatorius (Fabricius, 1793). NOTES ON BRITISH ICHNEUMONINAE 173 Ichneutnonini cont. monitorius (Panzer, 1801). quadripunctonus (Mueller, 1776). castanopyga (Stephens, 1835). amatorius (Mueller, 1776). luctatorius (Linnaeus, 1758). longigena Thomson, 1888. cerinthius auctt. angl. gradatorius (Thunberg, 1822). trifasciatus (Gravenhorst, 1829). palliatorius (Gravenhorst, 1829). margineguttatus (Gravenhorst, 1829). oratorius (Fabricius, 1793). indocilis Wesmael, 1844. subsericans (Gravenhorst, 1820). elongatus Brischke, 1878. subsericans var. elongatus Brischke, 1878. LIMERODES Wesmael, 1844. arctiventris (Boie, 1841). EXEPHANES Wesmael, 1844. ischioxanthus (Gravenhorst, 1829). hilaris (Gravenhorst, 1829). nee (Say, Jan. 1829). occupator (Gravenhorst, 1829). caelebs Kreichbaumer, 1890. amabilis Kreichbaumer, 1895. ACOLOBUS Wesmael, 1844. albimanus (Gravenhorst, 1829). sericeus Wesmael, 1844. HEPIOPELMUS Wesmael, 1844. variegatorius (Panzer, 1800). leucostigmus (Gravenhorst, 1820). TRICHOLABUS Thomson, 1894. strigatorius (Gravenhorst, 1829). EURYLABINI GOEDARTIA Boie, 1841. alboguttata (Gravenhorst, 1829). EURYLABUS Wesmael, 1844. larvatus (Christ, 1791). torvus Wesmael, 1844. tristis (Gravenhorst, 1829). ZIMMERINI ZIMMERIA Heinrich, 1933. dirus (Wesmael, 1853). PLATYLABINI RHYSSOLABUS Berthoumieu, 1896. arcticus Hell6n, 1942. PRISTICEROS Gravenhorst, 1829. serrarius Gravenhorst, 1829. infractorius (Linnaeus, 1761). PLATYLABUS Wesmael, 1844. nigrocyaneus (Gravenhorst, 1829). tenuicornis (Gravenhorst, 1829). histrio Wesmael, 1855. variegatus Wesmael, 1844. dolorosus (Gravenhorst, 1829). rufus Wesmael, 1844. gigas Kreichbaumer, 1886. transversus Bridgman, 1889. punctifrons Thomson, 1888. intermedius Holmgren, 1871. opaculus Thomson, 1888. pedatorius (Fabricius, 1793)- obator (Desvignes, 1856). stolidus Perkins, 1953. odiosus Perkins, 1953. iridipennis (Gravenhorst, 1829). pumilio Holmgren, 1871. rufiventris Wesmael, 1344. vibratorius (Thunberg, 1822). decipiens Wesmael, 1*48. tricingulatus (Gravenhorst, 1820). concinnus Thomson, 1888. ASTHENOLABUS Heinrich, 1951. STENOLABUS Heinrich, 1936. nee Schulthess-Rechberg, 1910. vitratorius (Gravenhorst, 1829). latiscapus (Thomson, 1894). CYCLOLABUS Heinrich, 1935. nigricollis (Wesmael, 1844). pactor (Wesmael, 1844). dubiosus Perkins, 1953. ECTOPIUS Wesmael, 1859. rubellus (Gmelin, 1790). exhortator (Fabricius, 1787). HYPOMECUS Wesmael, 1844. quadriannulatus (Gravenhorst, 1829). APAELETICUS Wesmael, 1844. inimicus (Gravenhorst, 1820). bellicosus Wesmael, 1844. ivclytus Wesmael, 1853. NOTES ON BRITISH ICHNEUMONIN AE PHAEOGENINI RHEXIDERMUS Foerster, 1868. ISCHNOPSIDEA Viereck, 1914. nigricollis (Wesmael, 1844). rufipes (Wesmael, 1848). thoracicus (Gravenhorst, 1829). HETERISCHNUS Wesmael, 1859. pulex (Mueller, 1776). rufipes auctt. MISETUS Wesmael, 1844. oculatus Wesmael, 1844. HEMICHNEUMON Wesmael, 1857. elongatus (Ratzeburg, 1852). TRACHYARUS Thomson, 1891. corvinus Thomson, 1891. NEMATOMICRUS Wesmael, 1844. tenellus Wesmael, 1844. STENODONTUS Berthoumieu, 1896. marginellus (Gravenhorst, 1829). ERIPLATYS Foerster, 1868. MELANOMICRUS Morley, 1903. ardeicollis (Wesmael, 1844). elliotti (Morley, 1903). HERPESTOMUS Wesmael, 1844. wesmaeli Perkins, 1953. nasutus Wesmael, 1844. furunculus Wesmael, 1844. intermedius Wesmael, 1844. arridens (Gravenhorst, 1829). xanthops (Gravenhorst, 1829). brunnicornis (Gravenhorst, 1829). DICAELOTUS Wesmael, 1844. (incl. DELOGLYPTUS Foerster, 1868). pudibundus (Wesmael, 1844). punctiventris (Thomson, 1891). pictus (Schmiedeknecht, 1903). parvulus (Gravenhorst, 1829). orbitalis Thomson, 1891. ruficoxatus (Gravenhorst, 1829). fitchi Perkins, 1953. erythrostomus Wesmael, 1844. inflexus Thomson, 1891. ? rufilimbatus (Gravenhorst, 1820). rufoniger Berthoumieu, 1896. pumilus var. rufoniger Berthoumieu, 1896. earner oni Bridgman, 1881. pumilus (Gravenhorst, 1829). morosus Wesmael, 1855. suspectus Perkins, 1953. EPITOMUS Foerster, 1868. parvus Thomson, 1891. pygmaeus (Brischke, 1890, nee i proximus Perkins, 1953. ORONOTUS Wesmael, 1844. binotatus (Gravenhorst, 1829). NOTOSEMUS Foerster, 1868. bohemani (Wesmael, 1855). albibuccus (Kreichbaumer, 1890). MEVESIA Holmgren, 1889. arguta (Wesmael, 1844). guttata Perkins, 1953. THYRAEELLA Holmgren, 1889. collaris (Gravenhorst, 1829). similis (Bridgman, 1881). DIADROMUS Wesmael, 1844. quadriguttatus (Gravenhorst, 1829). rubellus (Gravenhorst, 1829). ex parte. nee (Gmelin, 1790). troglodytes (Gravenhorst, 1829). subtilicornis (Gravenhorst, 1829). tenax Wesmael, 1844. varicolor Wesmael, 1844. albinotatus (Gravenhorst, 1829). candidatus (Gravenhorst, 1829). guttulatus (Gravenhorst, 1829). COLPOGNATHUS Wesmael, 1844. celerator (Gravenhorst, 1807). divisus Thomson, 1891. CENTETERUS Wesmael, 1844. confector (Gravenhorst, 1829). opprimator (Gravenhorst, 1820). EPARCES Foerster, 1868. grandiceps Thomson, 1891. MICROPE Thomson, 1891. macilenta (Wesmael, 1844). OIORHINUS Wesmael, 1844. pallipalpis Wesmael, 1844. NOTES ON BRITISH I CH N E UMONI N AE 175 Phaeogenini cont. PARAETHECERUS Perkins, 1953. elongatus Perkins, 1953. AETHECERUS Wesmael, 1844. dispar Wesmael, 1844. nitidus Wesmael, 1844. placidus Wesmael, 1844. discolor Wesmael, 1844. longuhts Wesmael, 1844. OROTYLUS Holmgren, 1889. mitis (Wesmael, 1848). PHAEOGENES Wesmael, 1844. (incl. PROSCUS Holmgren, 1889). semivulpinus (Gravenhorst, 1829). planifrons Wesmael, 1844. heterogonus Holmgren, 1889. curator (Thunberg, 1822). crassidens Thomson, 1891. melanogonos (Gmelin, 1790). melanogonus (Gravenhorst, 1820), emend. ophthalmicus Wesmael, 1844. stipator Wesmael, 1855. maculicornis (Stephens, 1835). scutellaris Wesmael, 1844. invisor (Thunberg, 1822). homochlorus Wesmael, 1844. mysticus Wesmael, 1855. callopus Wesmael, 1844. tibiator (Thunberg, 1822). nee (Gravenhorst, 1820). fulvitarsis Wesmael, 1844. ruficoxa Thomson, 1891. rusticatus Wesmael, 1844. fulvitarsis auctt. angl. ex parte. foveolatus Perkins, 1953. cephalotes Wesmael, 1844. elongatus Thomson, 1891. coriaceus Perkins, 1953. suspicax Wesmael, 1844. flavidens Wesmael, 1844. modestus Wesmael, 1844. impiger Wesmael, 1844. ischiomelinus (Gravenhorst, 1829). eques Wesmael, 1844. distinctus (Bridgman, 1887). infimus Wesmael, 1844. fuscicornis Wesmael, 1844. trepidus Wesmael, 1844. bellicornis Wesmael, 1844. osculator (Thunberg, 1822). socius Holmgren, 1889. ALOMYINI ALOMYA Panzer, 1806. semiflava Stephens, 1835. debellator (Fabricius, 1775). XIII. REFERENCES CARR, L. A. 1924. Trans. N. Staffs. Fid. CL, 58 : Appendix. DALLA TORRE, C. G. DE 1902. Catalogus Hymenopterorum 3 : pt. 2. Leipzig. HEINRICH, G. 1926. Dtsch. ent. Z. 1926 : 256. 1929. Ibid. 1928 : 318. 1933. Mitt. zool. Mus. Berl. 19 : 159. 1934. Ibid. 20 : 1-263. 1936. Dtsch. ent. Z. 1935 : 197. 1937- Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. ser. 10, 20 : 279. 1949. Mitt, munch, ent. Ges. 35-39 : 1-127. 1950. Mitt. Sammelst. Schmarotzerbest., 27 : 4-5. 1951. Bonn. zool. Beitr., (1951) : 235-290. LELLEN, W. 1942. Notul. ent., Helsingl. 22 : 77. KERRICH, G. J. 1935. Trans. Soc. Brit. Ent. 2 : 38. :OET, G. S., and HINCKS, W. D. 1945. A Check List of British Insects. Stockport. IORLEY, C. 1902. Ent. mon. Mag. 38 : 119-121. 1903. Ichneumonologia Britannica. The Ichneumons of Great Britain ; Ichneumoninae. Plymouth. ROMAN, A. 1912. Zool. Bidr. Uppsala, 1 : 229-293. 1914. Ark. Zool. 9, No. 2 : 1-40. 1932. Ent. Tidskr. 53 : 1-16. ENTOM. Ill, 4. 14 1 7 6 NOTES ON BRITISH ICHNEUMON IN AE SCHMIEDEKNECHT, O. IQO2. Opuscula Ichneumonologica, 1. Blankenburg in Thiiringia. 1928-1932. Ibid. Suppl.-Band 1. Blankenburg in Thiiringia. SHERBORN, C. D. 1901. Index Animalium, Part i. Cambridge. 1922-1933. Ibid., Part 2. London. UCHIDA, T. 1940. Insecta Matsum. 15 : 9. Note. Where the references to original descriptions are not quoted above, they may be found by consulting Dalla Torre (1902), Morley (1903), and Schmiedeknecht (1902) and (1928-1932). PRESENTED 1 7 DEC 1953 PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN BY ADLARD AND SON, LIMITED, BARTHOLOMEW PRESS, DORKING. 1 7 DEC 1953 ON A VERY REMARKABLE FLEA FROM ARGENTINA H. E. KARL JORDAN DESCRIPTIONS OF NEW AND LITTLE-KNOWN SIPHONAPTERA F. G. A. M. SMIT BULLETIN OF THE BRITISH MUSEUM (NATURAL HISTORY) ENTOMOLOGY Vol. 3 No. s LONDON: 1953 ON A VERY REMARKABLE FLEA FROM ARGENTINA COLLECTED BY DR. J. M. DE LA BARRERA BY H. E. KARL JORDAN DESCRIPTIONS OF NEW AND LITTLE-KNOWN SIPHONAPTERA BY F. G. A. M. SMIT Pp. 177-219 ; 67 Text-figures. BULLETIN OF THE BRITISH MUSEUM (NATURAL HISTORY) ENTOMOLOGY Vol. 3 No. 5 LONDON : 1953 THE BULLETIN OF THE BRITISH MUSEUM (NATURAL HISTORY), instituted in 1949, is issued in five series corresponding to the Departments of the Museum, and an Historical Series. Parts appear at irregular intervals as they become ready. Volumes will contain about three or four hundred pages, and will not necessarily be compiled within one calendar year. This paper is Vol. 3, No. 5 of the Entomological series. Issued December, 1953. Price Ten Shillings. ON A VERY REMARKABLE FLEA FROM ARGENTINA COLLECTED BY DR. J. M. DE LA BARRERA By H. E. KARL JORDAN (Tring, Herts) With 5 text -figures The rapid increase of our knowledge of the Flea fauna of the Republic of Argentina during recent years is due to Dr. J. M. de la Barrera, Director of the Institute of Hygiene at Buenos Aires, and we students of Siphonaptera in the Tring Department of the British Museum (Natural History) are profoundly grateful to him for the invalu- able collections submitted to the British Museum (Nat. Hist.) for study and report. The latest collection, received in the autumn of 1952, contained, inter alia, a number of interesting species from Bariloche, Nahuel Huapi, Rio Negro, where Dr. de la Barrera has a summer residence. Among these fleas is a species which excels in interest every other new one Dr. de la Barrera has previously discovered. When the specimens were cleared and mounted the very conspicuous and quite unexpected kind of distinction of this species took my breath away, and my two colleagues reacted in the same way : incredible! The Incredible Flea is the subject of this paper. A new species, new genus, new tribe. I name the genus Barreropsylla in appreciation of the great services Dr. de la Barrera has rendered and is continuing to render to the study of Fleas, an order of parasites so closely linked to his researches on the diseases of the wild mammals of his country. I expect that students of Siphonaptera will be as astonished at the somewhat spectacular distinctions of the species as we were, and that the extraordinarily wide gap, in some somatics, between Barreropsylla excelsa and the related species will arouse interest beyond the sphere of Siphonapterology. A short survey of the main characteristics will be sufficient to prove that the species provides an ample field of meditation for the taxonomist and geneticist In evaluating the characteristics of B. excelsa we must bear in mind that the species, apart from its special features, is an American Stephanocircid fitting well into the subfamily of Craneopsyllinae ; there is no doubt about that. Confining the discussion, for the sake of brevity, to four of the obvious distinguishing features of B. excelsa, we can group them into two phylogenetically contrasting categories : (a] Characters ancestral for the Stephanocircidae and (b) characters highly speciali- zed. The first category is exemplified in the postantennal section of the head (usually termed occiput in our writings on fleas) (Fig. 3) : the dorsal margin is medianly somewhat rounded dilated (dt) ; this is an early step in the evolution of a sclerotized band which extends some distance down the side in all other species of the family, Cleopsylla Rothschild, 1914, taking an intermediate position. Similarly primitive ENTOM. Ill, 5. 15 i8o VERY REMARKABLE FLEA FROM ARGENTINA are the arrangement and number of the setae on the occiput : they form three rows, in which Barreropsylla agrees with many fleas outside the family, but differs from the known species of Stephanocircidae, there being four rows in Cleopsylla and five or six in the other genera (for Cleopsylla see F. Smit's paper on fleas in this issue of the Bulletin, Figs. 13, 14). Category (b) is represented by the modifications of the genal comb and the pronotum : whereas the known species of helmet fleas have a genal comb of four or more spines (sometimes much shortened), we find in Barrero- psylla at the genal edge one to three dark knobs (Gc), which I interpret as being the remnants of a three-spined ancestral comb ; an advance in evolution by reduction which is no rarity in fleas. The modification of the pronotum is an extreme and probably not surpassed by any other flea existing ; it transcends the pronotal FIG. I. Pronotum of Nonnapsylla rothschildi Wagn., 1938, $ from Peru. FIG. 2. Pronotum of Meringis altipecten Traub & Hoff, 1951,